Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Another Ti frame thread

Started by Artoi · · Last activity · 40 posts · 2,695 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
16 April 2007
Last activity
20 April 2007
Original author
Artoi
Posts
40
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,695
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 40
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Donga said:

    The LS Ultimate is a little piggy compared to many modern bikes -
    something like 1350 g - Stuie's Cervelo P3 is around 850 g and has a
    lifetime warranty. So even with light parts, my bike still nudges 8.5
    kg for a similar price to bikes under 8.0. That said, it's a brilliant
    crit bike - corners like a rocket (faster than the competition) and
    doesn't waste energy in a sprint. I haven't ridden many other bikes
    (why would I?) so I can't really say how good it is comparatively,
    except it seems comfortable, fast and goes exactly where I point it at
    whatever speed. It also creates envy. But given the choice, I'd pick
    up another full Ti frame without the carbon.

    Quoted message said:

    Seven Cycles still produce several frames with mixed tubing, so they
    must be happy. I don't know why LS stopped making them. Perhaps they
    admitted to themselves there was no need, and people weren't buying
    the marketing gimmick. You also have to question why [censored] around with
    something that works, and introduce potential weaknesses?

    Quoted message said:

    There are some great Ti specials that come up, on eBay and in online
    shops, if you hunt a bit and have time. Don't be in a tearing hurry to
    get this one, unless you are sure.

    Thanks for the detail.

    At 1350g, I'd think you should be able to push the bike weight down to
    sub-8kg easy with careful choice ($$) of components. This Palladio is
    supposedly at 1315g. I am aiming at 7.5kg for the full bike if things
    work out as planned.
    --- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    Hmm, mixed Chorus and Record, 32 h wheels with Rev spokes around
    1600g, could drop 50g in stem/bar, Ti post, 300g pedals included (Time
    Impact S), could drop 50g on the saddle to put in a contoured board.
    Not a lot to trim without great expense. Are your measurements minus
    pedals?

    Donga

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Donga said:

    Hmm, mixed Chorus and Record, 32 h wheels with Rev spokes around
    1600g, could drop 50g in stem/bar, Ti post, 300g pedals included (Time
    Impact S), could drop 50g on the saddle to put in a contoured board.
    Not a lot to trim without great expense. Are your measurements minus
    pedals?

    Ummm... I haven't done a detailed calc. Just based on a guesstimate with
    reference to my present bike with Veloce triple. Just swapping out the
    triple crankset and BB to that of Chorus UT double or CT would save a
    significant amount. Otherwise it's Ritchey WCS alloy bar/stem/seatpost.
    The 1450g wheelset helps too.
    --

  3. Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    At least Merlin and Litespeed dropped the idea together with
    integrated headsets - another con of Opera Paladium.

    Quoted message said:

    Integrated headset? I didn't think that Opera Palladium had integrated
    headset. There was nothing special with the headset as far as I could
    tell.

    look again.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  4. David L. Johnson said:

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    the durability of the joning between carbon and titanium.

    Quoted message said:

    In general that is a real concern, but there have been people doing this
    for some time, with good success.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the durability of carbon - the reaseon why i wanted ti.

    Quoted message said:

    Well,... in that case, get ti. Seriously, if your major concern is
    longevity, an all-ti frame is hard to beat, especially if it is _not_
    stupid-light.

    ?? thatds whate i wrote, or at least gues i was. My consern was the
    durability of carbon. I wanted Ti because of the durability.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the duarbility of the integrated headset.

    Quoted message said:

    IMO a bad idea. Headsets can wear out, or at least parts will. Who
    knows whether the bearings or press-in cups will be available in 5
    years? If it is a standard headset, you can replace the whole thing if
    the particular brand/model is no longer made, but it's a shame to throw
    away a good (and expensive) frame because you can't find a headset part.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the stupidity of using a carbon rear on a Ti frame.

    Quoted message said:

    Not my choice, but...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the tubes where not seamless.

    Quoted message said:

    Huh? Is this 6/4 alloy?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It has a clear paint coat opposed to brushed raw titanium.

    Quoted message said:

    Boo. IMNSHO titanium should not be painted, and clearcoating is oubly
    bad. No reason to do that.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the weelds where not as nice as the Litespeed Firentze in the shop

    Quoted message said:

    Now, why is it that you want this bike?

    ???? i don't! I considered it last year and bought a Merlin instead.
    Your are commenting my list of reasons for _not_ buying the Opera.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  5. David L. Johnson said:

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the durability of the joning between carbon and titanium.

    Quoted message said:

    In general that is a real concern, but there have been people doing this
    for some time, with good success.

    Yes, but those frames haven't been used for more than 5 years, a ti
    frame should last 20 or 30 years. I doubt that those ti/carbon frames
    will last that long.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the durability of carbon - the reaseon why i wanted ti.

    Quoted message said:

    Well,... in that case, get ti. Seriously, if your major concern is
    longevity, an all-ti frame is hard to beat, especially if it is _not_
    stupid-light.

    read again "the reaseon why i wanted ti" and the reasen why i didn't
    want the Opera.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the duarbility of the integrated headset.

    Quoted message said:

    IMO a bad idea. Headsets can wear out, or at least parts will. Who
    knows whether the bearings or press-in cups will be available in 5
    years? If it is a standard headset, you can replace the whole thing if
    the particular brand/model is no longer made, but it's a shame to throw
    away a good (and expensive) frame because you can't find a headset part.

    My primarly reasons for /not/ wanting an integreated hedset are /not/ that
    it may be difficult to get spare parts. My reasons are that integrated
    headset is an infiriour construction which over time potentially can
    dammage the frame as mentioned in this article:
    <http://www.chrisking.com/tech/int_headsets_explained/int_hds_explain_1.html>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the stupidity of using a carbon rear on a Ti frame.

    Quoted message said:

    Not my choice, but...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the tubes where not seamless.

    Quoted message said:

    Huh? Is this 6/4 alloy?

    No, ordinary 3/2,5. Bianchi's, Omega's, Aribourne's (or what they call
    themselves this year) and some of Litespeeds Ti offerings are
    non-seamless as well.
    In fact Merlin seems to be the only manufacture who's entirely
    commited to seamless ti tubing. (their now dicontinued 6/4 version of
    the Works CR where also seamless)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It has a clear paint coat opposed to brushed raw titanium.

    Quoted message said:

    Boo. IMNSHO titanium should not be painted, and clearcoating is oubly
    bad. No reason to do that.

    exactly.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the weelds where not as nice as the Litespeed Firentze in the shop

    Quoted message said:

    Now, why is it that you want this bike?

    I didn't. Read my posting again. You are commenting on my list of
    reasons why i didn't get the Opera.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  6. Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the duarbility of the integrated headset.

    IMO a bad idea. Headsets can wear out, or at least parts will. Who
    knows whether the bearings or press-in cups will be available in 5
    years? If it is a standard headset, you can replace the whole thing if
    the particular brand/model is no longer made, but it's a shame to throw
    away a good (and expensive) frame because you can't find a headset part.

    Quoted message said:

    I am not sure that Opera Palladio has integrated headset. Can any one
    verify this one?

    All those i saw in here in Copenhagen had integrated headset. Just as
    all other Pinarello/Opreas within thew last 5 years.

    Here is at pic of the frame/bike i considered, in fact this is exactly
    the one... <http://fabin.dk/imagecatalog/OPERA_Palladio_1.jpg>

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  7. Artoi said:

    Interesting set of concerns. The joint b/n CF and Ti is probably ok
    given that there are so many Alu/CF frames these days.

    They are getting fewer, and they are not ment to last more than a few
    years. A Ti frame is ment to last a lifetime.

    Quoted message said:

    There must be
    some good durability data on that. I didn't notice that the tubes
    weren't seamless, I'll have to have another look at that one.

    most Ti bikes uses non seamless tubes.

    If Merlin or Litespeed are to expensive you could take a lok on
    Airbourne/Van Nicholas <http://www.vannicholas.com> or the Ti frames
    sold by a guy who's been writing in rec.bicycles.tech for years (Micky
    somthing). And if youre in the marked for a cheap custum Ti frame
    there is: <http://setavento.com/>.

    My final dicision was between a Merlin (Spectrum would take too long
    and be to troublesome) and a cheaper custum Setavento. I opted for the
    Merlin becuase of the marginally lower weight and because my LBS could
    get it within in 6 weeks. The Setavento would take considerably longer
    and i had already spent 6 month diciding between a nice Look 481SL
    carbon frame and Titanium.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  8. Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:

    or the Ti frames
    sold by a guy who's been writing in rec.bicycles.tech for years (Micky
    somthing)

    Mouse.

    Sorry, Mark.

    It's Mark Hickey, Morten.

    --
    Ted Bennett
    Portland, Orygun

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:
    Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > the duarbility of the integrated headset.

    IMO a bad idea. Headsets can wear out, or at least parts will. Who
    knows whether the bearings or press-in cups will be available in 5
    years? If it is a standard headset, you can replace the whole thing if
    the particular brand/model is no longer made, but it's a shame to throw
    away a good (and expensive) frame because you can't find a headset part.

    Quoted message said:

    I am not sure that Opera Palladio has integrated headset. Can any one
    verify this one?

    All those i saw in here in Copenhagen had integrated headset. Just as
    all other Pinarello/Opreas within thew last 5 years.

    Here is at pic of the frame/bike i considered, in fact this is exactly
    the one... <http://fabin.dk/imagecatalog/OPERA_Palladio_1.jpg>

    You are right. I checked again and indeed it is an integrated headset of
    some sort. Reading elsewhere, there seemed to be a whole bunch of
    different integrated headset designs as well as partial intergrated.
    Never knew that there are so many different standards out there with
    headsets. It was a bit of a shock but now I know.
    --

  10. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:
    Artoi said:

    Interesting set of concerns. The joint b/n CF and Ti is probably ok
    given that there are so many Alu/CF frames these days.

    They are getting fewer, and they are not ment to last more than a few
    years. A Ti frame is ment to last a lifetime.

    That's logical.

    Quoted message said:

    If Merlin or Litespeed are to expensive you could take a lok on
    Airbourne/Van Nicholas <http://www.vannicholas.com> or the Ti frames
    sold by a guy who's been writing in rec.bicycles.tech for years (Micky
    somthing). And if youre in the marked for a cheap custum Ti frame
    there is: <http://setavento.com/>.

    Well, I wasn't specifically looking for a Ti frame in the first place,
    but just came across it at a significant discount and thought it's not a
    bad Italian frame worthy of consideration. I'll think some more.
    --

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:
    Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen<[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    At least Merlin and Litespeed dropped the idea together with
    integrated headsets - another con of Opera Paladium.

    Quoted message said:

    Integrated headset? I didn't think that Opera Palladium had integrated
    headset. There was nothing special with the headset as far as I could
    tell.

    look again.

    Done. You were correct. It's some kind of integrated headset.

    Tough part is that there are no more spec sheets I can find on the net
    that lists these in detail. Don't understand why Opera/Pinarello don't
    have a section on older products. Pretty cheap.
    --

  12. Artoi said:

    You are right. I checked again and indeed it is an integrated headset of
    some sort. Reading elsewhere, there seemed to be a whole bunch of
    different integrated headset designs as well as partial intergrated.
    Never knew that there are so many different standards out there with
    headsets. It was a bit of a shock but now I know.

    Beeing an italian frame, it's proberbly a Columbus style integrated
    headset. Campy makes those and will probeply countnue dooing so for
    years. As i remember Canondale use(ed) the them too.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  13. Artoi said:

    Well, I wasn't specifically looking for a Ti frame in the first place,
    but just came across it at a significant discount and thought it's not a
    bad Italian frame worthy of consideration. I'll think some more.

    If youre not looking for a fram that will last a life time and it isn't
    more expensive than than the aluy, steel or carbon frames you have in mind:
    go for for the Opera!

    If it costs as much as a Litesspeed, Merlin, Bianchi or even a custum
    setanvento: don't go for the Opera.

    The ride of a Ti frame is just so nice, it can't be compared to anything
    else.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  14. Ted Bennett said:

    Sorry, Mark.

    Quoted message said:

    It's Mark Hickey, Morten.

    that's the one.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  15. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:
    Artoi said:

    Well, I wasn't specifically looking for a Ti frame in the first place,
    but just came across it at a significant discount and thought it's not a
    bad Italian frame worthy of consideration. I'll think some more.

    If youre not looking for a fram that will last a life time and it isn't
    more expensive than than the aluy, steel or carbon frames you have in mind:
    go for for the Opera!

    Ummm... I think "lasting for a lifetime" would be nice. The fact of the
    matter is we do buy new bikes despite what I'll tell my wife. 😉

    Quoted message said:

    If it costs as much as a Litesspeed, Merlin, Bianchi or even a custum
    setanvento: don't go for the Opera.

    Well, it's not the cheapest but nor the most expensive of frames.

    Quoted message said:

    The ride of a Ti frame is just so nice, it can't be compared to anything
    else.

    That's what attracted me to consider Ti at this point.

    That LBS also had a Lapiere Sandium (very light weight) and a Pinarello
    (Alu/CF) frame on offer.

    I'll go back and talk a bit more.
    --

  16. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:
    Artoi said:

    You are right. I checked again and indeed it is an integrated headset of
    some sort. Reading elsewhere, there seemed to be a whole bunch of
    different integrated headset designs as well as partial intergrated.
    Never knew that there are so many different standards out there with
    headsets. It was a bit of a shock but now I know.

    Beeing an italian frame, it's proberbly a Columbus style integrated
    headset. Campy makes those and will probeply countnue dooing so for
    years. As i remember Canondale use(ed) the them too.

    That's more reassuring given Campy's backing.
    --

  17. Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:

    Artoi <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Well, I wasn't specifically looking for a Ti frame in the first place,
    but just came across it at a significant discount and thought it's not a
    bad Italian frame worthy of consideration. I'll think some more.

    Quoted message said:

    If youre not looking for a fram that will last a life time and it isn't
    more expensive than than the aluy, steel or carbon frames you have in mind:
    go for for the Opera!

    Ummm... I think "lasting for a lifetime" would be nice. The fact of the
    matter is we do buy new bikes despite what I'll tell my wife. 😉

    Quoted message said:

    If it costs as much as a Litesspeed, Merlin, Bianchi or even a custum
    setanvento: don't go for the Opera.

    Well, it's not the cheapest but nor the most expensive of frames.

    Quoted message said:

    The ride of a Ti frame is just so nice, it can't be compared to anything
    else.

    That's what attracted me to consider Ti at this point.

    That LBS also had a Lapiere Sandium (very light weight) and a Pinarello
    (Alu/CF) frame on offer.

    I'll go back and talk a bit more.
    --

    What are your selection criteria? I get the feeling you have not
    focussed down too far yet - if Ti, Ti/C, C, Al/C and Al are still on
    the range.

    Donga

  18. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Donga said:

    What are your selection criteria? I get the feeling you have not
    focussed down too far yet - if Ti, Ti/C, C, Al/C and Al are still on
    the range.

    Primarily a project bike to go through a complete build. I am open to
    all comers, but something different with quality is nice. CF could be
    nice, but there's nothing special about them these days. As I said, I
    came across the frame by accident and got my interest up. There's no
    time pressure to act.
    --

  19. Artoi said:

    That LBS also had a Lapiere Sandium (very light weight) and a Pinarello
    (Alu/CF) frame on offer.

    I'm shure that the Operea will oulast those two.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    Merlin Works CR-3/2.5 & Campagnolo Chorus 2007.

  20. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:
    Artoi said:

    That LBS also had a Lapiere Sandium (very light weight) and a Pinarello
    (Alu/CF) frame on offer.

    I'm shure that the Operea will oulast those two.

    I suspect so. At least the Opera would be quite unique and a good
    keeper. We'll see...
    --

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.