Road Cycling · Public discussion

Alternative/noseless saddles

Started by Darrell Criswel · · Last activity · 7 posts · 1,514 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
16 December 2003
Last activity
17 December 2003
Original author
Darrell Criswel
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,514
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Does anyone have any experience with alternative saddles which do not have a nose like the
    Hobson saddle?

    It seems most discomfort comes from the pressure the saddle exerts in the perineal region. I do not
    have any pain from regular saddles I am seeking something more comfortable and that does not exert
    pressure in the perineal area.

    What are the disadvantages to saddles without a nose?

    Thanks

  2. Darrell Criswell said:

    What are the disadvantages to saddles without a nose?

    Try riding with no hands.

  3. "Darrell Criswell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone have any experience with alternative saddles which do not have a nose like the
    Hobson saddle?


    (snip)

    Quoted message said:

    What are the disadvantages to saddles without a nose?

    Mostly that you look like a douchebag.

    Thanks, Hold my

  4. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Darrell Criswell said:

    What are the disadvantages to saddles without a nose?

    Try riding with no hands.

    Had I neither nose nor hands the saddle would be the least of my problems.

  5. Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    Try riding with no hands.

    Had I neither nose nor hands the saddle would be the least of my problems.

    I knew it would give confusion. Is "with both hands off the handle-bar" really the shortest way of
    saying it properly?

  6. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    Try riding with no hands.

    Had I neither nose nor hands the saddle would be the least of my problems.

    I knew it would give confusion. Is "with both hands off the handle-bar" really the shortest way of
    saying it properly?

    How would I know? I don't talk English good as you.

  7. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Quoted message said:

    Try riding with no hands.

    Had I neither nose nor hands the saddle would be the least of my problems.

    I knew it would give confusion. Is "with both hands off the handle-bar" really the shortest way of
    saying it properly?

    No that would just add to the confusion, wondering which bar you are actually handling. Maybe hands-
    free would be catchy in these days of communicating everywhere. Riding "hands free" would then imply
    "you are talking on your cell phone without holding on to the bike anywhere". "Hands busy" of course
    would mean you are talking on your cell phone without holding on to it because you can't let go of
    the bike due to the fact that your saddle doesn't have a nose and you have no balance whatsoever.

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.