------------------------------------------------------------------------
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/39306
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: An improvment over other scores
- yes, it rocks
- no, it sucks
- don't really care
- who is charles bukowski
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For those are patience impaired, you can get your Uniskills Coefficient
at http://munipsycho.com/uniskills.jsp. Now read on...
I watched the earlier thread on the New Kewl System with great interest.
I think SAAM's New Kewl System is definite improvement. However, in the
interest of pushing until I break something, I have revised his approach
slightly. My reasoning is as follows.
I can -usually- jump an 8 inch log on my KH24, but sometimes I fall. I
can -usually- take a pretty wicked downhill, but sometimes I fall. I can
almost always ride a 30' log end-to-end, but sometimes I fall. And in
fact I can do a bunch of stuff, but I can't do any of it perfectly and
.... sometimes I fall. (Less as time goes by, but sometimes I fall.)
I tend to evaluate my skills probabilistically when I'm riding. (Comes
from years of running intervals and having a background in statistics, I
guess.) I can jump the 8 inch log successfully 7 or 8 times out of ten.
I'm terrible on the 24" in drop. I can land and ride it maybe 1 time in
5, or maybe 3 in ten tries (if I'm lucky). I'm pretty good at riding up
rutted, rooted steep hills -- and getting better -- I'll give it 7 in
10. And so it goes.
I know some of you are perfect in that once you master a skill, you
never fall again. (Ahem! Right!) So, let's have a little humility, and
a lot of hope, and leave perfection as that state to which we aspire -
speaking for myself, at least. Speaking again for myself, if I did
everything perfectly, my interest in this sport would quickly
diminish.
My new Uniskills Coefficient is based on the premise that we assess
ourselves on each skill in terms of how many times out of ten we nail
it. (OK, that's still partly subjective, but whadaya gonna do?) Unlike
the "OFFICIAL LEVELS", you get plenty of tries. Unlike SAAM's scale, it
leaves most of us with plenty of room for improvement. At least it
leaves me with plenty of room for improvement. In fact, I have plenty
of room for improvement with or without this new measurement device.
I have written a simple algorithm that allows you to input a score from
0 to 10 for each skill. It multiplies your score by the level to
include SAAM's concept. Then through the magic of division, it shows
your Uniskills Coefficient, which ranges from 0 to 1000.
(I would be happy to provide the code to a proficient Java coder to
check. There could be an error in it, but it's really a pretty simple
algorithm.)
So, how good are we? Honestly now! To repeat: You can get your
Uniskills Coefficient at http://munipsycho.com/uniskills.jsp
Please note that the box running this page is hanging off my dsl line.
Sorry if it's a little slow.
And if you haven't read any Charles Bukowski lately, well, you probably
should.
So whadaya think?
--
munipsycho - CrashTestDummies are us.
=====================
I can fly too. But I can only fly down.
-Little Bear
Imagine all the people
Riding on one wheel.
J. Lennon. (paraphrased)
www.birdknob.net
www.munipsycho.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
munipsycho's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9589
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/39306