After re-considering my reasons for going to a 'bent, I have come to the
conclusion that I may very well be happier with a SWB bike, as opposed
to a CLWB or LWB.
My reasoning behind this is:
1) Most of the SWB (26/r 20/f) bikes I have looked at have seat heights
similar to LWB bike.
2) The SWBs' have a somewhat higher BB height, which from what I have
read makes them somewhat more aerodynamic than a LWB with a lower BB height.
3) Most of the SWBs' I have seen are somewhat lighter than the LWBs' I
have seen (and can afford).
I have seen a whole bunch of models under $1200 in the SWB configuration
that seen as though they would make a good choice for a relative
beginner such as myself.
Some of the models I have seen:
Rans Rocket
ActionBent litespeed metro, Jetstream, Roadrunner
Lightning Thunderbolt
Bacchetta Giro 20 (a bit above $1200, but not completely out of the
question)
Volae Tour
Ok, so what is the opinion on these bikes vs some of the CLWB or LWB
bikes such as:
Sun EZ-1 and EZ-Sport
Rans Tailwind and Stratus
Cycle Genius Starling, Sparrow and Falcon
And last but not least the Easy Racer Tour Easy.
Thanks
Ken
--
You never have the wind with you - either it is against you or you're
having a good day. ~Daniel Behrman, The Man Who Loved Bicycles
Homepage: http://kcm-home.tripod.com/