"Mooshie peas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:44:51 +0100, "Derek F"
<[email hidden]> posted:
Quoted message said:
"Mooshie peas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:11:26 +0100, "Derek F"
<[email hidden]> posted:
>> The only way to see what is different is to read both papers, IME.
>>
>The SF. Herald and Examiner?
No the scientific papers that the articles were based on.
>> >I actually kept the page for reference for some years as it looked
as
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>> >if the company behind it might be an investment opportunity but
nothing
Quoted message said:>> >seemed to come of it.
>>
>> I do hope you were intending to read the study before you invested.
>>
>>
>Do you think that the companies involved would have sent me the
papers?
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:
Were they not published? I would be loathe to invest in a
pig-in-a-poke like that.
Is there any truth in my grannies other theory that Mushy Peas cause
wind?
Quoted message said:
Well I assume that the common name for peas as "musical fruit", when I
was a lad, would attest to this.
That would be beans, not peas.
"Beans, Beans, the magical fruit
Beans, Beans, they make you toot.
The more you toot, the better you feel,
So eat your Beans at every meal."
And/or
"Beans, Beans, they're good for your heart.
Beans, Beans, they make you fart.
The more you fart, the better you feel,
So eat your Beans at every meal."
--
x
"being the smartest window-licker on the shortbus doesn't make you a genius"