Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

80 or 100 MM travel fork?

Started by crossnutz · · Last activity · 6 posts · 577 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 November 2006
Last activity
13 November 2006
Original author
crossnutz
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
577
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
    Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?

    Scott

  2. crossnutz said:

    Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
    Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?

    Scott

    it's best to find out what the frame is optimized for. most modern xc
    frames are now longer travel - if so, 80mm will be too short.

  3. Most frames are 'designed' around certain fork travels. You should be able
    to get info from the manufacturer as to what front fork travel they
    recommend. For instance, my older santa cruz blur is designed for a 100mm
    fork. My wife's Fisher Sugar is designed for an 80mm.
    Andy
    "crossnutz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
    Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?

    Scott

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
    It has removed 930 spam emails to date.
    Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
    Try SPAMfighter for free now!

  4. crossnutz said:

    Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
    Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?

    Scott

    There's no advantage to more travel if you don't need it. If you're
    racing, you probably don't need it. And for handling purposes, it
    doesn't matter whether a fork is labeled 80 or 100mm. What matters is
    the actual height of the fork, often described as "axle to crown
    distance." The height varies with design (air vs. coil) and
    manufacturer. Even this doesn't make very much difference in practical
    terms, since most XC bikes handles fine with all 80-100mm forks.

    -Vee

  5. jim beam said:
    crossnutz said:

    Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
    Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?

    Scott

    it's best to find out what the frame is optimized for. most modern xc
    frames are now longer travel - if so, 80mm will be too short.

    Ditto, what Jim said. Most are 100mm now but some of the racing frames
    are still 80mm as XC racers prefer less travel.

    If you get the wrong fork the steering response will be affected.

    Chris

  6. On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:44:35 -0800, crossnutz <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Looking at a FS frame with 2 1/2" of rear travel for a bit of XC racing.
    Is there any advantage to using a 100 MM fork?

    If the terrain that you will encounter merits it, yes. If not, then
    no. From here, I can't see the trail ahead of you.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.