And The Weight Goes On

B. Lafferty said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

So how does criticizing his weight fit into your anti-doping agenda? He
looks about 175, not bad for 5'11".

-jet

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:12:26 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

you're an idiot

"Jet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

So how does criticizing his weight fit into your anti-doping agenda? He
looks about 175, not bad for 5'11".

Who said I was criticizing? That's your stupid, knee jerk response. I think
he does look better. Now if we could get Rasmussen to gain some
weight........

"D. Ferguson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:12:26 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

you're an idiot

Whatever you say, chump.

B. Lafferty said:

"Jet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

So how does criticizing his weight fit into your anti-doping agenda? He
looks about 175, not bad for 5'11".

Who said I was criticizing? That's your stupid, knee jerk response. I think
he does look better. Now if we could get Rasmussen to gain some
weight........

Since when have you posted something positive about him?

-jet

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:44:48 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"D. Ferguson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:12:26 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

you're an idiot

Whatever you say, chump.

sit down fatass

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

Quoted message said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

Quoted message said:

what I think might be interesting to note is that he is wearing a hrm. it
would seem he has something in mind.

Laz

Jet said:

B. Lafferty said:

"Jet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:12:26 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09
>
>http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

So how does criticizing his weight fit into your anti-doping agenda? He
looks about 175, not bad for 5'11".

Who said I was criticizing? That's your stupid, knee jerk response. I think
he does look better. Now if we could get Rasmussen to gain some
weight........

Since when have you posted something positive about him?

-jet

No, jet, you have completely misunderstood Lafferty's intentions. He
was posting a similar titled topic to one where it was discussed that
Armstrong might get fat like other retired pros but his subject was
not inteded to hack on Armstrong. Rather it was completely his
intention to point out how much better he looks now.

Can't you see?

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:59:01 -0400, "Laz" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

Quoted message said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

Quoted message said:

what I think might be interesting to note is that he is wearing a hrm. it
would seem he has something in mind.

Laz

Maybe, maybe not. I wear one and I don't have anything in mind.

Hell, Bush wears one and we know that dumbass doesn't have anything at
all in his mind.

Dude - aren't you Cat6? Who are you calling fatass?

Not that I agree with Lafferty, but it's pretty easy to see that Lance
has added a good 10+ pounds already - and as he states, that's probably
a good thing.

B. Lafferty said:

"Jet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02

So how does criticizing his weight fit into your anti-doping agenda? He
looks about 175, not bad for 5'11".

Who said I was criticizing? That's your stupid, knee jerk response. I think
he does look better. Now if we could get Rasmussen to gain some
weight........

.... or carry a friggin' water bottle on a 10% climb ... ;-)

Andrew F Martin said:

Dude - aren't you Cat6? Who are you calling fatass?

Not that I agree with Lafferty, but it's pretty easy to see that Lance
has added a good 10+ pounds already - and as he states, that's probably
a good thing.

Cat 7 to be exact.

And my fatass comment was sarcasm. Dumbass.

No [censored], that's he's added 10lbs. As in most off season photos he
looks softer. But it was Laffturdy's implications that he is headed
the way of past ex pros (getting chubby) that I was hacking on.

He only states that it's a good thing after being called on the carpet
for his first stupid remark.

Do you guys really care how much weight Lance has or has not gained??

What the hell? Are you all in 10th grade again?

Tom

D. Ferguson said:

Andrew F Martin said:

Dude - aren't you Cat6? Who are you calling fatass?

Not that I agree with Lafferty, but it's pretty easy to see that Lance
has added a good 10+ pounds already - and as he states, that's probably
a good thing.

Cat 7 to be exact.

And my fatass comment was sarcasm. Dumbass.

No [censored], that's he's added 10lbs. As in most off season photos he
looks softer. But it was Laffturdy's implications that he is headed
the way of past ex pros (getting chubby) that I was hacking on.

The interesting thing, among others, about Armstrong is that when he says
he likes riding his bike he really means it. I'd suspect that many pro
riders have a certain amount of love/hate about riding and once their
careers are over are happy never to get on a bike again (it's hard to blame
them).

So the photo seems to show that he's still into it, even if as a
professional hobby. Pretty cool.

-jet

"Tom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Do you guys really care how much weight Lance has or has not gained??

What the hell? Are you all in 10th grade again?

Tom

Tom, I think it's the last thought they have before they sleep and the first
when they wake up.

Lance, Lance, Lance! It's all about Lance!

Tom said:

Do you guys really care how much weight Lance has or has not gained??

What the hell? Are you all in 10th grade again?

Tom

For, and about professional (ex) bike racers it's a reasonable point of
discussion. You'll note that they obsess about every ounce, yet because of
their sport have prodigious, uh, feedings, or appetites. Imagine trying to
consume 10K calories during a GC.

-jet

"D. Ferguson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On 30 Sep 2005 08:54:34 -0700, "Andrew F Martin"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

No [censored], that's he's added 10lbs. As in most off season photos he
looks softer. But it was Laffturdy's implications that he is headed
the way of past ex pros (getting chubby) that I was hacking on.

He only states that it's a good thing after being called on the carpet
for his first stupid remark.

ROTFL!

routebeer said:

Tom, I think it's the last thought they have before they sleep and the first
when they wake up.

Lance, Lance, Lance! It's all about Lance!

This is simply a change in strategy for his endorsements. Soon there'll
be a new line of Lance "relaxed fit" products for the discriminating
mature cyclist who demands high-priced cycling goods for those
critically important charity rides.

Tom said:

Do you guys really care how much weight Lance has or has not gained??

What the hell? Are you all in 10th grade again?

Tom

No, I don't care how much weight Lance gains.

I care about pointing out how dumb and obsessed Laffturdy is.

What grade does it make you, to join in on this thread?

If you don't care, shut the hell up.

D