Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

After more thought

Started by Ken C. M. · · Last activity · 4 posts · 643 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
6 February 2006
Last activity
8 February 2006
Original author
Ken C. M.
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
643
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. After re-considering my reasons for going to a 'bent, I have come to the
    conclusion that I may very well be happier with a SWB bike, as opposed
    to a CLWB or LWB.

    My reasoning behind this is:

    1) Most of the SWB (26/r 20/f) bikes I have looked at have seat heights
    similar to LWB bike.

    2) The SWBs' have a somewhat higher BB height, which from what I have
    read makes them somewhat more aerodynamic than a LWB with a lower BB height.

    3) Most of the SWBs' I have seen are somewhat lighter than the LWBs' I
    have seen (and can afford).

    I have seen a whole bunch of models under $1200 in the SWB configuration
    that seen as though they would make a good choice for a relative
    beginner such as myself.

    Some of the models I have seen:

    Rans Rocket

    ActionBent litespeed metro, Jetstream, Roadrunner

    Lightning Thunderbolt

    Bacchetta Giro 20 (a bit above $1200, but not completely out of the
    question)

    Volae Tour

    Ok, so what is the opinion on these bikes vs some of the CLWB or LWB
    bikes such as:

    Sun EZ-1 and EZ-Sport

    Rans Tailwind and Stratus

    Cycle Genius Starling, Sparrow and Falcon

    And last but not least the Easy Racer Tour Easy.

    Thanks
    Ken

    --
    You never have the wind with you - either it is against you or you're
    having a good day. ~Daniel Behrman, The Man Who Loved Bicycles

    Homepage: http://kcm-home.tripod.com/

  2. Your reasing is flawed.

    The only reason a person should decide between a SWB and LWB is on what
    he plans on using the bike for. If you are planning oin the short ride
    around town, commuting and/or , short fast rides, the swb is the better
    bike to have. If however you are looking for comfort, touring and
    speed is not a concern you would want to be looking at the LWB
    bikes.....A CLWB is one that can't make up is mind

  3. I have a Linear LWB, and I prefer it over all of my other bikes for
    longer rides. It's OK in town, but of course not as nimble in traffic.
    The LWB is the classic for touring, as they tend to give a more stable
    and comfy ride. But I know two people with SWB (both Streetmachines)
    with the underseat panniers and they love them for big trips.

    The Rans Tailwind is probably great for around town, but I don't know
    if anyone has toured with it. The Stratus and the Tour Easy are famous
    bikes for the open road, and both have fairly upright seats (as does my
    Linear). But I don't mind riding my LWB around town, as I've gotten
    qute used to how it handles. I cannot comment on the other machines you
    mention, as I've never seen them. For in-town riding I prefer a low-BB
    design, making it easier to put my foot down in sudden stops.
    Actually, for most of my in-town riding I've gone back to an upright,
    because it's more nimble and I can lock it up without worrying nearly
    as much.

    Buying a bent is just like buying an upright bike - what do you want it
    to do? Just get groceries, or go for long rides on the weekend, or
    take part in local time trials, or go off-road and play in the mud?

    That said, the best advice I've ever heard (and received) is to try as
    many as you can. Some folks look at the Tour Easy design and say
    "that's what I want!", but after trying it and others over an afternoon
    they then come out of the store with a SWB!

    Mark

  4. RIDE AS MANY AS YOU CAN GET UNDER YOUR BUTT!

    Best advice I received. The learning curve accelerates as you test ride. My experience has been that bikes which were "nice" to "really nice" when I first started testing were soon "boring", "too much effort" or "what did I like about this slug?".

    Seat angle is critical!!! At every bike shop I visited the high racers were displayed with the seat laid 'way back. These adjust. Get them upright when you are new and the high racers suddenly become much less strange and easier to ride. Personally I like the higher seat, rapid acceleration and high cruise. The first time on a dual 26 I could barely keep it stable primarily due to a laid back seat.

    Unless you are a lottery winner none of the better bikes fall into the chump change catagory. Take your time, get the shops to fit you and try everything you can get you seat on.

    Anything you think you like, ride longer.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.