UK and Europe · Public discussion

and another one

Started by Lardy Ninja · · Last activity · 10 posts · 1,224 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
31 January 2003
Last activity
1 February 2003
Original author
Lardy Ninja
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,224
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. news.bbc.co.uk2714433.stm

    NB He was banned from driving for life; for driving while disqualified, not for the fact that he
    killed two people.

    LN

  2. lardy ninja said:

    NB He was banned from driving for life; for driving while disqualified, not for the fact that he
    killed two people.

    On the plus side, at least he was put away for manslaughter.

    I can't help thinking it seems a bit futile to ban someone from driving for driving while banned :-/

    --
    Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( juggler.netdanny ) Recumbent cycle page:
    speedy5.freeserve.co.ukrecumbents "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
    Thomas Paine

  3. In message <[email hidden]>, lardy ninja
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    news.bbc.co.uk2714433.stm

    NB He was banned from driving for life; for driving while disqualified, not for the fact that he
    killed two people.


    Eh? Not wishing to seem to be a car apologist, but in the URL it says

    He was jailed for eight years on each count of manslaughter, the sentences to run concurrently.

    Unless the story has been re-written since you posted.

    Graham
    --
    Graham Glen

  4. Graham Glen said:

    In message <[email hidden]>, lardy ninja
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    news.bbc.co.uk2714433.stm

    NB He was banned from driving for life; for driving while disqualified, not for the fact that he
    killed two people.


    Eh? Not wishing to seem to be a car apologist, but in the URL it says

    He was jailed for eight years on each count of manslaughter, the sentences to run concurrently.

    But the lifetime driving ban is for driving while disqualified. I guess when he gets out, drives
    while disqualified and has another crash, he'll get a double ban with bells on.

    James

  5. In message <[email hidden]>, James Annan <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Graham Glen said:

    In message <[email hidden]>, lardy ninja
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    news.bbc.co.uk2714433.stm

    NB He was banned from driving for life; for driving while disqualified, not for the fact that he
    killed two people.


    Eh? Not wishing to seem to be a car apologist, but in the URL it says He was jailed for eight
    years on each count of manslaughter, the sentences to run concurrently.

    But the lifetime driving ban is for driving while disqualified.

    Does it really matter why he was banned?

    He was convicted if manslaughter,, maybe you can't be banned from driving for that offence (since
    you can cause manslaughter in many ways). Hence being charged with and convicted of the driving
    while disqualified offence

    --
    Chris French, Leeds

  6. "Danny Colyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    lardy ninja said:

    NB He was banned from driving for life; for driving while disqualified, not for the fact that he
    killed two people.

    On the plus side, at least he was put away for manslaughter.

    I can't help thinking it seems a bit futile to ban someone from driving for driving while
    banned :-/

    I would have thought driving while banned was a clear case of contempt of court -- at which point
    can't the judge can pretty much make up the sentance? Certainly worth a bang to rights and throw
    away the key!!

  7. Tony W said:
    Quoted message said:

    On the plus side, at least he was put away for manslaughter.

    Quoted message said:

    I would have thought driving while banned was a clear case of contempt of court -- at which point
    can't the judge can pretty much make up the sentance? Certainly worth a bang to rights and throw
    away the key!!

    The "advantage" of a manslaughter charge in this case, AIUI, is that under the Rehabilitation of
    Offenders Act it will never become a spent conviction.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  8. James Annan said:

    But the lifetime driving ban is for driving while disqualified. I guess when he gets out, drives
    while disqualified and has another crash, he'll get a double ban with bells on.

    Just so. And he had his children in the car with him! Cut his goolies off. Retrospectively if
    possible. He doesn't deserve to have children. He is a selfish pile of ordure who is not fit to be
    part of a civilised society.

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  9. In message <[email hidden]>, James Annan <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Graham Glen said:

    In message <[email hidden]>, lardy ninja
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    news.bbc.co.uk2714433.stm

    NB He was banned from driving for life; for driving while disqualified, not for the fact that he
    killed two people.


    Eh? Not wishing to seem to be a car apologist, but in the URL it says He was jailed for eight
    years on each count of manslaughter, the sentences to run concurrently.

    But the lifetime driving ban is for driving while disqualified. I guess when he gets out, drives
    while disqualified and has another crash, he'll get a double ban with bells on.

    Sorry, didn't have my reading head on. Comes from cycling home from the pub I suppose.

    Graham
    --
    Graham Glen

  10. chris French said:

    In message <[email hidden]>, James Annan <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Graham Glen said:

    In message <[email hidden]>, lardy ninja <[email hidden]>
    writes

    > news.bbc.co.uk2714433.stm
    >
    > NB He was banned from driving for life; for driving while disqualified, not for the fact that
    > he killed two people.
    >
    Eh? Not wishing to seem to be a car apologist, but in the URL it says He was jailed for eight
    years on each count of manslaughter, the sentences to run concurrently.

    But the lifetime driving ban is for driving while disqualified.

    Does it really matter why he was banned?

    Yes. The objectionable point is that he doesn't get banned for killing people, but for the
    essentially technical offence of driving while disqualified. And since he alrady ignored the first
    ban, the second one seems rather futile.

    James

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.