Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

6.8 kg rule

Started by Alexey Merz · · Last activity · 8 posts · 563 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 August 2003
Last activity
10 August 2003
Original author
Alexey Merz
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
563
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There are at least two obvious reasons for a 6.8 kg/15 lb. minimum bike weight rule: (1) to make
    competition safer, by reducing the incentive to build stupid-light bikes; and (2) to make access to
    competition-more equitable by reducing potential benefits from insanely high-tech ultralight bikes.

    I suggest a third possibility (if this has been suggested and I missed it, apologies). Because it's
    reasonably straightforward to build a bike that weighs at least a half kilo less than the limit,
    this means that riders can be encouraged to carry a variety of telemetry devices that, as long as
    they are attached to the bike, confer no weight penalty. Such devices could make TV and web coverage
    more exciting and allow both teams and officials to monitor races more closely. Possibilities
    include: Cameras attached to bikes, particularly the bikes of especially psychotic descenders during
    mountain stages; instrumentation: HRMs, clinometers (how steep was it when Hamilton blew past
    Ulrich?), accelerometers, power meters, microfluidic real-time drug-testing devices, etc.

    I'll be shocked we don't see widespread integration of these technologies into race coverage within
    a year. What other telemetry streams might be included? Ideas?

  2. In article said:

    There are at least two obvious reasons for a 6.8 kg/15 lb. minimum bike weight rule: (1) to
    make competition safer, by reducing the incentive to build stupid-light bikes; and (2) to make
    access to competition-more equitable by reducing potential benefits from insanely high-tech
    ultralight bikes.

    I suggest a third possibility (if this has been suggested and I missed it, apologies). Because
    it's reasonably straightforward to build a bike that weighs at least a half kilo less than the
    limit, this means that riders can be encouraged to carry a variety of telemetry devices that, as
    long as they are attached to the bike, confer no weight penalty. Such devices could make TV and
    web coverage more exciting and allow both teams and officials to monitor races more closely.
    Possibilities include: Cameras attached to bikes, particularly the bikes of especially psychotic
    descenders during mountain stages; instrumentation: HRMs, clinometers (how steep was it when
    Hamilton blew past Ulrich?), accelerometers, power meters, microfluidic real-time drug-testing
    devices, etc.

    I'll be shocked we don't see widespread integration of these technologies into race coverage
    within a year. What other telemetry streams might be included? Ideas?

    While live biometrics have been done (and are pretty cool) there isn't nearly the need for goofy
    onboard camera tricks in bike races (especially big ones like the TdF) as there is in
    motorsports, because there are already motorcycles that can get about as close as they dare to
    the action, and can give an even more personal look at the riders and the action than an on-board
    cam would likely manage.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] sfu.ca~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

  3. Rectal thermometers so we can see who is really cooking themselves...

  4. Automatic drug level transmission, though this would have so many transmitters going at the same
    time that it would lead to a total airspace logjam...;-)

  5. Alexey Merz wrote: <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    penalty. Such devices could make TV and web coverage more exciting and allow both teams and
    officials to monitor races more closely. Possibilities include: Cameras attached to bikes,
    particularly the bikes of especially psychotic descenders during mountain stages; instrumentation:
    HRMs, <snip>

    HRM data would be cool for TV viewers (esp. with a little pumping heart graphic!) but it would
    detract from the "bluff" element of the sport - imagine trying to appear in distress on a climb when
    your opponent's DS can see on his in-car TV that you're nowhere near your LT...

    &roo

  6. "Andrew Swan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Alexey Merz wrote: <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    penalty. Such devices could make TV and web coverage more exciting and allow both teams and
    officials to monitor races more closely. Possibilities include: Cameras attached to bikes,
    particularly the bikes of especially psychotic descenders during mountain stages;
    instrumentation: HRMs, <snip>

    HRM data would be cool for TV viewers (esp. with a little pumping heart graphic!) but it would
    detract from the "bluff" element of the sport - imagine trying to appear in distress on a climb
    when your opponent's DS can see on his in-car TV that you're nowhere near your LT...

    Good suggestion, I'm going to recommend that they put a HRM on each Seattle Mariner and display a
    pumping heart on the TV screen.

    All except for Edgar of course as I am not really sure that he is alive. <g>

    Dashii

    Quoted message said:


    &roo

  7. nick-<< Rectal thermometers so we can see who is really cooking themselves..

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Aren't those the thiings in the right DA shifter????

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  8. the Postal Service team (at least Lance) has an inclinometer built in to the CicloMaster computers
    on their bikes.

    I have the same basic unit on mine. Only difference is that I can't down load the info into my PC.

    It also has a simple rider power (Wattage) measuring setting.

    May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear for the hills! Chris

    Chris'Z Corner "The Website for the Common Bicyclist": geocities.comczcorner

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.