Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

A nice story from Jim Lockwood

Started by Tom Nakashima · · Last activity · 11 posts · 845 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
3 December 2007
Last activity
5 December 2007
Original author
Tom Nakashima
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
845
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.thespincycle.com/trips.asp?level1=greatest_cyclist
    -tom

  2. http://www.villagesoup.com//Community/story.cfm?storyid=104118

  3. http://www.fatcyclist.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/WindowsLiveWriter/Exclusive2007TourDeFranceWinnerStrippedo_91B0/prudhomme%5B7%5D.jpg

  4. Tom Nakashima said:

    http://www.thespincycle.com/trips.asp?level1=greatest_cyclist
    -tom

    Dear Tom,

    Here's the link that James Thomson recently posted to the details of
    Merckx's hour bike:

    http://www.classicrendezvous.com/Benelux/Merckx/Merckx_hour_B-guide_1.htm

    Mexico City is at about 7,350 feet, so yes a rider will go noticeably
    faster. The defaults for this calculator predict 22.77 mph at sea
    level:

    http://austinimage.com/bp/velocity/velocity.html

    Raise the elevation to 7,350 feet and the speed prediction rises to
    25.19 mph, about 10% faster.

    Someone who pedals daily around the Arkansas River at about 4,900 feet
    enjoys a predicted 24.36 mph and a 1.6 mph advantage.

    Of course, thinner air might reduce the rider's aerobic function and
    power.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  5. Carl,

    not to leave the topic but where is the Arkansas at 4,900' ? Decimal
    Degrees?
    During you cyber travels, have you stumbled over a comprehensive
    American rivers map or program?

    g. daniels

  6. SIMLA !

    say do know know which crick runs green?

  7. On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:47:32 -0800 (PST), datakoll <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Carl,

    not to leave the topic but where is the Arkansas at 4,900' ? Decimal
    Degrees?
    During your cyber travels, have you stumbled over a comprehensive
    American rivers map or program?

    g. daniels

    Dear Gene,

    The Arkansas River is at 4,900 about half-way down the face of the dam
    at the Pueblo Reservoir:

    http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ahps2/river.php?wfo=pub&wfoid=18741&riverid=203212&view=1%2C1%2C1%2C1%2C1%2C1%2C1%2C1&toggles=10%2C7%2C8%2C2%2C9%2C15%2C6&pt%5B%5D=143297&allpoints=141925%2C142231%2C143942%2C141692%2C141559%2C143795%2C143297%2C142821%2C144381%2C142082%2C143365%2C141929%2C143528%2C141939%2C144535%2C143645%2C143636%2C143634%2C143635%2C144746%2C144551%2C144562%2C143883%2C143207%2C141761%2C142665%2C144208%2C143940%2C144093%2C141681%2C144132%2C141419%2C144149%2C141804%2C143269%2C141272%2C143867%2C142942%2C141671%2C141179%2C142585%2C143409&data%5B%5D=all&submit=Make+my+River+Page%21

    My daily ride goes west up the river to the dam, up to the top of the
    south side of the dam, about 200 feet more up the ridge west of town,
    and then back down along the south river bank again and up onto the
    bluffs:

    http://i19.tinypic.com/4kynamo.jpg

    I'm sitting at the 4750 foot contour line on top of the south bluffs
    here, where the line goes rightward into the gray residential zone:

    http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?T=2&S=11&Z=13&X=1328&Y=10589&W=3

    My daily ride drops about 50 feet down to the river, shown as 4697 at
    the upper left, then climbs to about 5100 feet, so 4900 is about
    average.

    Water flow and reservoir height readings may matter more in arid
    south-east Colorado than in Florida:

    http://i4.tinypic.com/7yrl0fa.jpg

    The daily report this morning shows the Pueblo Reservoir at 4858.10
    feet, John Martin Reservoir downstream at 3805.13. The precision seems
    absurd until you realize how much water a hundredth of an inch rise
    means to dry-land farmers from here to the Mississipi when the
    reservoirs cover dozens of square miles. Colorado and Kansas lawyers
    spend their lives squabbling over water rights.

    As for detailed elevations of rivers, I don't know of any specific
    maps, but the high-resolution topo contour lines on the maps at
    http://terraserver.microsoft.com will get you reasonably good
    information.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  8. Interesting riding.
    Can you recommend all star downhills? for total ambience not sheer
    drop or max speed.

    I down l;oa76=((EXded google ert yesterday so river tracking was
    easier than Gmaps.
    the river track seems easy: algorithm wall depth wall, label with
    name( muddy, white green, kikapoo, brule, elk fox...), project. I
    don't know about cross section for altitude/drop: wether that's
    derived or developed. Next week.

    water here is the big deal. Tho sand perks, the lay is flat so once
    fallen water doesn't run it just sits there. That's what all the
    ditching was about. Collier, remember? Advertising: faster lower
    longer wider no cypress trees, no Everglades, no Florida Bay.

    My pet NOAA dam is the one a Sidney Lanier.

    I guess I'll drive thru and ask about the green crick

  9. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom Nakashima said:

    http://www.thespincycle.com/trips.asp?level1=greatest_cyclist
    -tom

    Dear Tom,

    Here's the link that James Thomson recently posted to the details of
    Merckx's hour bike:

    http://www.classicrendezvous.com/Benelux/Merckx/Merckx_hour_B-guide_1.htm

    Mexico City is at about 7,350 feet, so yes a rider will go noticeably
    faster. The defaults for this calculator predict 22.77 mph at sea
    level:

    http://austinimage.com/bp/velocity/velocity.html

    Raise the elevation to 7,350 feet and the speed prediction rises to
    25.19 mph, about 10% faster.

    Someone who pedals daily around the Arkansas River at about 4,900 feet
    enjoys a predicted 24.36 mph and a 1.6 mph advantage.

    Of course, thinner air might reduce the rider's aerobic function and
    power.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    There will always be "loop holes", Carl, in any type of record settings.
    I love Merckx because he did it without all the aero stuff.
    Also enjoyed Indurain breaking the hour record in 1994 with one of the
    poorest form I've ever seen. Just to think, if only he had great form.
    It's sort of have been a tradition for the winner of the Tour de France
    to consider the "Hour Record". Waiting for your man; "TT/Climber
    Specialist" Lance to do it.
    -tom

  10. Mexico, Italy, Denmark, Belgium, France...
    Indianapolis? too much advertising visibility?

  11. datakoll aka gene daniels said:


    SIMLA !

    say do know know which crick runs green?

    The Chicago River on St. Patrick's Day.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "Localized intense suction such as tornadoes is created when temperature
    differences are high enough between meeting air masses, and can impart
    excessive energy onto a cyclist." - Randy Schlitter

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.