admin of cycling forums

TimC said:

Can someone tell me the email address of the admin of cycling forums?

Maybe you should of considered the question before asking it? Like why ask it via NG, when basic investigation would prompt you to go here first:
http://www.cyclingforums.com/

When viewing the hompage, you would view "Feedback", with a sub-forum:

Tell us what you think!
http://www.cyclingforums.com/f35-tell-us-what-you-think!.html

Use your noggin & don't simply rely upon techno retrogrouch to supply you with a answer. 🙄

cfsmtb said:

Use your noggin & don't simply rely upon techno retrogrouch to supply you with a answer. 🙄

So in short... FFS STFU RTFM!? 😄

cheers,
GPL

gplama said:

So in short... FFS STFU RTFM!? 😄

Was going to respond but l33t is sooooo two years ago. 😄

BTW: Tim gets the msg: Non RFC compliant usenet messages
http://www.cyclingforums.com/t316401-non-rfc-compliant-usenet-messages.html

On 2006-01-31, gplama (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

Quoted message said:

cfsmtb said:

Use your noggin & don't simply rely upon techno retrogrouch to supply
you with a answer. 🙄

So in short... FFS STFU RTFM!? 😄

OMFGWTFBBQ!

--
TimC
Entropy isn't what it used to be.

On 31/01/06 at 14:13:24 TimC somehow managed to type:

Quoted message said:

Can someone tell me the email address of the admin of cycling forums?

It's playing silly buggers with high bits in usenet headers, which
confuses at least some newsreaders and servers (hence why that Roy and
HG thread disappeared completely from my view, and I just notcied that
Marx SS's MTB post disappeared also), and is possibly illegal
according to the USENET specs.

Hi TimC - you might[1] also want to have a go at them about their
subject threading which is currently CRAPPY.

Of course I'd do it myself if I did NOT have to register in order to
complain. Now I know why I prefer USENET unadulterated by various forum
debris...

[1] Of course you also might not and for that I can't say I blame you -
if the web site had been (shudder) properly tested before being
unleashed......

--
Humbug
BE A LOOF! (There has been a recent population explosion of lerts.)

Quoted message said:

Use your noggin & don't simply rely upon techno retrogrouch to supply

"techno retrogrouch".

Now I've seen it all ;-)

cfsmtb said:

BTW: Tim gets the msg: Non RFC compliant usenet messages
http://tinyurl.com/dxkvr

Thanks for posting the link - Tim's feedback post points back to the
missing posts (I don't see them either). I would have missed out on the
Roy and HG post! A classic!

--
John
Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from
some farcical aquatic ceremony.

On 2006-01-31, John Pitts (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

Quoted message said:

cfsmtb said:

BTW: Tim gets the msg: Non RFC compliant usenet messages
http://tinyurl.com/dxkvr

Thanks for posting the link - Tim's feedback post points back to the
missing posts (I don't see them either). I would have missed out on the
Roy and HG post! A classic!

I only joined er.... [censored] gaga... lastweek, and I am almost
immediately presented with a number of rather brilliant stories and
posts. Bunch o' commedians!

But that Roy and HJ one had me going for quite a few paragraphs. I
don't think it was until he was talking about riding a fixie that I
definitely worked out this wasn't quite real. It read just like I
remember Roy and HJ -- although I rarely listen to them because I
dislike sport in general. Now if they talked about fixies more often,
I might listen to them more, of course 🙂

--
TimC
Hacking's just another word for nothing left to kludge.