UK and Europe · Public discussion

alternating chains!

Started by gary · · Last activity · 48 posts · 2,752 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
27 March 2005
Last activity
1 April 2005
Original author
gary
Posts
48
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,752
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–48 of 48
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On 30 Mar 2005 07:57:49 GMT, "Arthur Clune" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Having seen someone headbutt the tarmac after there chain slipped off the
    front chainring when powering uphill (it was a very worn chainring) I'm
    pretty cautious about replacing mine.

    Ditto. Plus you get chain suck and nasty noises and all manner of
    other foolishness.

    If I cared that much about saving the price of a ring I'd use steel
    rings anyway. I still think a visibly hooked ring should be replaced
    with the chain.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

  2. On 30 Mar 2005 08:01:10 GMT, "Arthur Clune" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    One point that's often overlooked is that the way to lube a chain with oil
    is to lube it, leave it for a while and then *wipe the chain with a clean
    dry rag* to remove most of the oil on the outside of the chain.

    Absolutely. Especially if you use wax lube - that's best left
    overnight for the volatiles to evaporate. Since I started being more
    disciplined about that I've had to put much less lube on the chain.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

  3. Just zis Guy said:

    Arthur Clune wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Having seen someone headbutt the tarmac after there chain slipped
    off the front chainring when powering uphill (it was a very worn
    chainring) I'm pretty cautious about replacing mine.

    Ditto. Plus you get chain suck and nasty noises and all manner of
    other foolishness.

    Maybe I'm lucky but I never get any of that. The one and only ring I
    completely wore out just eventually caused a little skip that did no harm.
    (Other rings were only changed because I switched to different sizes or
    models).

    ~PB

  4. Pete Biggs <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : [re accidents, chain suck and noises]
    : Maybe I'm lucky but I never get any of that. The one and only ring I
    : completely wore out just eventually caused a little skip that did no harm.
    : (Other rings were only changed because I switched to different sizes or
    : models).

    I've never had a problem with chainsuck on the road bike. It does become
    a problem on the MTB when the rings get worn. Obviously that's a very testing
    environment though. It's usually the combination of worn rings + mud on the
    chain/rings that does it.

    For the accident stuff, it only tends to happen when jumping hard out
    of the saddle in a big gear, and I get the impression you don't ride
    like that.

    As ever, horses for courses.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
    Don't get me wrong, perl is an OK operating system, but it lacks a
    lightweight scripting language -- Walter Dnes

  5. Just zis Guy said:

    If I cared that much about saving the price of a ring I'd use steel
    rings anyway. I still think a visibly hooked ring should be replaced
    with the chain.

    I've got a steel inner which is about twelve years old and still in
    purrrrfect wurrrrking orrrderrr. Doesn't get a huge amount of use these
    days but used to see a fair bit of MTB duty.

    --

    Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/
    World Domination?
    Just find a world that's into that kind of thing, then chain to the
    floor and walk up and down on it in high heels. (Mr. Sunshine)

  6. Arthur Clune said:

    For the accident stuff, it only tends to happen when jumping hard out
    of the saddle in a big gear, and I get the impression you don't ride
    like that.

    I do* give it some big welly on occasion, briefly (for a few revs). I
    think you'd need a lot of bad luck and a /severely/ knackered chainring
    for the chain to suddenly come off like that (and front mech problems are
    often to blame as well), but of course I understand the caution and desire
    to replace rings to prevent that. It's just that I suspect that some
    people are changing them far, far sooner than they need to, partly over a
    misunderstanding re wear.

    * except not right now as I'm still recovering from injury, but I do often
    normally when I want to quickly take off or accelerate. True that I'm
    more of a High-Cadence Seated Twiddler when it comes to hill climbing,
    though.

    ~PB

  7. Arthur Clune said:

    I've never had a problem with chainsuck on the road bike. It does
    become a problem on the MTB when the rings get worn. Obviously that's
    a very testing environment though. It's usually the combination of
    worn rings + mud on the chain/rings that does it.

    For the accident stuff, it only tends to happen when jumping hard out
    of the saddle in a big gear, and I get the impression you don't ride
    like that.

    I was occasionally getting chain suck on the Galaxy when changing from
    big to middle when the rings got very worn. The skipping on the large
    ring was getting dangerous by the time I replaced the chainset. With a
    brand new Stronglight chainset, a new SRAM chain and a new Shimano
    cassette I still get chainsuck when changing from big to middle unless
    I'm careful to soft pedal. It's quite an unpleasant experience,
    stopping the cranks dead. It's abrupt enough to have bent three of the
    teeth on the big ring out of line towards the middle one.

    --
    Dave...

  8. Might have to get one of those!, a handy money saving tool!, it shivers me
    that i've bought cassettes, chainrings & chains that i needn't have!, by the
    way, whats chainsuck!!!?
    Paulmouk <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "gary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi
    I used to fit a chain, rear cassette, & chain rings & find out that when


    the

    Quoted message said:

    chain wears out, i have to replace not just the chain, but the whole


    lot!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    costly [censored] man!
    Is it just me that does this, but by running a couple of chains,
    alternating them, extends the wear from the gearing !
    Does anyone else do this, is it common knowledge! & how often do you all


    run

    Quoted message said:

    each chains between alternating!
    Cheers

    I used to do that but now I don't bother. I bought a Rohloff Caliber?


    chain

    Quoted message said:

    checker a few years ago and now replace chains at 0.75% elongation.
    The check only takes a couple of seconds to carry out.
    I haven't had to replace a cassette since.

    Paul.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.