QUESTION: Does Rule 302 (or any other rule) prohibit
California licensed DCs from informing pregnant women that
OBs are closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely
manipulating most babies' spines?
PREGNANT WOMEN: For simple PROOF that OBs are closing birth
canals - and simple instructions on how easy it is for women
to allow their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
see the URL below.
OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS via
[email hidden]
RONALD G. HAYES, D.C. - Chair Term Expires: February 10,
2006
R. MICHAEL HAMBY, D.C. - Vice Chair Term Expires: February
10, 2004^^^
BARBARA A. STANFIELD, D.C. - Secretary Term Expires:
February 10, 2007
JOHN A. MARDER, Public Member Term Expires: November 3, 2004
STAN R. LEWIS, Public Member Term Expires: November 3, 2004
DAVID F. YOSHIDA, D.C. Term Expires: February 10, 2006^^^
SHEILA WELLS, D.C. Term Expires: February 10, 2004^^^
^^^There is a one-year grace period following the expiration
of a Board member's term. chiro.ca.govboardOpen ↗
Dear Board Members,
I am unlicensed by choice working full-time-plus on
stopping OBs from closing birth canals up to 30%. OBs are
gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating most babies'
spines at birth.
ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal
closed up to 30%.
I became unlicensed by choice after being told by a man
calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the Calif.
Chiro Board, that my license to practice chiropractic did
not allow me to inform pregnant women that OBs are closing
birth canals up to 30%.
I was sued for one million dollars by a man calling himself
Michael Schroeder, attorney for the Calif. Chiro Board - the
man who just happened to have authored the Calif. Chiro
Board regulation (Rule 302) that ostensibly makes it illegal
for California DCs to inform pregnant women that OBs are
closing birth canals up to 30%.
I spent $2000+ dollars trying to get the trial moved to
Oregon where I could afford to defend myself - but lost on
jurisdiction - after which this latter Michael Schroeder (I
do NOT know if he is the same as the former) was awarded a
$25,000 dollar default judgement - the merits of the case
never having been argued.
This latter Michael Schroeder (again, I do not know if he is
the same as the former) coincidentally was paid by the
Calif. Chiro Board to "defend" his Rule 302 - against **10
MD-obstetricians** (et al.) who - in my view - were suing to
get Schroeder's Rule 302 - not overturned but **judicially
rubberstamped**.
I think the 10 MD-obstetricians INTENDED to lose - to get
case law on the record to *support* Schroeder's Rule 302
which ostensibly (I assumed after the call from the first
Schroeder) prohibited California DCs from informing pregnant
women that OBs are closing birth canals and gruesomely
manipulating most babies' spines.
DOES Rule 302 (or any other rule) prohibit Calif. licensed
DCs from informing pregnant women that OBs are closing birth
canals and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines?
If not, I urge each of you to do what you can to save tiny
lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative vertebral
subluxations than vaunted licensed DCs will ever be able to
adjust by hand.
Thank you for your earliest consideration of this matter.
Tiny lives and tiny limbs are at stake.
Sincerely,
Todd
Ra. Gastaldo [email hidden]
PS For PROOF that OBs are knowingly closing birth canals...
See: I ain't no Semmelweis, but... health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2591
This Open Letter will be archived for global access within
24 hours in the Google usenet groups archive. Search
groups.google.comgroups.google.comOpen ↗ for "A simple question for the
Calif. Chiro Board"