Road Cycling · Public discussion

A cras-prone Tour?

Started by Bob In Ct · · Last activity · 7 posts · 790 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 July 2004
Last activity
9 July 2004
Original author
Bob In Ct
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
790
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or
    previous) races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there
    really more crashes this year than last year (obviously,
    several of the crashes last year were bad, taking out some
    of the major contenders)?

    --
    Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply

  2. "Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or
    previous) races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there
    really more crashes this year than last year (obviously,
    several of the crashes last year were bad, taking out some
    of the major contenders)?

    Remember when they were blaming all the crashes on
    Spinaci bars?

  3. there's always crashes....just more it seems this year
    caught on camera....and they say timing is everything

    "Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or
    previous) races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there
    really more crashes this year than last year (obviously,
    several of the crashes last year were bad, taking out some
    of the major contenders)?

    --
    Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply

  4. vern said:

    there's always crashes....just more it seems this year
    caught on camera....and they say timing is everything

    It is much wetter and windier this year than last, so
    more crashes.

  5. "vern" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    there's always crashes....just more it seems this year
    caught on camera....and they say timing is everything

    "Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't remember this many crashes during last year's
    (or previous) races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are
    there really more crashes this year than last year
    (obviously, several of the crashes last year were bad,
    taking out some of the major contenders)?

    --
    Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply

    RAIN!

  6. "Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or
    previous) races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there
    really more crashes this year than last year (obviously,
    several of the crashes last year were bad, taking out some
    of the major contenders)?

    --
    Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply

    I think it's a combination of (a) More teams trying to
    contest the sprints (even if they have no business being
    there), (b) More GC contenders and their teams fighting for
    position to avoid splits/crashes in the peloton (everyone
    wants to be up front) and (c) wet roads, cobbles, tight
    turns, etc.

    -T

  7. As we now know, the trick is to get inside the 1km banner and then fall off:
    "We were fortunate that the crash was literally 10m inside the 1 km
    banner, otherwise we would have been docked half a minute...so it was
    bad luck and good luck."
    cyclingnews.comnews.php

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.