UK and Europe · Public discussion

3rd party insurance

Started by Duncan Gray · · Last activity · 28 posts · 911 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
23 August 2006
Last activity
25 August 2006
Original author
Duncan Gray
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
911
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Did anyone catch the Channel 4 tv news bulletin at midday?

    There was a lawyer on who apparently does work for the CTC recommending
    cyclists take out 3rd party cover for their protection.

    The reasons were
    1) that a cyclist could cause an accident causing serious injury and face a
    huge claim against them. (it was pointed out that in the vast majority of
    cases the cyclist in the wronged party)
    and
    2) not having insurance leads to cyclists not pursuing claims they should,
    because of the fear of being counter-claimed.

    The interviewer dutifully tossed up the suggestion that insurance for
    cyclists should be compulsory, which the lady duly slapped down, pointing
    out that cases where there could be a claim against a cyclist were a tiny
    minority, and that such a law would be counter productive as it would
    discourage cycling and its health giving benefits.

    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available through
    membership of any organisation? My membership of the Mountaineering Council
    of Scotland gives me cover for mountain activities.

  2. On 23/08/2006 18:54, Duncan Gray said,

    Quoted message said:

    Did anyone catch the Channel 4 tv news bulletin at midday?

    There was a lawyer on who apparently does work for the CTC recommending
    cyclists take out 3rd party cover for their protection.

    <Snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available through
    membership of any organisation?

    The answer to that is in your second paragraph. The CTC gives Third
    Party Insurance to all members. Therefore all CTC members here have
    insurance.

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  3. Duncan Gray said:

    Did anyone catch the Channel 4 tv news bulletin at midday?

    There was a lawyer on who apparently does work for the CTC
    recommending cyclists take out 3rd party cover for their protection.


    .........

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available
    through membership of any organisation? My membership of the
    Mountaineering Council of Scotland gives me cover for mountain
    activities.

    CTC membership provides such cover as part of the membership deal, as does
    membership of a few other cycling clubs.

    As with mountaineering 3rd party cover, the actual insurance costs are
    trivial, the cost is nearly all in the administration of setting up a
    policy.

    - Nigel

    --
    Nigel Cliffe,
    Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/

  4. "Duncan Gray" <[email hidden]>typed

    Quoted message said:

    Did anyone catch the Channel 4 tv news bulletin at midday?

    Quoted message said:

    There was a lawyer on who apparently does work for the CTC recommending
    cyclists take out 3rd party cover for their protection.

    Quoted message said:

    The reasons were
    1) that a cyclist could cause an accident causing serious injury and face a
    huge claim against them. (it was pointed out that in the vast majority of
    cases the cyclist in the wronged party)
    and
    2) not having insurance leads to cyclists not pursuing claims they should,
    because of the fear of being counter-claimed.

    Quoted message said:

    The interviewer dutifully tossed up the suggestion that insurance for
    cyclists should be compulsory, which the lady duly slapped down, pointing
    out that cases where there could be a claim against a cyclist were a tiny
    minority, and that such a law would be counter productive as it would
    discourage cycling and its health giving benefits.

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available
    through
    membership of any organisation? My membership of the Mountaineering Council
    of Scotland gives me cover for mountain activities.

    I belong to the CTC and LCC (London Cycling Campaign). They both provide
    3rd party insurance as part of membership.

    --
    Helen D. Vecht: [email hidden]
    Edgware.

  5. "Paul Boyd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 23/08/2006 18:54, Duncan Gray said,

    Quoted message said:

    Did anyone catch the Channel 4 tv news bulletin at midday?

    There was a lawyer on who apparently does work for the CTC recommending
    cyclists take out 3rd party cover for their protection.

    <Snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available
    through membership of any organisation?

    The answer to that is in your second paragraph. The CTC gives Third Party
    Insurance to all members. Therefore all CTC members here have insurance.

    Ah, thanks. Should have followed it through further.
    The news item wasn't overtly a push for new members....

  6. In message <[email hidden]>

    Paul Boyd said:

    On 23/08/2006 18:54, Duncan Gray said,

    Quoted message said:

    Did anyone catch the Channel 4 tv news bulletin at midday?

    There was a lawyer on who apparently does work for the CTC recommending
    cyclists take out 3rd party cover for their protection.

    <Snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available through
    membership of any organisation?

    The answer to that is in your second paragraph. The CTC gives Third
    Party Insurance to all members. Therefore all CTC members here have
    insurance.

    Yes as well as CTC, it's worth noting that many home comprehensive
    insurance policies will include 3rd party liability that may include
    cycling, also many vacation and travel insurance policies will also
    cover cycling. For example I have annual insurance for mountaineering
    and ski-mountaineering which also covers most other leisure and sporting
    activities with a few listed exceptions (e.g. flying as a pilot, cave
    diving). As always read the small print to see what is and isn't
    included.

    Cheers,

    Mike
    --
    o/ \\ // |\ ,_ o Mike Clark
    <\__,\\ // __o | \ / /\, "A mountain climbing, cycling, skiing,
    "> || _`\<,_ |__\ \> | immunology lecturer, antibody engineer and
    ` || (_)/ (_) | \corn computer user"

  7. "Duncan Gray" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available
    through membership of any organisation? My membership of the
    Mountaineering Council of Scotland gives me cover for mountain activities.

    Yes.

    If you join the CTC you get such insurance as a benefit of being a member.
    Similarly if you have British Cycling membership.

    Husband, son & self are CTC members.

    Cheers, helen s

  8. CTC also supported me with free legal assistance in pursuing my claim
    against the driver ( blind & deaf - due to howling kids and nagging wife)
    who gave me 3 broken ribs.
    Totally no cost to me with cycling aware solicitors.

    The result is the purchase of a new ICE Trice Q NT for delivery end of
    September.

    To be honest I am not sure if the end result was worth all the pain -- but
    since the pain is over --- I am happy to be taking on the new trike. If I
    just banked it, it would be whittled away slowly to no effect.

    So I am happy with CTC provision of legal assistance, and their 3rd party
    insurance -- but as CTC know, I am distinctly not a "yes man". There are, I
    believe, many areas where CTC's policies are definitely anti "Touring" and I
    am above all a touring cyclist.

    but I reckon that a specialist insurance cover is a good idea

    --
    Trevor A Panther
    In South Yorkshire,
    England, United Kingdom.
    www.tapan.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

    "wafflycat" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Duncan Gray" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available
    through membership of any organisation? My membership of the
    Mountaineering Council of Scotland gives me cover for mountain
    activities.

    Yes.

    If you join the CTC you get such insurance as a benefit of being a member.
    Similarly if you have British Cycling membership.

    Husband, son & self are CTC members.

    Cheers, helen s

  9. in message <[email hidden]>, Duncan Gray

    (') said:

    Did anyone catch the Channel 4 tv news bulletin at midday?

    There was a lawyer on who apparently does work for the CTC recommending
    cyclists take out 3rd party cover for their protection.

    The reasons were
    1) that a cyclist could cause an accident causing serious injury and
    face a huge claim against them. (it was pointed out that in the vast
    majority of cases the cyclist in the wronged party)
    and
    2) not having insurance leads to cyclists not pursuing claims they
    should, because of the fear of being counter-claimed.

    The interviewer dutifully tossed up the suggestion that insurance for
    cyclists should be compulsory, which the lady duly slapped down,
    pointing out that cases where there could be a claim against a cyclist
    were a tiny minority, and that such a law would be counter productive
    as it would discourage cycling and its health giving benefits.

    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available
    through membership of any organisation? My membership of the
    Mountaineering Council of Scotland gives me cover for mountain
    activities.

    If you're a member of British Cycling, or the Scottish Cyclists' Union,
    or the Cyclists Touring Club, or I /think/ any club affiliated to
    British Cycling, you're covered. I'm a member of British Cycling.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    ;; If Python is executable pseudocode,
    ;; then Perl is executable line noise
    -- seen on Slashdot.

  10. wafflycat said:

    "Duncan Gray" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available
    through membership of any organisation? My membership of the
    Mountaineering Council of Scotland gives me cover for mountain activities.

    Yes.

    If you join the CTC you get such insurance as a benefit of being a member.
    Similarly if you have British Cycling membership.

    IIRC you only get third party cover at silver or gold BC membership,
    not bronze.
    I read the blurb when deciding which if any to get for Rachel (as it
    was free she got silver so is fully insured for travel on the road.)

    ...d

  11. Pinky said:

    The result is the purchase of a new ICE Trice Q NT for delivery end of
    September.

    To be honest I am not sure if the end result was worth all the pain -- but
    since the pain is over --- I am happy to be taking on the new trike. If I
    just banked it, it would be whittled away slowly to no effect.

    It wasn't really choice that you made though, was it? Given that the
    pain would have been inflicted on you anyway, I'm sure the Trice looks
    like great value. I wish you well to use it.

    --
    Dave...

  12. Simon Brooke said:

    If you're a member of British Cycling, or the Scottish Cyclists' Union,
    or the Cyclists Touring Club, or I /think/ any club affiliated to
    British Cycling, you're covered. I'm a member of British Cycling.

    Having queried BC's strong recommendation that helmets be worn by *all*
    cyclists (the word "essential" for new cyclists, and phrase "don't even
    think of cycling without one" once graced their web-site, their
    communications officer Phil Ingham suggested I join, with one of the
    benefits being the insurance. It was, he said "just as essential as a
    helmet". Well, quite... But being a CTC member I'm insured anyway so
    declined his offer to part with money so they could mindlessly promote
    helmets with some of it.

    With the launch of their "everyday cycling" site I queried the degree to
    which "everyday cycling" should be portrayed as apparently requiring
    lycra and helmets all the time, and got a message back that "We have
    taken the range of empirical evidence into account and made a decision"
    to portray everyone pictured in a helmet as BC reccommneds helmets to
    all. I asked what that evidence /was/, and got passed back to... Phil
    Ingham again, who wouldn't answer but if I disagreed I should join BC
    and work for change within. Again, not wishing to fund needless helmet
    promotion I declined the offer, but asked again what the evidence
    underpinning the decision was. No answer.
    So since the "communications manager" of BC won't communicate with me a
    s a non-member, perhaps those of you that are members might like to ask
    Mr. Ingham the same question: what is the evidence they have considered
    for their stance that *all* cyclists are strongly recommended to wear
    helmets?

    I'd like to know what it is, and as a corollary why it's apparently in
    the interests of non-member UK cyclists and cycling in the UK in general
    to keep that information secret.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  13. Pinky said:

    The result is the purchase of a new ICE Trice Q NT for delivery end of
    September.

    I remember you saying you were going to try one out.. Glad you have got
    it.

    And you should still be able to tow the BoB Yak..

    ...d

  14. "David Martin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Pinky said:

    The result is the purchase of a new ICE Trice Q NT for delivery end of
    September.

    I remember you saying you were going to try one out.. Glad you have got
    it.

    And you should still be able to tow the BoB Yak..

    ..d


    David,
    Yes I am quietly chuffed and can't wait to get my fingers on it ( feet?). I
    feel a bit daunted by having to assemble it myself but it will be a steep
    learning curve useful to me on my long tours. ICE don't like the stresses
    put on the rear wheel by the BOB Yak when cornering -- since the trike
    doesn't lean in and the effect of centrifugal forces of a heavy trailer. I
    have actually just sold my Yak ( sad to see it go) and I am now looking at
    two wheeled Carry freedom, Bluebird and Burley trailers as a replacement
    for next years tour. I shall probably keep my VP2 as a local shopping and
    run around.
    Trevor A Panther
    In South Yorkshire,
    England, United Kingdom.
    www.tapan.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

  15. In message <[email hidden]>
    Peter Clinch <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    So since the "communications manager" of BC won't communicate with me a
    s a non-member, perhaps those of you that are members might like to ask
    Mr. Ingham the same question: what is the evidence they have considered
    for their stance that *all* cyclists are strongly recommended to wear
    helmets?

    I'd like to know what it is, and as a corollary why it's apparently in
    the interests of non-member UK cyclists and cycling in the UK in general
    to keep that information secret.

    Pete.

    Hi Pete,

    Yes I saw your letter in the CTC magazine where you referred to having
    gone to the medical library and reading the evidence for yourself.

    I quite agree with the assessment. The available medical evidence does
    not suggest that there is a significant increase in serious risks
    associated with cycling without a cycle helmet.

    Mike
    --
    o/ \\ // |\ ,_ o Mike Clark, C.U. Department of Pathology
    <\__,\\ // __o | \ / /\, "a mountain climbing, cycling, skiing,
    "> || _`\<,_ |__\ \> | immunology lecturer, antibody engineer and
    ` || (_)/ (_) | \corn computer user"<http://www.path.cam.ac.uk/~mrc7/>

  16. Peter Clinch said:

    With the launch of their "everyday cycling" site I queried the degree to
    which "everyday cycling" should be portrayed as apparently requiring
    lycra and helmets all the time, and got a message back that "We have
    taken the range of empirical evidence into account and made a decision" ...

    Bet you a tenner they haven't. Those are simply weasel words to fob you
    off. That is why they are unable to give you any specifics. But of
    course you knew that already.

    --
    Dave...

  17. dkahn400 said:

    Bet you a tenner they haven't. Those are simply weasel words to fob you
    off. That is why they are unable to give you any specifics. But of
    course you knew that already.

    Indeed. I did wonder why you limited yourself to a tenner... ;-/

    But some more pressure might just set some Clue Bells ringing, and if
    it's from existing BC members then the excuse that time shouldn't be
    spent on non-members goes out the window, and the more excuses that go
    out of the window the more chance of someone having to stop and *think*
    for a change.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  18. in message <[email hidden]>, Peter Clinch

    (') said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    If you're a member of British Cycling, or the Scottish Cyclists'
    Union, or the Cyclists Touring Club, or I /think/ any club affiliated
    to British Cycling, you're covered. I'm a member of British Cycling.

    So since the "communications manager" of BC won't communicate with me a
    s a non-member, perhaps those of you that are members might like to ask
    Mr. Ingham the same question: what is the evidence they have considered
    for their stance that *all* cyclists are strongly recommended to wear
    helmets?

    Mail me his email address, and I will take him up on it.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; my other religion is Emacs

  19. Simon Brooke said:

    Mail me his email address, and I will take him up on it.

    You (should) have mail...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  20. Duncan Gray said:

    Did anyone catch the Channel 4 tv news bulletin at midday?

    There was a lawyer on who apparently does work for the CTC recommending
    cyclists take out 3rd party cover for their protection.

    The reasons were
    1) that a cyclist could cause an accident causing serious injury and face a
    huge claim against them. (it was pointed out that in the vast majority of
    cases the cyclist in the wronged party)
    and
    2) not having insurance leads to cyclists not pursuing claims they should,
    because of the fear of being counter-claimed.

    The interviewer dutifully tossed up the suggestion that insurance for
    cyclists should be compulsory, which the lady duly slapped down, pointing
    out that cases where there could be a claim against a cyclist were a tiny
    minority, and that such a law would be counter productive as it would
    discourage cycling and its health giving benefits.

    Does anyone here have public liability insurance, or is it available through
    membership of any organisation? My membership of the Mountaineering Council
    of Scotland gives me cover for mountain activities.


    I think the number of cyclist with public liability insurance is vastly
    underestimated, and you certainly don't need to join the CTC to obtain it.
    Most 'householders' have insurance with a 'public liability'extension
    that would normally give almost unlimited sums for such things. It will
    normally include family members as long as permanent address is at home
    (ie children are covered when at University)
    This cover is normally for things like a branch of a tree in your garden
    falling on someone, but will usually cover any act as long as it doesn't
    involve a motor vehicle. Mine will cover accident with motorised
    equipment ON my property but not off. (so I'm covered if I chop off
    someones toe on my lawn but not on the gress verge outside my house!)

    A few years ago I dug at a few typical 'houshold' policies with all
    risks extensions, and "The only vehicles excluded in their 'Liability'
    sections were mechanically or motor propelled ones"

    see:
    http://www.camcycle.org.uk/newsletters/44/article10.html
    "Cycling as house contents"

    Now my daught is in a 'shared house' in London, I'll get her to check
    her new insurance policy, and if she isn't covered I'll get her to join LCC.

    This isn't 'Legal' advice but don't get frightened by 'Daily Mail' type
    stories and join the throng who say cyclists must have specific
    insurance when most of us already have it and only have to read the
    right bit of our 'household' policy.

    Jim Chisholm

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.