Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Another broken Ritchey crank...

Started by Ron Ruff · · Last activity · 9 posts · 625 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
14 May 2007
Last activity
15 May 2007
Original author
Ron Ruff
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
625
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.whitemountainwheels.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/RitcheyPro1-.jpg

    I inspected them right before leaving for Gila, and didn't see
    anything unusual... but a mile from the finish on stage 3 the left arm
    snapped when I stood up. They had ~ 13,000 miles. No racing and hardly
    any sprinting on them either before Gila.

    Yes I crashed. It was right after a sharp turn though, so I was going
    less than 20mph and wasn't hurt badly... made it in on one leg. John
    Verheul loaned me the DA arm off his TT bike so I could continue the
    suffering...

  2. These cranks are junk. The firesale clearances of these cranks proves
    it. Girder structures apparently do not handle torsional stresses
    very well.

  3. Donald Gillies said:

    These cranks are junk. The firesale clearances of these cranks
    proves it. Girder structures apparently do not handle torsional
    stresses very well.

    They handle neither torsion nor lateral bending, the most common
    failure mode for cranks. This is mainly because most cranks are 8x
    stronger as levers in the plane of rotation than they are in lateral
    bending, the type of loading ignored by most crank designs.

    If you look at the failure pictures at:

    http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-001.html

    You'll see typical lateral failures, like the one to which you refer:

    http://tinyurl.com/2w5eep

    Jobst Brandt

  4. Ron Ruff said:

    http://www.whitemountainwheels.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/RitcheyPro1-.jpg

    predictably...

    Quoted message said:


    I inspected them right before leaving for Gila, and didn't see
    anything unusual... but a mile from the finish on stage 3 the left arm
    snapped when I stood up. They had ~ 13,000 miles. No racing and hardly
    any sprinting on them either before Gila.

    Yes I crashed. It was right after a sharp turn though, so I was going
    less than 20mph and wasn't hurt badly... made it in on one leg. John
    Verheul loaned me the DA arm off his TT bike so I could continue the
    suffering...

  5. Quoted message said:

    If you look at the failure pictures at:

    http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-001.html

    Jobst,

    One of the pictures mentions "vanity grooves" in tandem with strap
    wear as a cause of failure. Nothing to do with the OP, of course, but
    care to enlighten us to what a "vanity groove" is? I'm assuming it's
    not a dance track released by a celebrity, but I've been known to be
    pretty slow...

    thnx,
    Max

  6. landotter said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you look at the failure pictures at:

    http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-001.html

    Jobst,

    One of the pictures mentions "vanity grooves" in tandem with strap
    wear as a cause of failure. Nothing to do with the OP, of course, but
    care to enlighten us to what a "vanity groove" is? I'm assuming it's
    not a dance track released by a celebrity, but I've been known to be
    pretty slow...

    thnx,
    Max

    Dear Max,

    Take a normal rounded crank, roughly oval in cross-section.

    Now remove a wide groove of material from the side.

    Stamp "Colnago Ernesto" in the groove.

    The groove looks different, saves a few grams of weight that don't
    matter, lets the manufacturer display a name, and seems to lead to
    dramatic failures, so "vanity groove" is a good description.

    http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/crank-fail-013-014.jpg

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  7. landotter said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you look at the failure pictures at:

    http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-001.html

    Jobst,

    One of the pictures mentions "vanity grooves" in tandem with strap
    wear as a cause of failure. Nothing to do with the OP, of course, but
    care to enlighten us to what a "vanity groove" is? I'm assuming it's
    not a dance track released by a celebrity, but I've been known to be
    pretty slow...

    thnx,
    Max

    It's a relative of drillium. I would propose the name millium, material
    which has had grooves milled in its surface.

    In an attempt to make cranks lighter, some were milled along their outer
    face. The vanity comes in when you contrast the extra speed the
    reduction in weight gives you, to the higher risk of breakage. The
    amount of risk versus speed is something not easy to settle, but it's
    not difficult to envision the result of a broken left crank as you
    accelerate hard beside a big truck.

    --
    Ted Bennett

  8. Max Landotter said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you look at the failure pictures at:

    http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-001.html

    Quoted message said:

    One of the pictures mentions "vanity grooves" in tandem with strap
    wear as a cause of failure. Nothing to do with the OP, of course,
    but care to enlighten us to what a "vanity groove" is? I'm assuming
    it's not a dance track released by a celebrity, but I've been known
    to be pretty slow...

    The groove in the middle of the face of the crank reduces the
    torsional strength by about 50%. You'll note that Shimano and
    Campagnolo ceased machining these groves on their cranks a few years
    ago. Other manufacturers didn't catch on and make U-channel shape
    cranks that are even weaker in torsion and lateral bending.

    The groove has no positive function but people liked its looks.
    Therefore "vanity groove".

    Jobst Brandt

  9. Quoted message said:
    landotter said:

    On May 14, 8:30 pm, [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you look at the failure pictures at:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/FAIL-001.html

    Quoted message said:

    Jobst,

    Quoted message said:

    One of the pictures mentions "vanity grooves" in tandem with strap
    wear as a cause of failure. Nothing to do with the OP, of course, but
    care to enlighten us to what a "vanity groove" is? I'm assuming it's
    not a dance track released by a celebrity, but I've been known to be
    pretty slow...

    Quoted message said:

    thnx,
    Max

    Dear Max,

    Take a normal rounded crank, roughly oval in cross-section.

    Now remove a wide groove of material from the side.

    Stamp "Colnago Ernesto" in the groove.

    The groove looks different, saves a few grams of weight that don't
    matter, lets the manufacturer display a name, and seems to lead to
    dramatic failures, so "vanity groove" is a good description.

    http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-001/crank-fail-013-014.jpg

    D'oh!

    That's pretty obvious, now that ya mention it. One of my tri-weekly
    bikes has some vintage Suntour cranks circa '78 that have a vestigal
    vanity groove. It's only a mm deep and ~7mm wide. Perhaps one of their
    engineers figured that this was as much vanity as was sensible to risk.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.