Another letter

Simon Mason said:

No. I'll put up some photos of the area soon.

Better post a brief description of the photos too, it won't do to just post a url ;-)

--
Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( juggler.netdannyOpen ↗ ) Recumbent cycle page:
speedy5.freeserve.co.ukrecumbentsOpen ↗ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
Thomas Paine

James Hodson <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Miscarriage of justice? You jest, surely? :-)

My own view on pavement cycling is quite simple. I have no objection at all to young children,
when accompanied by an adult, cycling on a pavement. However, once those children grow a little, I
do object. If asked to come up with non-pavement-riding age, I'd say anyone over 10 should ride on
the correct bit of tarmac: the road.

I agree entirely. However, from Simon's description this does not appear to be a case of
pavement cycling.

--
Dave...

James Hodson said:

My own view on pavement cycling is quite simple. I have no objection at all to young children,
when accompanied by an adult, cycling on a pavement. However, once those children grow a little, I
do object. If asked to come up with non-pavement-riding age, I'd say anyone over 10 should ride on
the correct bit of tarmac: the road.

IIRC fixed penalty notices for that offence cannot be issued to anyone under
16.

Tony

--
raven-family.comraven-family.comOpen ↗

"I don't want any yes-men around me. I want everybody to tell me the truth even if it costs them
their job."

Samuel Goldwyn

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>> "TR" == Tony Raven <[email hidden]> writes:

TR James Hodson said:

Quoted message said:

My own view on pavement cycling is quite simple. I have no objection at all to young children,
when accompanied by an adult, cycling on a pavement. However, once those children grow a
little, I do object. If asked to come up with non-pavement-riding age, I'd say anyone over 10
should ride on the correct bit of tarmac: the road.

TR> IIRC fixed penalty notices for that offence cannot be issued to anyone under 16.

... and below about 10 years old courts will decide that people are not criminally responsible for
their actions.

--
.. he dominates the DECADENT SUBWAY SCENE.

Tony Raven said:

IIRC fixed penalty notices for that offence cannot be issued to anyone under
16.

Hi Tony

This being several years after they've all [*] become hooked on pavement cycling, lost their
virginity (I almost made a serious spelling error there) and started taking divers illegal drugs -
possibly all three at the same time.

Hrumph Back to the Daily Mail James

* for 'all', read 'some'

--
A credit limit is NOT a target.