Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?
Scott
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?
Scott
crossnutz said:Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?Scott
it's best to find out what the frame is optimized for. most modern xc
frames are now longer travel - if so, 80mm will be too short.
Most frames are 'designed' around certain fork travels. You should be able
to get info from the manufacturer as to what front fork travel they
recommend. For instance, my older santa cruz blur is designed for a 100mm
fork. My wife's Fisher Sugar is designed for an 80mm.
Andy
"crossnutz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?Scott
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 930 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
crossnutz said:Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?Scott
There's no advantage to more travel if you don't need it. If you're
racing, you probably don't need it. And for handling purposes, it
doesn't matter whether a fork is labeled 80 or 100mm. What matters is
the actual height of the fork, often described as "axle to crown
distance." The height varies with design (air vs. coil) and
manufacturer. Even this doesn't make very much difference in practical
terms, since most XC bikes handles fine with all 80-100mm forks.
-Vee
jim beam said:crossnutz said:Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?Scott
it's best to find out what the frame is optimized for. most modern xc
frames are now longer travel - if so, 80mm will be too short.
Ditto, what Jim said. Most are 100mm now but some of the racing frames
are still 80mm as XC racers prefer less travel.
If you get the wrong fork the steering response will be affected.
Chris
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:44:35 -0800, crossnutz <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?
If the terrain that you will encounter merits it, yes. If not, then
no. From here, I can't see the trail ahead of you.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.