"C.Health" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:KMDXe.9327$%i1.6496@trnddc09...
Quoted message said:http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/magazine/daily/12442205.htm
A Harvard study released in January found that 35 percent of Americans had
used some form of alternative healing. The National Center for
Complementary
and Alternative Medicine, part of the National Institutes of Health, found
that more Americans were using yoga, meditation, herbs, special diets and
other methods.
If the number who believe in the healing power of prayer is added, the
study
shows, close to two-thirds of Americans have sought something other than
doctors and medicine to treat physical ills.
"People are not happy with Western medical treatment and are seeking
alternatives," said Babette Galang, complementary health officer ....."
That is not true, and not even made more true by such statistics. Very few
people use "alternatives" as a true alternative to mainstream care. All
except a few per cent use it as an add-on to normal medicine, or for
specific complaints only. All studies show that.
The latter may be serious illnesses for which medicine has no good answers
yet, in which case they are usually used out of desperation and acute need,
rather than any confidence that the alternatives have worth.
And those using yoga and meditation may think that these things may make
them feel and function better in some ways, but without really thinking of
them as medical treatments. They will still see doctors when they are
sick.
Most using alternatives have never really thought about the scientific
divides that dominate discussion here. They are of no importance to them
in the myriads of day-to-day contexts within which a remedy may be sought
for some complaint or other. They thus will try out almost any remedy on
almost any level of recommendation, and will end up having no true idea as
to whether they have any intrinsic biomedical activity or not, when studies
show that sham treatments can appear to "work" 50% or more of the time.
The fact is that after some thirty years of intense interest and
investigation of "alternatives", it is difficult to think of any important
contribution they, or any "alternative" concepts, have made to medical
care.
Peter Moran
Quoted message said: