Whats the most overrated piece of advice given to first-time time trialists - is it to focus on aerodynamics, invest in a TT bike, or to obsess over marginal gains, and why do so many people swear by these methods despite the fact that most TT courses are won by a handful of seconds, and often by riders on standard road bikes with clip-on bars. Do people really think that saving 10 watts by shaving their legs is going to make a difference when the real difference is in the training and the mental toughness.
Is it just me or are TT bikes becoming a status symbol, with people buying them just to look the part rather than actually putting in the work to get faster, and whats the point of spending thousands of dollars on a bike thats only going to be used for a handful of events per year.
And dont even get me started on the whole aero is everything crowd - I mean, come on, if aero was really that important, wouldnt we see more TT bikes with full fairings and enclosed wheels, like the ones used in the UCI hour record attempts.
Im not trying to be contrarian, but it seems to me that a lot of the advice given to first-time time trialists is based on myths and misconceptions, and that people are more interested in looking the part than actually putting in the work to get faster. So, whats the most overrated piece of advice given to first-time time trialists, and why do so many people swear by it despite the lack of evidence.