A Tale of Two Septembers
By David Morris, AlterNet September 9, 2003
September 11th marks the second anniversary of the aerial attack by terrorists that killed 2,700
people and profoundly changed American society.
September 11th also marks the anniversary, in this case the thirtieth, of the aerial attack by
terrorists that led to the murder of more than 3,000 people and profoundly changed Chilean society.
American commentators probably won't mention the 1973 attacks on Chile and their aftermath. They
should, because in those attacks it was the U.S. government that played the role of Al Qaeda -
recruiting, training, arming, financing and coordinating the terrorists.
Our involvement in this unsavory affair is now widely recognized. As Secretary of State Colin Powell
himself recently acknowledged, "It is not a part of our country's history that we are proud of."
Powell's comment implies a feeling of contrition that I doubt his colleagues in this Administration
share. For the ties are remarkably intimate between those who planned the attacks on Chile's White
House and those in charge of responding to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Vice President [censored] Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld worked in the Nixon cabinet. And
in a most telling demonstration of continuity, President Bush appointed Henry Kissinger, the central
player in the overthrow of the Chilean government, to chair the Committee investigating the attacks
on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. (Kissinger withdrew in the face of ferocious worldwide
criticism.) On September 4, 1970 Salvador Allende, founder of the Socialist Party and four time
presidential candidate, was elected President of Chile. That Allende was duly and uncontrovertibly
elected in a country with a long and rich democratic tradition, a country whose voting turnout is
double that of the United States, was irrelevant to President Nixon and his Secretary of State Henry
Kissinger. "I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go Communist due to the
irresponsibility of its own people," Kissinger declared.
"Nixon was beside himself," Kissinger later wrote. CIA Director Richard Helms remembers Nixon
"wanted something done and he didn't much care how." Initially the U.S. tried to forestall Allende's
taking office by financing the kidnapping of the head of the Armed Forces, General Rene Schneider.
Schneider resisted and was shot on October 22, 1970 and died three days later. The CIA reportedly
paid $35,000 to the assassins. Having failed with Plan A, Nixon and Kissinger moved to Plan B. This
was, according to Nixon's CIA Director Richard Helms to "make the (Chilean) economy scream". Plan B
was successful economically. By cutting off public and private aid, encouraging U.S. corporations to
stop sending replacement parts to Chilean factories and fomenting strikes and sabotage in Chile, the
U.S. undermined its economy.
But Plan B failed politically. Even in the face of growing economic instability Chile maintained its
democratic traditions. And the percentage voting for Allende's Popular Unity coalition continued to
increase, from 36 percent in September 1970 to 44 percent in April 1972.
In June 1973 parts of the Chilean Navy attempted a coup and failed. A million people marched to the
President's office and demanded arms to be able to defend the government. President Allende stood on
the balcony and firmly rejected their request. To the end he was a Constitutionalist. As were
several of the leaders of the Chilean military. These were arrested in the early morning of
September 11th. About 8:30AM rogue military units began bombing the Chilean White House. Allende
died in his office. General Augusto Pinochet, an admirer of Adolf [censored], seized power.
Pinochet's military dictatorship killed thousands, tortured tens of thousands and drove more than a
million Chileans into exile. A society with a 150 year tradition of democracy and participation
suffered under totalitarian rule. No elections were held at any level for 15 years. Women were
arrested for organizing soccer clubs. As Tina Rosenberg observed in the New York Times, "Meetings of
any kind were considered subversive - in the first year after the coup, even Miss Chile was
appointed." The United States rewarded Chile by dramatically increasing both grants and loans. On
June 8, 1976, at the height of Pinochet's repression, Kissinger met in private with the dictator and
told him, "We are sympathetic to what you are trying to do here".
Having thwarted the possibility that Chile would become a model of democratic socialism, the United
States made Chile a model of dictatorial capitalism. Under the hands-on guidance of University of
Chicago economists, the Chilean economy was restructured. Unions were outlawed. Real wages plunged.
Social spending was slashed. Of 507 public enterprises in l973 only l5 remained in government hands
by l980. Chile privatized its social security system. The experiment failed. Unemployment soared.
Malnutrition soared. In l973 Chile had the second highest income in Latin America, next to oil rich
Venezuela. By 1988, when the military relinquished the reigns of government, Chile's income had
fallen behind that of many countries, including Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay.
As a result of widespread protests, none of which were financed by the United States, Pinochet
agreed to step down. In 1989 a new government took office and to some extent has undone the damage
wrought by the Pinochet years. Today Chilean society remains scarred by the events of 9/11/73. The
military pushed through a Constitutional provision that allowed it sufficient representation in
Congress to block reforms. In l99l General Pinochet declared that if Chile were to try to undertake
the kinds of economic initiatives embraced by Allende, "In such circumstances it will be impossible
to prevent" the military from intervening once again. Although elections now take place in Chile and
political activity has revived, its dimension and vitality, once so rich, is circumscribed. The
United States also felt the effects of 9/11/73. Policymakers were shocked at the revelations of our
involvement. And at the same time they learned of Nixon's increasing willingness to wield the powers
of government against perceived domestic as well as foreign enemies.
Nixon resigned in August 1974. Congressional investigations of our the use of government here and
abroad by the Nixon administration led it to reinforce and strengthen the prohibition on domestic
surveillance by the
CIA. It banned the use of assassination as a tool of foreign policy. CIA director Richard Helms was
indicted and convicted of lying to Congress about US involvement in Chile. Today the
connections between the two September lls remain. While we are pursuing Saddam Hussein in order
to try him for war crimes, prosecutors in four countries are pursuing Henry Kissinger to get
him to testify about his role in the Chilean coup.
In the aftermath of 9/11/01 the Bush White House has reinstated many of the practices of the Nixon
White House and has adopted a similar approach regarding those who oppose its policies. Nixon had an
enemies list. Vice President Cheney declares, "You're either for us or against us." The policy of
covert interventions in foreign countries has been revived. The CIA now is intimately involved in
domestic surveillance. The White House has formally re-established the practice of political
assassination.
This September 11th we should remember two anniversaries and reflect on the links between the two.