In article <[email hidden]>,
Mike Tennent said:(Lyndon) said:There was a
interrview with the CEO of Saucony recently where he said that marathons aren't
about winning anymore, they're about finishing.
I imagine that carries across the board to 5K's - 15K's.
I'd be interested to see if the average speed of what might be called
the "good" (non-elite) runners has slowed over the last 10 - 15 years
or so. The guys and gals who make up, say, the next 1/3 of the field
behind the "elite" runners.
In other words, has the "hard core" runner (non-elites) slowed on the
average?
I don't have the documentation, but I've looked some at results.
If you take a fixed time, whether 2:20 marathon, or 2:40, or 40 minute
10k, or a 12 minute 2 mile (HS track from bygone days), etc., then
in general, you do see fewer people, absolutely, and even more so,
relatively, beating that time level.
At the very top, say the 9 minutes for 2 miles level in HS, the
difference doesn't seem to be as great today vs. 25 years ago. At
10 minutes, it's a stronger change. And at 12, it's blazingly obvious.
(Guess what I ran back then, and was 9th on my team. Today, 12 would
be something like 9th in the conference most years, vs. something like
50th then.)
You also see far, far too many races being won by guys in their 40's.
Granted, experience does count for something. But 40-something guys,
even very good and hard training 40-something guys, really _ought_ to
be getting their clocks cleaned by good area 30-something guys. The
younger crowd has both time to have developed experience, and youth to
take full advantage of it. Still, a lot of the top 5 at area races is
filled by the 40-something guys. It's less of a difference among the
women, but women's running 25 years ago was not as strong as men's.
--
Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links.
Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much
evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they
would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences