Road Cycling · Public discussion

A cras-prone Tour?

Started by Bob in CT · · Last activity · 7 posts · 487 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 July 2004
Last activity
9 July 2004
Original author
Bob in CT
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
487
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or previous)
    races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there really more crashes this
    year than last year (obviously, several of the crashes last year were bad,
    taking out some of the major contenders)?

    --
    Bob in CT
    Remove ".x" to reply

  2. "Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or previous)
    races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there really more crashes this
    year than last year (obviously, several of the crashes last year were bad,
    taking out some of the major contenders)?

    Remember when they were blaming all the crashes on Spinaci bars?

  3. there's always crashes....just more it seems this year caught on
    camera....and they say timing is everything

    "Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or previous)
    races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there really more crashes this
    year than last year (obviously, several of the crashes last year were bad,
    taking out some of the major contenders)?

    --
    Bob in CT
    Remove ".x" to reply

  4. vern said:

    there's always crashes....just more it seems this year caught on
    camera....and they say timing is everything

    It is much wetter and windier this year than last, so more crashes.

  5. "vern" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    there's always crashes....just more it seems this year caught on
    camera....and they say timing is everything

    "Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or previous)
    races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there really more crashes this
    year than last year (obviously, several of the crashes last year were bad,
    taking out some of the major contenders)?

    --
    Bob in CT
    Remove ".x" to reply

    RAIN!

  6. "Bob in CT" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't remember this many crashes during last year's (or previous)
    races. Am I just remembering wrong, or are there really more crashes this
    year than last year (obviously, several of the crashes last year were bad,
    taking out some of the major contenders)?

    --
    Bob in CT
    Remove ".x" to reply

    I think it's a combination of (a) More teams trying to contest the sprints
    (even if they have no business being there), (b) More GC contenders and
    their teams fighting for position to avoid splits/crashes in the peloton
    (everyone wants to be up front) and (c) wet roads, cobbles, tight turns,
    etc.

    -T

  7. As we now know, the trick is to get inside the 1km banner and then fall off:
    "We were fortunate that the crash was literally 10m inside the 1 km
    banner, otherwise we would have been docked half a minute...so it was
    bad luck and good luck."
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/jul04/jul10news

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.