We've discussed adjustable cranks for Coker rides before and I have
another progress report. Last October, I 'posted'
(tinyurl.com225arOpen ↗) about the tests of a Murray prototype and
the fact that I had ordered a set from 'High Sierra Cycle Center'
(hscycle.comhscycle.comOpen ↗).
I've been using these cranks for a little while and they
look promising. Take this with a grain of salt as I feel
that I need to put 500 hard miles on these cranks before I
really trust them. But so far so good...
Details: Aluminum crank body, stainless steel adjustable
pieces slides in and locks down with two hex bolts
Adjustment is 120mm to 160mm in 2.5mm steps Adjustment takes
<30 seconds, done with 3/16" hex Taper fits Suzue hub
perfectly - 113mm 2 degree taper Cranks are 9mm wider than
Bicycle Euro Removing requires a long socket to reach the
deeply recessed bolt - also many crank removal tools won't
fit. VERY high quality workmanship throughout. Cost: see
'website' (hscycle.comhscycle.comOpen ↗), but it appears the sale
they had last fall is no longer in progress so they are more
expensive now. You can get them without the spider and with
various lengths. Call and talk to the manufacturer as he is
a good guy.
Test rides so far: 160mm: three rides, longest was 16
miles/1500' 120mm: two short 3 mile rides (including 18%
climbs) 130mm: one 7 mile ride, 4 miles dirt, including lots
of steep stuff
Now this is not much riding, but the results are very
promising. Especially today, set at 130mm - it felt SO
nice. My first impression trying these was that they
somehow make the ride smoother. Maybe it's the fact that
each pedal is now 9mm further out from the wheel? I am
already using a wide hub, so it's pretty amazing that even
wider feels better...
The aluminum part that bolts onto the hub fits better than
any other aluminum crank I've ever used. Just tighten it up
and it's good - doesn't need retightening after a ride or
two - very nice. Not quite so nice is the fact that I am not
able to use all my many pairs of pedals with these cranks.
The threads just don't accept certain pairs (especially the
Atomlabs I wanted to use). I took them down to my LBS and
ran through with the tapping tool and can now use several,
but not all pairs. No big deal I guess. They are of course
heavier than normal cranks, but then that was obvious -
sorry didn't weigh them yet. Another slight drawback is that
you can't use a regular crankbolt remover to get at the bolt
- it's deeply recessed.
There are a couple of photos in my 'cycles gallery'
(community.webshots.com29172825KykoOOuIOYOpen ↗) and
I've attached another image of them here, showing one at
120mm and the other at 160mm.
I know of several other efforts at adjustable cranks. Ed
Mosiman made a beautiful set that works really well for
Bronson on his 'Creative Gecko deluxe touring machine.'
(tinyurl.com26nyOpen ↗) Scot Cooper had a friend make a
pair for him, but it had thin aluminum parts and he didn't
end up using it. Plus of course the 'Murray Tour de Force'
(tinyurl.com259prOpen ↗) ones I already mentioned (which I
hope are improved from the early prototype I tried - but
haven't heard). Five years ago, Daniel Hopkins tried using
tandem cranks that had 3 holes at different lengths - they
might actually be ok, but I really like the finer adjustment
and avoiding rethreading the pedal every time (and not
carrying a pedal wrench).
---Nathan
+-------------------------------------------------------
---------+
| Attachment filename: dscn0013croplevelsmall.jpg
| |
|Download attachment:
unicyclist.com198565Open ↗| +-------------------------------------------------------
---------+
--
nathan - BIG rides: Muni & Coker
------------------------------------------------------------------------
nathan's Profile: unicyclist.com251Open ↗
View this thread: unicyclist.com31218Open ↗