In article <[email hidden]>,
Debra D said:Quoted message said:Usual advice is to alternate harder and easier days, NOT
to do the same every day.
The wait should be 48+ hours between harder efforts.
You could even push harder once a week and rest or
crosstrain the next day.
Ok....but I assume with what I am doing which is not so
much (in my opinion), I dont need to wait 48 hours between?
Or should I just do walking on off days?
The question isn't whether it's a lot compared to
your intentions, or what other people do. It's an
issue of whether it's a lot compared to what your
body is ready to do.
One check is to keep a log of your workouts and record
what you do and how you felt. After a while, you'll be
able to see what is a 'lot' at any given time (doing that
much for a while gives you a string of 'felt like !@$#'
in the log).
If the current workout represents a 'lot', then, yes, you
may well need 48 hours between workouts. Training occurs
after giving your body a stress (the walk/run) and
RECOVER(!!) -- time for the body to rebuild the muscles,
etc., in adaptation to that training stress. 48 hours
might be over-conservative, and 36 enough. Even 24 _might_
be. Again, your log will tell you.
I'm being reminded of the fact that what constitutes a
hard workout depends on your training level. Tonight I'll
be doing a 'hard' workout that a year ago this time, I'd
have considered relaxing.
--
Robert Grumbine radix.net~bobgOpen ↗ Science faqs and
amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo
Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much
evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less
appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a
more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences