General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

A year's photos.

Started by Gordon Burns · · Last activity · 7 posts · 402 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 December 2005
Last activity
6 December 2005
Original author
Gordon Burns
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
402
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've just signed up to fotopic, and have put all this year's piccies on
    there. Could some of the more photo savvy of you take a peek and let me know
    how it looks? Many thanks.

    http://mickledore.fotopic.net/

  2. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    I've just signed up to fotopic, and have put all this year's piccies on
    there. Could some of the more photo savvy of you take a peek and let me know
    how it looks? Many thanks.

    http://mickledore.fotopic.net/


    I'm fotopic savvy rather than photo savvy - it looks great to me.
    Pardon me, I could be some time :-)

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  3. Yes, I looked at yours closely before going with them.

    "Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    I've just signed up to fotopic, and have put all this year's piccies on
    there. Could some of the more photo savvy of you take a peek and let me
    know
    how it looks? Many thanks.

    http://mickledore.fotopic.net/


    I'm fotopic savvy rather than photo savvy - it looks great to me.
    Pardon me, I could be some time :-)

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  4. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I looked at yours closely before going with them.


    What I particularly like is that for someone like me who's not terribly
    technically minded their service is so easy to use. I use the Java
    upload facility and usually upload a folder at a time rather than
    individual photos. In fact, it's often easier to upload a complete
    folder and then delete the unwanted ones later. I've used their
    printing service as well, and that's excellent.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  5. I've struggled with Java. I've only got a very early version and this won't
    automatically update (Shades of the Anquet MM position). When I do a manual
    I get lost with the instructions - my eyes glaze over when those three
    letter file extensions litter the screen. I uploaded all the photos one by
    one, having a rest day on Sunday! Fortunately one of my customers has just
    redesigned battlefield communications for our main tank force, and says that
    Java is "simple". He owes me a favour, so I'll let him bumble about with it.

    "Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I looked at yours closely before going with them.


    What I particularly like is that for someone like me who's not terribly
    technically minded their service is so easy to use. I use the Java
    upload facility and usually upload a folder at a time rather than
    individual photos. In fact, it's often easier to upload a complete
    folder and then delete the unwanted ones later. I've used their
    printing service as well, and that's excellent.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  6. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    I've struggled with Java. I've only got a very early version and this won't
    automatically update (Shades of the Anquet MM position). When I do a manual
    I get lost with the instructions - my eyes glaze over when those three
    letter file extensions litter the screen. I uploaded all the photos one by
    one, having a rest day on Sunday!


    But - all I've had to do was to click on the 'use Java' link, navigate
    to a folder on my HDD, and then tell it to start uploading. Sometimes
    it can take a time, if there's a lot of stuff to upload, so I go and do
    something else for a few minutes and then come back to click the
    'publish' button. I've found it the easiest method of the lot since
    there's no limit on the number of files that can be uploaded in one go,
    and the Java wotnot seems to do everything for me. I know not of these
    three letter file extensions, unless you mean .jpg; that's the only one
    I ever see.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  7. I looked at Jalbum.net before deciding on fotopic. In there is a means of
    checking which version of Java is on my PC. When I ran this I was told I had
    version 1.0, and despite my machine only being some 2 years old, I was told
    that the latest version is already 5.0. I was offered the chance to upgrade,
    which I did THREE times (Thank god for restart points), but the upgrade
    simply wouldn't take.
    I then signed up with fotopic, and yes, there is a Java option. When I click
    on this simply got a smallish blank screen. I presumed the Java
    instructions were on here, but it wouldn't enlarge to let me see anything.
    So, I went back to Jalbum, where there was a facility for manual ugrade of
    Java. I started this, and then started getting all sorts of warnings about
    what downloads would do to various files, all with different three letter
    extensions. At this stage I ran away - when I drive a car I don't want to
    look under the bonnet, and similarly I don't want to be a computer mechanic.
    I use the not Java method, and upload a max 10 photos at a time. With over
    300 now downloaded this took some time!
    As I mentioned I have a tame mechanic who will sort it out eventually. Why
    is upgrading a computer programme always so difficult? Took me two hours
    today to update my anti virus because it would only do what was programmed
    into it, and wouldn't let me move on. As I said it's the MM/Anquet position.
    Software writers seem to want you to buy the whole new package every year
    paying far more than you need, rather than simply updating what you already
    have, and which, in most cases, is working perfectly adequately. I'm
    surprised G. Brown doesn't use a similar method for his tax regime, it's a
    foolproof way of taking money off the punters.
    Rant over!

    "Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    I've struggled with Java. I've only got a very early version and this
    won't
    automatically update (Shades of the Anquet MM position). When I do a
    manual
    I get lost with the instructions - my eyes glaze over when those three
    letter file extensions litter the screen. I uploaded all the photos one
    by
    one, having a rest day on Sunday!


    But - all I've had to do was to click on the 'use Java' link, navigate
    to a folder on my HDD, and then tell it to start uploading. Sometimes
    it can take a time, if there's a lot of stuff to upload, so I go and do
    something else for a few minutes and then come back to click the
    'publish' button. I've found it the easiest method of the lot since
    there's no limit on the number of files that can be uploaded in one go,
    and the Java wotnot seems to do everything for me. I know not of these
    three letter file extensions, unless you mean .jpg; that's the only one
    I ever see.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.