"Anthony Sloan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Carla A-G said:Rear derailleurs will be a thing of the past. Once internally geared
hubs
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:are improved and lightened in weight, they will be available on all
geared
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:bikes.
- CA-G shooting herself in the foot...
Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!
I like the easy confidence with which people cast off this notion.
I've spent considerable time trying to invent a replacement for the derailleur. What I really wanted
to invent was a CVT for bicycles. The trouble is, how do you beat the reliability and superior
efficiency of the derailleur? Would automatic shifting or a CVT actually improve cycling in any
substantial way?
Invention most often attempts to replace or improve existing problematic technologies. Paradigm
shifts occur when there is a need for a paradigm shift - such as going from not being able to fly,
to flying. The fact that current derailleur-based drivetrains are up to 99% energy efficient, cheap
to manufacture and super reliable tends to lessen the likelihood of a paradigm shift. To what would
we be shifting? The new technology would have to be substantially better than what currently exists.
It also has to obey the laws of physics.
Quoted message said:The problem with paradigm shifts is that you never can see them coming.
Paradigm-shifting technologies evolve steadily. They don't just pop into existence overnight.
Automobiles, jet airliners, computer networking, microwave ovens, personal computers, wireless
telephony, GMO's - all of these technologies evolved over decades before they shifted any paradigms.
Bicycles have evolved, too. The arrival of reliable derailleurs was the paradigm shift.
Barry