Proctologically Violated©® said:"PeterB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Proctologically Violated©® said:All--
There used to be "local wholesalers"/private labels that had perty cheap
vits.
Now, I can't find them and/or their prices are just through the roof!!
Eg,
Carlson, Thompson, some local outfits here in the metro NYC area.
The cheapest place I have been able to find is... Puritan's Pride, which
happens to be in LI.
Also CVS has comparable prices to PP, but not quite the selection.
Also, PP deigns to put out a trad'l style catalog, which altho not
super-organized, is not nearly as chaotic as it could be, and is thus
"manageable", if you spend the time to check out alternate formulations
for
the best value.
90% of the stuff at Costco/Sam's Club is grossly overpriced, esp. for any
"hot items", such as anything to do w/ osteoporosis, joint health, etc.
So-called Discount Vit houses on the web are anything but cheap.... often
3x the prices at PP!
In my perhaps out-of-date opinion, PP's prices are just about "normal".
And, PP plays all kinds of games w/ "3 for 1", "70% off", etc. All wind
up
approx. the same, but still way cheaper than the ripoffs elsewhere.
Any leads for better/cheaper vit suppliers? Really would appreciate the
info.
TIA!
Have you considered that you often get what you pay for? How do you
compare a fast-food meal to one you make at home? If price is your
only criteria for selecting a brand, it's debatable whether you should
even be taking a supplement. I pay about $11 a month for a food-grade,
synthetic free, multi vit. from MegaFood (bottle of 180 for about $64.)
It's a great deal. That $11 gives me more nutrition than I am getting
with $150 in groceries.
---------------------------
Some would say that the stockpile of raw vits is sorta like gas: all these
goddamm oil companies
are selling the same [censored].
More-or-less.
Not all "raw vits" are created equal. Synthetic forms work differently
than their naturally-occuring counterparts, except when they are
molecularly identical, as is the case with ascorbic acid. Synthetic B
vitamins have reasonably good value in short-term therapeutic use, but
aren't as effective as food-grade forms. The smokers study shows that
synthetic beta carotene is probably a bad idea for everyone.
Quoted message said:----------------------------
A vitamin costing $5 a month is probably
comprised of synthetic beta carotene (implicated in elevated cancer),
synthetic vitamin E (limited benefit, or none), synthetic vit. D2
(limited benefit, or none), synthetic B vitamins (questionable benefit,
except for folic acid), and ineffective forms of magnesium, selenium,
chromium, and other minerals.
----------------------------------------------
Cupla points/Q's.
1. The value of beta C is questionable anyway, as it's conversion to A is
really limited, and it seems to do funny things to retinas.
But I would be curious as to what is it about the synthetic form that would
cause cancer?
http://www.newstarget.com/012148.html
Quoted message said:My understanding is that the only problem w/ synthetic vits is that the
product is racemic, ie, D,L forms. Which can knock their activity down by
1/2, in some cases, but does not render them toxic or useless.
It's more complicated than that. Molecular weight differences exist
between synthetic and natural forms, as well. Metabolic handling of
natural vitamins is more efficient. The only case histories of
toxicity from vitamin supplementation I have found are from use of
synthetic vitamins, namely A, D, and B3. The great majority of
negative vitamin studies we have seen the last few years have resulted
from use of synthetic varieties.
Quoted message said:Iirc, supplements are D3, not D2.
What?
Quoted message said:There are no ineffective forms of minerals!
Of course there are, we have studies that show this. One example:
http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/magnesium.asp
Just as some foods are more nutritious than others, some mineral forms
are more easily absorbed than others. It can vary by individual, as
well. For instance, magnesium orotate is more efficiently absorbed
than magnesium oxide. Some forms of magnesium produce a laxative
effect precisely because they are *not* well absorbed. Milk of
Magnesia and magnesium sulfate (Epsom salts) works on that principle.
Quoted message said:In some cases, like Cr, the
polynicotinate is in fact absorbed to a much better degree than the
inorganic forms (chloride, sulfate, etc).
Correct.
Quoted message said:Cr picolinate is also absorbed
well, but likely toxic, and irrelevant in light of the natural nicotinate.
I agree, mostly.
Quoted message said:It has been cited that the cheapest form of Calcium, the lowly Calcium
Carbonate (chaulk?) is among the best absorbed.
Correct.
Quoted message said:Mineral chelates are [censored].
No, they aren't. In animal husbandry, if it doesn't work, it isn't
used, because it represents overhead. This reference may be of
interest: http://www.knovel.com/Knovel2/Toc.jsp?BookID=506
Here are some references that prove chelates work in human physiology,
as well.
Fouad, M.T., "Chelation and Chelated Minerals", J. Applied Nutrition,
28 (1) (1976).
Martell and Calvin, Chemistry of the Metal Chelate Compound, Prentiss
Hill Inc., New York, (1952)
Miller, J.J., Paper Presented to the International College of Applied
Nutrition, Pasadena, California, (1962).
Bates, G.W., et al, Amer. J. Nut., 25, p.983, (1972).
O'Dell, B.L., Cornell Nutritional Conference, p. 77, (1962).
Greenberger, A.S., et al, Science, 153, p. 315, (1966).
Quoted message said:Virtually all the fancy-shmancy derivatives
of Vit C are [censored]--but apparently Larry King fancies hisself a
nutritionist.
Go figger.
Except for the Larry King comment (I have no idea about that) I agree
with you.
Quoted message said:------------------------------------
Don't worry about hyped specialty
formulas for "bone health" or "brain power." Use a "shot-gun" approach
to get basic nutrition and avoid creating imbalance. If you have a
specific deficiency, you may need to address it with targeted
supplementatation, but choose food-grade forms whenever possible.
Don't let price dictate selection.
-------------------------------------
There are a variety of supplementing strategies out there, most of them
sub-optimal. I'm a lot more conservative than I used to be, but still
open-minded.
You do bring up a good indirect point, tho, that it is not immediately
obvious what in a multivit is natural or synthetic.
Most people don't even know to look.
PeterB