ACT: No helmet + no lights = Death wish...?

"Adam F" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

<rant>
What the hell's going on in Canberra (or everywhere, for all I know) since
daylight saving ended?

It might be time to resurrect those "If you don't need a head, you don't
need a helmet" ads - every second person I ride past after work recently
has either no lights, no helmet, or neither (and often is listening to an
ipod for good measure).

Surely tangling with another rider or a car is only a matter of time for
these people.

Question is, should I just shrug and leave them to Darwin's theory or yell
out the odd "get some lights you nutbag"? I mean, a basic flashing rear
light costs what, $10? Surely they've had time by now to notice it's dark
after work/uni....

Actually, it probably wouldn't bother me so much if I didn't keep almost
running into these slow-moving dingbats - they're not very good at keeping
left - quelle surprise.
</rant>

Sorry, I feel better now 😉

--
//Adam F

Perhaps they are in stealth mode. I've seen a few of those around my neck
of the woods. On my commute home along the Yarra I quite often encounter
skilled backwards riding cyclists also. You know the ones...they have a red
flshing light on the front to confuse the cars into thinking they are going
in the opposite direction.

P

That was a remarkably coherent rant, Adam! ;-)

Just forget about 'em, life's too short to be worrying about people
who should know better.

How did you get on with your axles?

BTH

Adam F said:

<rant>
What the hell's going on in Canberra (or everywhere, for all I know)
since daylight saving ended?

It might be time to resurrect those "If you don't need a head, you
don't need a helmet" ads - every second person I ride past after work
recently has either no lights, no helmet, or neither (and often is
listening to an ipod for good measure).

Surely tangling with another rider or a car is only a matter of time
for these people.

Question is, should I just shrug and leave them to Darwin's theory

Yep.

Theo

BT Humble said:

That was a remarkably coherent rant, Adam! ;-)

Just forget about 'em, life's too short to be worrying about people
who should know better.

How did you get on with your axles?

BTH

Thanks BTH, you're probably right 🙂

Being the lazy sod I am, I decided to go for an effort-saving kludge and
use a BMX-style chain tensioner to keep the QR in place! It's still on
order at Bike Culture, but they reckon it'll do the trick and others
swear by the Surly Tuggnut (an exxier version of the same thing).

--
//Adam F

Paul Yates said:

On my commute home along the Yarra I quite often encounter skilled backwards riding cyclists also. You know the ones...they have a red flshing light on the front to confuse the cars into thinking they are going in the opposite direction.

Never understood that one mesself--it can't help them see and only confuses oncoming traffic (yes, including me). And for some reason it seems to be really popular this season...

Oh yeah, and another vote for "leaving it to Darwin" here (as long as the buggers don't take you down with 'em!)

In aus.bicycle on Tue, 8 May 2007 17:54:22 +1000

treadly&amp me said:

Paul Yates said:

On my commute home along the Yarra I quite often encounter skilled
backwards riding cyclists also. You know the ones...they have a red
flshing light on the front to confuse the cars into thinking they are
going in the opposite direction.

Never understood that one mesself--it can't help them see and only
confuses oncoming traffic (yes, including me). And for some reason it
seems to be really popular this season...

Yes, I'm seeing a few of those too.

I guess it is because they are cheap and easy to get. So are white
front lights, so maybe the $2 difference is so much they won't buy
one?

Zebee

treadly&me said:

Paul Yates said:

On my commute home along the Yarra I quite often encounter skilled
backwards riding cyclists also. You know the ones...they have a red
flshing light on the front to confuse the cars into thinking they are
going in the opposite direction.

Never understood that one mesself--it can't help them see and only
confuses oncoming traffic (yes, including me). And for some reason it
seems to be really popular this season...

Oh yeah, and another vote for "leaving it to Darwin" here (as long as
the buggers don't take you down with 'em!)

On the paths, I reckon they are worse than no lights. Disinformation
screws with your judgement. You naturally assume you have more time
and that they are on the left. Good for creating headons.
Darwin doesn't care about collateral damage.

In aus.bicycle on Tue, 08 May 2007 22:33:27 +1000

Aeek said:

On the paths, I reckon they are worse than no lights. Disinformation
screws with your judgement. You naturally assume you have more time
and that they are on the left. Good for creating headons.
Darwin doesn't care about collateral damage.

At the moment the only path I use to get to work that has cyclists on
it at night is the Harbour Bridge path. I see a few of these but
because it's straight and tightly constrained each side (meaning
bounded by walls) and because I have good front light I don't have a
problem seeing them. THey are lit before I need to worry about their
light.

Going to be interesting when we move to Macquarie Park as about 3/4 of
the commute will be on bike paths[1]. No idea how many commuters use the
Cooks River path on weekdays, but it's much worse lit and much more
winding, a confusing red light might be more difficult to deal with
and the bloody unlit in any way ones more so!

Zebee

[1] mainly because the Cook's River and Shrimpton Creek paths take me
in a fairly straight and flat line to where I want to go.