General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

A nike fool?

Started by + · · Last activity · 8 posts · 819 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 June 2004
Last activity
5 July 2004
Original author
+
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
819
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Donovan Rebbechi <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    2 or 3 a year ? How many miles do you get per pair ? The
    best I've gotten 600 out of a pair of Saucony Trigons, but
    I wasn't game to push my luck further after the tread had
    worn through (though they still felt OK)

    Cheers,

    Donovan, The idiot is wearing NIKES, so of course he goes
    through 2,3, or 4 pairs a year. He continually rants how
    great they are, but has to buy 2 or 3 pairs a year?
    LOLOL. Gee, I'm on year 3 of my older Asics, and they are
    still great off road, and my newest ones are over a year
    now at 9 miles a day, with NO SIGNS OF WEAR on them. And
    to think I pay a
    1/3 to 1/2 less too? Not just that, but notice how he skirts
    the mileage question? I'm betting if he did more than 3
    miles his ankles would break. The more he posts, the more
    we know he's just a troll, or just a fool.

  2. In the late 70's ,early 80's...all nike,reebok were made
    tough..I remember the reebok wallywaffle and how nike
    started 2 make their own trainers tougher than that reebok
    protocol'waffle' design. You couldn't beat a Reebok GL1600
    or an Adidas 500 (better than the
    600)....they started making them for fashion first, and
    secondary came comfort for the endurance and long
    distance runner...Adidas web was comfy.. All the
    designer dudes tho' went for a completely non athletic
    trainer called the adidas 'gazelle', and it was this
    that made adidas concern their focus on 'running' as a
    different option...

  3. What's wrong w/buying two pairs of shoes per year?

    [email hidden] (+) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Donovan Rebbechi <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    2 or 3 a year ? How many miles do you get per pair ? The
    best I've gotten 600 out of a pair of Saucony Trigons,
    but I wasn't game to push my luck further after the
    tread had worn through (though they still felt OK)

    Cheers,

    Donovan, The idiot is wearing NIKES, so of course he goes
    through 2,3, or 4 pairs a year. He continually rants how
    great they are, but has to buy 2 or 3 pairs a year?
    LOLOL. Gee, I'm on year 3 of my older Asics, and they are
    still great off road, and my newest ones are over a year
    now at 9 miles a day, with NO SIGNS OF WEAR on them. And
    to think I pay a
    1/3 to 1/2 less too? Not just that, but notice how he
    skirts the mileage question? I'm betting if he did more
    than 3 miles his ankles would break. The more he posts,
    the more we know he's just a troll, or just a fool.

  4. History means little in this discussion. The real problem
    with nikes is they are made all over at various sweat shops,
    and the consistency is just not there.

    "K.Soza" <GY@haddockandchips> wrote in message news:<40db97da$1_2@mk-nntp-
    2.news.uk.tiscali.com>...

    Quoted message said:

    In the late 70's ,early 80's...all nike,reebok were made
    tough..I remember the reebok wallywaffle and how nike
    started 2 make their own trainers tougher than that reebok
    protocol'waffle' design. You couldn't beat a Reebok GL1600
    or an Adidas 500 (better than the
    600)....they started making them for fashion first, and
    secondary came comfort for the endurance and long
    distance runner...Adidas web was comfy.. All the
    designer dudes tho' went for a completely non athletic
    trainer called the adidas 'gazelle', and it was this
    that made adidas concern their focus on 'running' as a
    different option...

  5. [email hidden] (John B.) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    What's wrong w/buying two pairs of shoes per year?

    Nothing, but why do it if you don't have to?

  6. + said:

    History means little in this discussion. The real problem
    with nikes is they are made all over at various sweat
    shops, and the consistency is just not there.

    I have a pair of Asics Nimbus, Asics Cumulus, Asics Tiger
    Paw, Asics DS Racers, and Asics Verdict shoes.

    Pop quiz -- which of these are made in the USA ? Which are
    made in China ?

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi pegasus.rutgers.edu~elflord

  7. Donovan Rebbechi <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a pair of Asics Nimbus, Asics Cumulus, Asics
    Tiger Paw, Asics DS


    Racers, and Asics Verdict shoes.

    Pop quiz -- which of these are made in the USA ? Which are
    made in China ?

    None/All.

  8. both ways ,,, only with cumulus and nimbus ,,, that was
    funny!!=)) plodzilla

    Fluke Worm said:


    gentolm <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    i like both the cumulus and nimbus

    Oh, so you go both ways then?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.