"John Edser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:PF:- Where did you get the idea from that I think I am
not AEVASIVE?
Quoted message said:JE:- Then you are just another Cretan that has been
telling us for nearly 2000 years that all Cretans are
lairs. Can we believe you or not?
PF:- Show me an example of were I wrote/inferred something
to the effect of
that
Quoted message said:I am "not AEVASIVE"!
JE:- Can't you see that if you say "All Cretans are Liars
(i.e. are AEVASIVE) and YOU are a Cretan
(i.e. you are being AEVASIVE by just suggesting
it) that just _zero_ content is contained within such
nonsense?
An AEVASIVE person cannot claim they know that they and
everybody else is being AEVASIVE, only a TESTED to be NON
AEVASIVE person can validly claim such a thing.
THUS:- Either: YOU claim to be a TESTED NON AEVASIVE
person allowing a "holier than thou" attitude, or you
include yourself (as you have done) and just end up
absolutely contradicting yourself,
i.e. you and your AEVASIVE theory both enter Epimenides
Paradox and-just-never-come-out.
EPT (~ the sum total of often embarrassing textual tracks
left by me that show how I have perversely selectively
Hibernated by explaining AEVASIVE) does conceptually
crystalize the reasons for, and uncover the specific
categories (easily exemplifiable and in general logically
definable such) of the natural causes behind why always
being (or becoming) 'visceromotorially' and emotionally
reactive and cognitively "realistically pessimistic" (a
pessimism/hopelessness based on the totality of available
sensory clues - past as well as present) has at least up
till now (in our phylogeny) BEEN MALADAPTIVE.
The concept AEVASIVE refers to the evolutionary and
functional principles that normally prevent a completely
realistic (or philosophically over-the-top open-eyedness ;-)
pessimism.
AEVASIVE is AS PARTLY EVIDENCED by e.g. many decades of
clinical NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL observations of the
specialization of the dominant and subdominant hemispheres
(their frontal cortices especially) at, in respect of the
former, representing positive, optimistic, humorous, and
labyrinthine lingual means of leading (shunting) and
explaining away and putting "a lid" on potential largely non-
AEVASIVE 'sad' psychoemotional and visceromotor reactions
(or focuses of actention) of the latter.
Beyond perfectly workable functions by which we habituate to
repeated *insignificant* (or neither potentially sooner nor
later distressing) stimuli, a consistently "non-AEVASIVE"
overall motivation and omni-directional cognitive conscious
awareness (including introverted insights that results from
fluent functional integration of neurons at different
phylogenetically evolved, and, ideally, fully
ontogenetically developed, *levels of consciousness* -
thereby forging what may be called a "feeling
consciousness"😉 HAS NEVER - in our phylogeny - BEEN and
ADAPTIVE 'attitude' (so to speak).
----------
You could of course always argue that I should be more
merciful to you (and others) and refrain for poiniting this
aspect of our phylogeny out. You could rightly so, since it
is as I just boldly wrote without shouting.
I know that the existence of a percEPTively spotted and
aptly concEPTualized view of the AEVASIVE aspect of human
evolution and our genophenotype is utterly impossible
according to Edserian dogma.
But it is a knowledge I - and I hope you - can easily learn
to live with.
%-]
On that invitation to an upbeat and not too discordant last
note, I hereby end this retort!
P
