Power meters · Public discussion

40 min interval v. 2x20 minute

Started by LyncStar · · Last activity · 9 posts · 2,640 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
3 April 2007
Last activity
4 April 2007
Original author
LyncStar
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,640
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm trying to get the most bang for my buck, time wise. I'm currently doing the 2x20 minute FTP interval at least once per week. I was thinking of switching it to a straight 40 minutes (saves me the 5-10 minutes of recovery). I'm training to complete the Leadville 100 Mountain Bike Race in under 9hrs. I'm thinking the longer interval will be better suited to that goal.

    Also, on a related note, are there any training programs that use power for this type of race?

    Thanks much!

    Cheers,

    Tim

  2. FWIW I do 75 minutes at an average pace of 91% FTP at least twice a week right now. Why stop if you don't have to?

    BTW I use alot of raw honey in my water bottle when I skip the breaks.

  3. wiredued said:

    FWIW I do 75 minutes at an average pace of 91% FTP at least twice a week right now. Why stop if you don't have to?


    since the rest for the 2x20's is only supposed to be a couple of minutes at most (mental and drink break) just plow on through for the whole 40. That's what I do...

  4. Based on what little I understand of this interval training technique, riding 20x2 vs 40x1 leads to different results. When you do a 20, you are supposed to be totally stuffed by the end of 20 and not able to continue for another minute until you've had an easy spin. This would match a certain training level (L4) in the overall scheme. By doing a 40, you have to work at a power level that is lower than the above so as to be able to sustain it for the longer duration. So no, it's not the same.

  5. sogood said:

    Based on what little I understand of this interval training technique, riding 20x2 vs 40x1 leads to different results. When you do a 20, you are supposed to be totally stuffed by the end of 20 and not able to continue for another minute until you've had an easy spin. This would match a certain training level (L4) in the overall scheme. By doing a 40, you have to work at a power level that is lower than the above so as to be able to sustain it for the longer duration. So no, it's not the same.

    Actually, if you're spent at the end of 20 min you're riding way over your FTP. If you're at your FTP you should feel spent only after about 1 hr. IOW, CP20 does not equal FTP. Functional Threshold Power can be defined as power you can hold for 1 hr. That's why the best way to test it is to ride a 1hr TT.

    I usually do 3x20 min at FTP (or slightly below). That's about 13 watts less than my best 20 min effort. Riding at that level for 1 hr or even 40 min would be mentally too taxing for me, but with breaks I still put in 1 hr of FTP effort.

  6. Piotr said:

    Actually, if you're spent at the end of 20 min you're riding way over your FTP. If you're at your FTP you should feel spent only after about 1 hr. IOW, CP20 does not equal FTP. Functional Threshold Power can be defined as power you can hold for 1 hr. That's why the best way to test it is to ride a 1hr TT.

    I usually do 3x20 min at FTP (or slightly below). That's about 13 watts less than my best 20 min effort. Riding at that level for 1 hr or even 40 min would be mentally too taxing for me, but with breaks I still put in 1 hr of FTP effort.

    I pretty much concur with the above, but what type of interval is better when training for an endurance event of 9hrs in length?

  7. Piotr said:

    Actually, if you're spent at the end of 20 min you're riding way over your FTP. If you're at your FTP you should feel spent only after about 1 hr. IOW, CP20 does not equal FTP. Functional Threshold Power can be defined as power you can hold for 1 hr. That's why the best way to test it is to ride a 1hr TT.

    I usually do 3x20 min at FTP (or slightly below). That's about 13 watts less than my best 20 min effort. Riding at that level for 1 hr or even 40 min would be mentally too taxing for me, but with breaks I still put in 1 hr of FTP effort.


    Ummm... I think I'll need to go back and read again. I must have got 3-8mins L5 training method mixed up with sweat spot training of 2x20. Thanks for pointing it out.

  8. LyncStar said:

    I pretty much concur with the above, but what type of interval is better when training for an endurance event of 9hrs in length?

    I never had the need to train for that type of an event, or even the ambition to ride for more than 5 hrs. I can only assume that you'd want to learn to spend that kind of time in the saddle by actually doing it. I would probably also do some rides of 3-4 hrs at Level 3 intensity to teach your body to burn and store fuel more efficiently. I hope someone else can give you more insight. :o

  9. LyncStar said:

    ...but what type of interval is better when training for an endurance event of 9hrs in length?


    http://www.ultracycling.com/training/endurance_training.html

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.