Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

A Parting Word

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 48 posts · 1,670 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
9 February 2005
Last activity
11 February 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
48
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,670
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 48
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Readership,

    Ed Gin relishes exhausting his opposition ... discouraging his
    adversary from making further posts. When someone becomes glutted from
    Ed Gin's [censored] and concludes that enough is enough, adds Ed to a
    kill file and refrains from responding, Ed regards this as an act of
    surrender ... an adversary vanquished ... a victory to be celebrated.
    The only reason that I've not yet terminated this squabble is because
    I'd rather not give Ed even that small shred of satisfaction. On the
    other hand, it is the readership that pays the price. They are the
    victims here. I feel that it would be selfish of me to pursue this any
    longer and subject the readership to any further suffering. One thing
    that I learned from past skirmishes with Ed is that responding to him
    only serves to encourage him. He feeds off of responses much like a
    parasite feeds off of a host organism. Someone has to be the bigger
    person if this is to end. It may as well be me. Unfortunately, the
    readership will not entirely be spared, as Ed will undoubtedly select
    another victim. This is the nature of a parasite, in this case an
    ungoverned, unscrupulous, slimy, bottom feeding troll ... an oozing
    festering, canker on the hide of Internet forums.

    I suspect that there are those that consider Ed Gin, Ed Dolan and
    myself to be whackos. I suspect that there are those who respect me
    for taking Ed Gin on. I suspect that there are also those who will
    respect me for calling it quits. Unlike Ed, I've better things to do
    with my time, so he's all yours folks. I'm out of here. Gee, Ed ... I
    miss you already ... N O T !!!

    Jim McNamara

  2. [email hidden said:

    "]Readership,

    Ed Gin relishes exhausting his opposition ... discouraging his
    adversary from making further posts. When someone becomes glutted from
    Ed Gin's [censored] and concludes that enough is enough, adds Ed to a
    kill file and refrains from responding, Ed regards this as an act of
    surrender ... an adversary vanquished ... a victory to be celebrated.
    The only reason that I've not yet terminated this squabble is because
    I'd rather not give Ed even that small shred of satisfaction. On the
    other hand, it is the readership that pays the price. They are the
    victims here. I feel that it would be selfish of me to pursue this any
    longer and subject the readership to any further suffering. One thing
    that I learned from past skirmishes with Ed is that responding to him
    only serves to encourage him. He feeds off of responses much like a
    parasite feeds off of a host organism. Someone has to be the bigger
    person if this is to end. It may as well be me. Unfortunately, the
    readership will not entirely be spared, as Ed will undoubtedly select
    another victim. This is the nature of a parasite, in this case an
    ungoverned, unscrupulous, slimy, bottom feeding troll ... an oozing
    festering, canker on the hide of Internet forums.

    I suspect that there are those that consider Ed Gin, Ed Dolan and
    myself to be whackos. I suspect that there are those who respect me
    for taking Ed Gin on. I suspect that there are also those who will
    respect me for calling it quits. Unlike Ed, I've better things to do
    with my time, so he's all yours folks. I'm out of here. Gee, Ed ... I
    miss you already ... N O T !!!

    Jim McNamara


    You're not gone yet?

  3. nget,

    Nope. Tell you what. You leave and I'll follow you. Ladies first.
    How's that?

    Jim McNamara

  4. [email hidden said:

    "]nget,

    Nope. Tell you what. You leave and I'll follow you. Ladies first.
    How's that?

    Jim McNamara


    You are like a cat that [censored] on a hardwood floor,scratch all you want that pile just won't go away.

  5. nget,

    It just dawned on me ... No Gots Epic Testicles. So that's what nget
    stands for. Speaking af animals and [censored]. Anyone who finds it
    necessary to anonymously snipe from behind a Usenet email server that
    obscures one's identity is a CHICKEN [censored]!

    Jim McNamara

  6. [email hidden said:

    "]nget,

    It just dawned on me ... No Gots Epic Testicles. So that's what nget
    stands for. Speaking af animals and [censored]. Anyone who finds it
    necessary to anonymously snipe from behind a Usenet email server that
    obscures one's identity is a CHICKEN [censored]!

    Jim McNamara


    Didn't it ever dawn on you just to leave? Now take a hike pal.

  7. nget,

    I respectfully refer you to my latet post to you in "Jimmy Mac and
    others time to quit".

    Jim McNamara

  8. [email hidden said:

    "]nget,

    I respectfully refer you to my latet post to you in "Jimmy Mac and
    others time to quit".

    Jim McNamara


    I respectfully refer you to the door that says"EXIT"

  9. nget,

    Did you read the reasonable response I referred you to before being so
    curt and unreasonable? I again respectfully refer you to what I wrote.
    Just what is it that you have a problem with?

    Jim McNamara

    nget said:
    Quoted message said:

    nget,

    I respectfully refer you to my latet post to you in "Jimmy Mac and
    others time to quit".

    Jim McNamara


    I respectfully refer you to the door that says"EXIT"

    --
    nget

  10. Subject: Re: A Parting Word
    Newsgroup: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    = = said:

    Anyone who finds it
    necessary to anonymously snipe from behind a Usenet email server that
    obscures one's identity is a CHICKEN [censored]!

    You're not very good at reading headers, are you?

    --

    -Graham

    Remove the snails to email

  11. G. Morgan said:

    Subject: Re: A Parting Word
    Newsgroup: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    = = said:

    Anyone who finds it
    necessary to anonymously snipe from behind a Usenet email server that
    obscures one's identity is a CHICKEN [censored]!

    You're not very good at reading headers, are you?

    --

    -Graham

    Remove the snails to email


    Graham what ya doing thar partner fixen to make trouble are ya?

  12. Graham,

    What I said about anonymous sniping applies to several folks out here.
    With 30+ years of IT expereince (about half of that in a PC technical
    support capacity), email headers do don't present all that much of a
    challenge.

    Jim McNamara

  13. Subject: Re: A Parting Word
    Newsgroup: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    = nget = said:

    Graham what ya doing thar partner fixen to make trouble are ya?

    Naaa, I won't spill the beans. I'll let Colombo figure it out.

    --

    -Graham

    Remove the snails to email

  14. Subject: Re: A Parting Word
    Newsgroup: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    = = said:


    What I said about anonymous sniping applies to several folks out here.
    With 30+ years of IT expereince (about half of that in a PC technical
    support capacity), email headers do don't present all that much of a
    challenge.

    What email headers?

    --

    -Graham

    Remove the snails to email

  15. "G. Morgan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A Parting Word
    Newsgroup: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    = = said:


    What I said about anonymous sniping applies to several folks out here.
    With 30+ years of IT expereince (about half of that in a PC technical
    support capacity), email headers do don't present all that much of a
    challenge.

    What email headers?

    Graham, examine the header of any of the posts by Ed Gin under his many sock
    puppets. Jim has explained all of this in a previous post and it is an eye
    opener. Jim knows what he is talking about on this subject. In addition, De
    Souza has positively identified this scoundrel Ed Gin by closely examining
    the origins of Ed Gin's posts. Only Mr. Sherman refuses to accept the
    evidence.

    There is nothing wrong with a user name which is as common as mud, but that
    is not what Ed Gin does. He forges, falsifies, and steals identities. This
    is not a small thing to be doing. It borders on criminality and insanity and
    is against every Usenet rule and regulation. Jon Meinecke will confirm this.
    What Ed Gin does to me and Jim he could just as easily do to you or anyone
    else. He could even do it to Tom Sherman, which is why Tom has taken to the
    tall grass.

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota

  16. Subject: Re: A Parting Word
    Newsgroup: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    = Edward Dolan = said:

    Graham, examine the header of any of the posts by Ed Gin under his many sock
    puppets.

    <snip>

    I'm well aware of how to read USENET headers. I'm asking Columbo (Jim) what
    EMAIL headers.

    He accuses Nget of posting anonymously, but how is his style any better? Would
    Columbo be satisfied if Nget were to post a email address from a free service
    like Yahoo or Gmail too? I can tell exactly what city and state Nget is
    posting from and his ISP, hardly anonymous or trying to cover up his tracks as
    Jim claims.

    I have my newsreader set to display full headers above each message. When
    dealing with a scumbag like Robert L. Bass in another newsgroup, one has to be
    sharp.

    Here Nget, (and anyone else) have a Gmail account so no one can accuse you of
    hiding.

    http://s92464059.onlinehome.us/gmail/

    --

    -Graham

    Remove the snails to email

  17. "G. Morgan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A Parting Word
    Newsgroup: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    = Edward Dolan = said:

    Graham, examine the header of any of the posts by Ed Gin under his many
    sock
    puppets.

    <snip>

    I'm well aware of how to read USENET headers. I'm asking Columbo (Jim)
    what
    EMAIL headers.

    He accuses Nget of posting anonymously, but how is his style any better?
    Would
    Columbo be satisfied if Nget were to post a email address from a free
    service
    like Yahoo or Gmail too? I can tell exactly what city and state Nget is
    posting from and his ISP, hardly anonymous or trying to cover up his
    tracks as
    Jim claims.

    If you can tell what ISP someone is posting from, then surely that is all
    you have to know. One will have to have an account with the ISP and a
    computer address.

    Quoted message said:

    I have my newsreader set to display full headers above each message.

    How do you do that Graham? I have the OE newsreader.

    When

    Quoted message said:

    dealing with a scumbag like Robert L. Bass in another newsgroup, one has
    to be
    sharp.

    Graham, I do not know this Robert L. Bass like you do, but surely there has
    never been a scumbag in the history of Usenet like Ed Gin. He steals
    identities. I mean, how low can you get?

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota

  18. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Readership,

    Ed Gin relishes exhausting his opposition ... discouraging his
    adversary from making further posts. When someone becomes glutted from
    Ed Gin's [censored] and concludes that enough is enough, adds Ed to a
    kill file and refrains from responding, Ed regards this as an act of
    surrender ... an adversary vanquished ... a victory to be celebrated.
    The only reason that I've not yet terminated this squabble is because
    I'd rather not give Ed even that small shred of satisfaction. On the
    other hand, it is the readership that pays the price. They are the
    victims here. I feel that it would be selfish of me to pursue this any
    longer and subject the readership to any further suffering. One thing
    that I learned from past skirmishes with Ed is that responding to him
    only serves to encourage him. He feeds off of responses much like a
    parasite feeds off of a host organism. Someone has to be the bigger
    person if this is to end. It may as well be me. Unfortunately, the
    readership will not entirely be spared, as Ed will undoubtedly select
    another victim. This is the nature of a parasite, in this case an
    ungoverned, unscrupulous, slimy, bottom feeding troll ... an oozing
    festering, canker on the hide of Internet forums.

    I suspect that there are those that consider Ed Gin, Ed Dolan and
    myself to be whackos. I suspect that there are those who respect me
    for taking Ed Gin on. I suspect that there are also those who will
    respect me for calling it quits. Unlike Ed, I've better things to do
    with my time, so he's all yours folks. I'm out of here. Gee, Ed ... I
    miss you already ... N O T !!!

    Jim McNamara

    Screw it Jim! Let us take down the newsgroup since no one else here gives a
    damn. Hey, if Mr. Sherman who has been posting here for 5 years does not
    care, why should any of the rest of us. Screw ARBR all the way to hell and
    back. Unless and until I see some others here besides you and me intent on
    defending this group, then let it die and good riddance. ARBR does not
    deserve to exist if it is so gutless that it will not defend itself against
    a criminal troll like Ed Gin.

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota

  19. G. Morgan said:

    Subject: Re: A Parting Word
    Newsgroup: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent

    = Edward Dolan = said:

    Graham, examine the header of any of the posts by Ed Gin under his many sock
    puppets.

    <snip>

    I'm well aware of how to read USENET headers. I'm asking Columbo (Jim) what
    EMAIL headers.

    He accuses Nget of posting anonymously, but how is his style any better? Would
    Columbo be satisfied if Nget were to post a email address from a free service
    like Yahoo or Gmail too? I can tell exactly what city and state Nget is
    posting from and his ISP, hardly anonymous or trying to cover up his tracks as
    Jim claims.

    I have my newsreader set to display full headers above each message. When
    dealing with a scumbag like Robert L. Bass in another newsgroup, one has to be
    sharp.

    Here Nget, (and anyone else) have a Gmail account so no one can accuse you of
    hiding.

    http://s92464059.onlinehome.us/gmail/

    --

    -Graham

    Remove the snails to email


    Now that you know where I live why not stop by for a beer sometime?When you get in the area just ask anyone where the guy lives who rides the funny bikes. You can test ride my trike.Btw did anybody notice the front door to this place is wide open.Anyone can just come right in the house and [censored] on the floor if they want to.But its all about freedom of speech right?

  20. "nget" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    [...]
    Btw did anybody notice the

    Quoted message said:

    front door to this place is wide open.Anyone can just come right in the
    house and [censored] on the floor if they want to.But its all about freedom of
    speech right?

    --
    nget

    Right you are Nget. That is what Ed Gin does every time he posts to this
    group, but with him it has nothing to do with freedom of speech. It has to
    do with abuse of free speech. He is nothing but a criminal and he [censored] on
    this group every time he posts. Care to find me a single post of his which
    is otherwise?

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.