General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

2PD and vegetables...

Started by Mirek Fidler · · Last activity · 71 posts · 2,014 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 April 2004
Last activity
29 April 2004
Original author
Mirek Fidler
Posts
71
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,014
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 71
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi,

    I was just thinking a little about famous "2PD approach" and
    I have one simple question:

    I currently tend to eat about 2PD of green vegetables (low-
    carb, low-calorie) each day.

    Does 2pd mean that I should cut consumption of veggies?

    Also, my favorite breakfast is ground flaxseed with hot
    water. Should I weight it before adding a water or after?
    Same question applies to pasta...

    Mirek

  2. You've just pointed out the huge flaw with the "2PD"
    approach. My dinner weighes 2.5 lbs yet has only 500
    calories. Eating tons of veggies is healthy by all accounts,
    the "2PD" quack diet would prevent that. It's simple,
    calories count, not weight of food. The "2PD" approach
    doesn't pass the sniff test.

    "Mirek Fidler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]-
    berlin.de>...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi,

    I was just thinking a little about famous "2PD approach"
    and I have one simple question:

    I currently tend to eat about 2PD of green vegetables (low-
    carb, low-calorie) each day.

    Does 2pd mean that I should cut consumption of veggies?

    Also, my favorite breakfast is ground flaxseed with hot
    water. Should I weight it before adding a water or after?
    Same question applies to pasta...

    Mirek

  3. hsph.harvard.edupyramids.html

    the Harvard Food Pyramid...... supporting Brad's
    comments here

    "Brad Sheppard" <.com> wrote in message .com...

    Quoted message said:

    You've just pointed out the huge flaw with the "2PD"
    approach. My dinner weighes 2.5 lbs yet has only 500
    calories. Eating tons of veggies is healthy by all
    accounts, the "2PD" quack diet would prevent that. It's
    simple, calories count, not weight of food. The "2PD"
    approach doesn't pass the sniff test.

    "Mirek Fidler" <.cz> wrote in message .de>...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi,

    I was just thinking a little about famous "2PD approach"
    and I have one simple question:

    I currently tend to eat about 2PD of green vegetables
    (low-carb, low-calorie) each day.

    Does 2pd mean that I should cut consumption of veggies?

    Also, my favorite breakfast is ground flaxseed with hot
    water. Should I weight it before adding a water or
    after? Same question applies to pasta...

    Mirek

  4. Mirek Fidler said:

    Hi,

    I was just thinking a little about famous "2PD approach"
    and I have one simple question:

    I currently tend to eat about 2PD of green vegetables (low-
    carb, low-calorie) each day.

    Does 2pd mean that I should cut consumption of veggies?

    Also, my favorite breakfast is ground flaxseed with hot
    water. Should I weight it before adding a water or after?
    Same question applies to pasta...

    Mirek

    If you are overweight (i.e. your doctor is advising you to
    lose weight), you should be make an "across the board"
    reduction in the *amount* of what you are eating. The 2PD
    approach works to guide you in making this reduction.
    Think of the 2PD approach as less fat, less protein, *and*
    less carbs (i.e. less food). What you should be weighing
    is what is going into your mouth (hydrated flaxseed and
    hydrated pasta).

    Hope this helps you.

    Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

    Andrew

    --
    Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
    Board-Certified Cardiologist
    heartmdphd.comheartmdphd.com

    **
    Who is the humblest person in the universe?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    What is all this about?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    Is this spam?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

  5. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I was just thinking a little about famous "2PD approach"
    and I have


    one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    simple question:

    I currently tend to eat about 2PD of green vegetables
    (low-carb, low-calorie) each day.

    Does 2pd mean that I should cut consumption of veggies?

    Also, my favorite breakfast is ground flaxseed with hot
    water.


    Should I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    weight it before adding a water or after? Same question
    applies to pasta...

    Mirek

    If you are overweight (i.e. your doctor is advising
    you to lose


    weight),

    Quoted message said:

    you should be make an "across the board" reduction in the
    *amount* of


    what

    Quoted message said:

    you are eating. The 2PD approach works to guide you in
    making this reduction. Think of the 2PD approach as less
    fat, less protein, *and*


    less

    Quoted message said:

    carbs (i.e. less food). What you should be weighing is
    what is going


    into

    So it would mean less vegetables for me?

    Mirek

  6. Mirek..... you are eating virtually carb free vegetables, so
    reducing them isn't going to have much of a reduction in
    your carbohydrate OR calorie intake

    not all foods are created equally and that is what is
    missing from the 2PD approach

    an incomplete list of the "carb free veggies" is as
    follows...... hope this helps......

    cabbage, lettuce, tomato (only 1), cucumber, zucchini,
    marrow, cauliflower, celery, rhubarb, yellow or green beans,
    bean sprouts, spinach, greens (beet greens, swiss chard),
    radishes, red or green peppers, broccoli, brussel sprouts,
    asparagus, mushrooms, parsley, onions (1/2 cup)

    "Mirek Fidler" <.cz> wrote in message .news.uni-berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I was just thinking a little about famous "2PD
    approach" and I have


    one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    simple question:

    I currently tend to eat about 2PD of green vegetables
    (low-carb, low-calorie) each day.

    Does 2pd mean that I should cut consumption of
    veggies?

    Also, my favorite breakfast is ground flaxseed with
    hot water.


    Should I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    weight it before adding a water or after? Same
    question applies to pasta...

    Mirek

    If you are overweight (i.e. your doctor is advising you
    to lose


    weight),

    Quoted message said:

    you should be make an "across the board" reduction in
    the *amount* of


    what

    Quoted message said:

    you are eating. The 2PD approach works to guide you in
    making this reduction. Think of the 2PD approach as less
    fat, less protein, *and*


    less

    Quoted message said:

    carbs (i.e. less food). What you should be weighing is
    what is going


    into

    So it would mean less vegetables for me?

    Mirek

  7. Brad Sheppard said:

    You've just pointed out the huge flaw with the "2PD"
    approach. My dinner weighes 2.5 lbs

    That's a huge dinner.

    Quoted message said:

    yet has only 500 calories.

    You would only know this if you had a bomb calorimeter,
    which I doubt.

    Quoted message said:

    Eating tons of veggies is healthy by all accounts,

    Eating tons of anything is unhealthy.

    Quoted message said:

    the "2PD" quack diet would prevent that.

    Sounds like you are angry about something. What angers you?

    Quoted message said:

    It's simple, calories count, not weight of food.

    Until people have a practical way of accurately ascertaining
    the calories of the food they eat, calories are useful only
    in research.

    Quoted message said:

    The "2PD" approach doesn't pass the sniff test.

    The 2PD approach works.

    Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

    Andrew

    --
    Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
    Board-Certified Cardiologist
    heartmdphd.comheartmdphd.com

    **
    Who is the humblest person in the universe?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    What is all this about?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    Is this spam?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

  8. Tiger Lily said:

    hsph.harvard.edupyramids.html

    the Harvard Food Pyramid...... supporting Brad's
    comments here

    The Food Pyramid has nothing to do with losing weight for
    those who are overweight.

    Truth is simple.

    Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

    Andrew

    --
    Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
    Board-Certified Cardiologist
    heartmdphd.comheartmdphd.com

    **
    Who is the humblest person in the universe?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    What is all this about?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    Is this spam?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

  9. Mirek Fidler said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I was just thinking a little about famous "2PD
    approach" and I have


    one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    simple question:

    I currently tend to eat about 2PD of green vegetables
    (low-carb, low-calorie) each day.

    Does 2pd mean that I should cut consumption of
    veggies?

    Also, my favorite breakfast is ground flaxseed with
    hot water.


    Should I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    weight it before adding a water or after? Same
    question applies to pasta...

    Mirek

    If you are overweight (i.e. your doctor is advising you
    to lose


    weight),

    Quoted message said:

    you should be make an "across the board" reduction in
    the *amount* of


    what

    Quoted message said:

    you are eating. The 2PD approach works to guide you in
    making this reduction. Think of the 2PD approach as less
    fat, less protein, *and*


    less

    Quoted message said:

    carbs (i.e. less food). What you should be weighing is
    what is going


    into

    So it would mean less vegetables for me?

    Less of *everything*.

    Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

    Andrew

    --
    Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
    Board-Certified Cardiologist
    heartmdphd.comheartmdphd.com

    **
    Who is the humblest person in the universe?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    What is all this about?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    Is this spam?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

  10. the food pyramid has EVERYTHING to do with a healthy diet

    are you saying that isn't important??

    "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tiger Lily said:

    hsph.harvard.edupyramid
    s.html

    the Harvard Food Pyramid...... supporting Brad's
    comments here

    The Food Pyramid has nothing to do with losing weight for
    those who are overweight.

    Truth is simple.

    Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

    Andrew

    --
    Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist
    heartmdphd.comheartmdphd.com

    ** Who is the humblest person in the universe?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    What is all this about?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    Is this spam? makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

  11. Quoted message said:

    Mirek..... you are eating virtually carb free vegetables,
    so reducing


    them

    Quoted message said:

    isn't going to have much of a reduction in your
    carbohydrate OR


    calorie

    Quoted message said:

    intake

    Calm down, I am far from taking 2PD approach 🙂

    Actually, I think I was quite succesful replacing all
    high-carb foods by veggies, decreasing my BMI from 29 to
    24 in 5 months.

    I just was thinking about 2PD.... And in fact, I think it
    is not complete quackery. In fact, for some people, it
    might work quite well. They could be getting somewhat
    less micronutriens than I do, but weightloss itself is a
    good thing...

    Mirek

  12. "Brad Sheppard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You've just pointed out the huge flaw with the "2PD"
    approach. My dinner weighes 2.5 lbs yet has only 500
    calories. Eating tons of veggies is healthy by all
    accounts, the "2PD" quack diet would prevent that. It's
    simple, calories count, not weight of food. The "2PD"
    approach doesn't pass the sniff test.

    I'm not sure I fully agree with you. I think there are 3
    questions one must ask about a diet for the purpose of
    losing weight.

    1. Would one lose weight on it? If one sticks to a diet that
    has some semblance to what a normal person would eat than
    I think yes, but I'm not 100% sure. 2lbs of butter would
    probably not work, but that is not what a normal person
    would eat. So in order to lose weight, one does need some
    sort of balance but nothing as elaborate as strict
    following of the food pyramid.

    2. Would you stay healthy on it. I think yes so long
    as you stay balanced in your approach, but I would
    take vitamins.

    3. Would people stick with it. I don't have a clue. Maybe
    you would get wrapped up in finding little tricks like
    freeze dried ice cream.

    I don't think Dr. Chung has made the case that this will
    work better than other diets - particularly on point 3 - but
    I don't think you can dismiss it out of hand either.

    I will now duck behind a wall. 🙂

    Bill

  13. "Mirek Fidler" <.cz> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Mirek..... you are eating virtually carb free
    vegetables, so reducing


    them

    Quoted message said:

    isn't going to have much of a reduction in your
    carbohydrate OR


    calorie

    Quoted message said:

    intake

    Calm down, I am far from taking 2PD approach 🙂

    lol...... i didn't think you were :-)

    the beauty of the "virtually carb free veggies" is that they
    are coincidentally the ones full of anti-oxidants and are
    very healthy for us

    imagine that..... no calories AND healthy! :-)

    Quoted message said:


    Actually, I think I was quite succesful replacing all high-
    carb foods by veggies, decreasing my BMI from 29 to 24 in
    5 months.

    most people who use the "carb free veggies" to bulk out
    their diet find this to be the case ........

    Quoted message said:


    I just was thinking about 2PD.... And in fact, I think it
    is not complete quackery. In fact, for some people, it
    might work quite well. They could be getting somewhat less
    micronutriens than I do, but weightloss itself is a good
    thing...

    oh....... first rule of dieting... less food....... makes
    sense for everyone as long as you can live with your diet,
    and it's one that is healthy for you

    kate

  14. "Tiger Lily" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    hsph.harvard.edupyramids.html

    the Harvard Food Pyramid...... supporting Brad's
    comments here

    "Vegetables (in abundance) and Fruits (2 to 3 times)."

    That's an amazingly non-quantitative recommendation.

    I had a friend who was obese, even though she worked really
    hard. Once, she told me that she had been a vegetarian for
    years, but that lifestyle hadn't helped her lose weight. "I
    ate a lot of French Fries, because potatoes are vegetables."
    (She was serious.)

    If you are going to give guidelines to hoi polloi, you need
    to give them something simple yet quantitative, which they
    can measure. A "serving" is not a quantitative amount, nor
    is "1-2 times/day" quantitative; people find ways to warp
    such restrictions to allow huge servings, and find ways to
    hop across boundaries (a quart of ice cream counts as 1
    serving of dairy...).

  15. "H.W. Stockman" <_THIS-link.net> wrote in message
    earthlink.net...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the Harvard Food Pyramid...... supporting Brad's
    comments here

    "Vegetables (in abundance) and Fruits (2 to 3 times)."

    That's an amazingly non-quantitative recommendation.

    I had a friend who was obese, even though she worked
    really hard. Once,


    she

    Quoted message said:

    told me that she had been a vegetarian for years, but that
    lifestyle


    hadn't

    Quoted message said:

    helped her lose weight. "I ate a lot of French Fries,
    because potatoes are vegetables." (She was serious.)

    lol...... natural selection at work?? what do you say

    Quoted message said:


    If you are going to give guidelines to hoi polloi, you
    need to give them something simple yet quantitative, which
    they can measure. A "serving" is not a quantitative
    amount, nor is "1-2 times/day" quantitative; people


    find

    Quoted message said:

    ways to warp such restrictions to allow huge servings, and
    find ways to


    hop

    Quoted message said:

    across boundaries (a quart of ice cream counts as 1
    serving of dairy...).

    the definition of "a serving" is further in the details of
    the pyramid information.... i believe that is why they give
    reference to the book as well

    Weight watchers, the diabetic association all have defined
    "serving sizes" for each fruit/vegetable

  16. "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" schrieb:

    Quoted message said:


    Brad Sheppard said:

    You've just pointed out the huge flaw with the "2PD"
    approach. My dinner weighes 2.5 lbs

    That's a huge dinner.

    If you eat a soup, you can easily eat 2.5 lbs.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    yet has only 500 calories.

    You would only know this if you had a bomb calorimeter,
    which I doubt.

    It doesn't really matter whether Brad ate 450 or 550
    calories.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Eating tons of veggies is healthy by all accounts,

    Eating tons of anything is unhealthy.

    Quoted message said:

    the "2PD" quack diet would prevent that.

    Sounds like you are angry about something. What
    angers you?

    Quoted message said:

    It's simple, calories count, not weight of food.

    Until people have a practical way of accurately
    ascertaining the calories of the food they eat, calories
    are useful only in research.

    To gain a general idea about the calories in your food isn't
    that difficult.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The "2PD" approach doesn't pass the sniff test.

    The 2PD approach works.

    Of course there will be quite some people for whom 2 lbs of
    whatever they fancy to eat is an adequate amount of food.
    But that would be purely coincidentally.

    Thorsten

    --
    "Nothing in biology makes sense, except in the light of
    evolution"

    (Theodosius Dobzhansky)

  17. "H.W. Stockman" schrieb:

    Quoted message said:


    "Tiger Lily" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:

    hsph.harvard.edupyramid
    s.html

    the Harvard Food Pyramid...... supporting Brad's
    comments here

    "Vegetables (in abundance) and Fruits (2 to 3 times)."

    That's an amazingly non-quantitative recommendation.

    I had a friend who was obese, even though she worked
    really hard. Once, she told me that she had been a
    vegetarian for years, but that lifestyle hadn't helped her
    lose weight. "I ate a lot of French Fries, because
    potatoes are vegetables." (She was serious.)

    It seems that the problem of your friend was not that she
    didn't know how to eat of vegetables, but that she
    erroneously thought that French Fries count as vegetables.
    The same quantity of green beans probably wouldn't have been
    a problem.

    Thorsten

    --
    "Nothing in biology makes sense, except in the light of
    evolution"

    (Theodosius Dobzhansky)

  18. "Tiger Lily" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de... [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    helped her lose weight. "I ate a lot of French Fries,
    because potatoes


    are

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    vegetables." (She was serious.)

    lol...... natural selection at work?? what do you say

    She's a very nice person, and normally has good common
    sense. Few people understand the terms used in dietic
    pronouncements; many are too busy just working to stay
    alive.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you are going to give guidelines to hoi polloi, you
    need to give them something simple yet quantitative,
    which they can measure. A "serving"


    is

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    not a quantitative amount, nor is "1-2 times/day"
    quantitative; people


    find

    Quoted message said:

    ways to warp such restrictions to allow huge servings,
    and find ways to


    hop

    Quoted message said:

    across boundaries (a quart of ice cream counts as 1
    serving of


    dairy...).

    Quoted message said:


    the definition of "a serving" is further in the details of
    the pyramid information.... i believe that is why they
    give reference to the book as well

    I don't see specific definitions in that URL. I doubt the
    average Joe or Josephine will do a lot of hunting in
    footnotes to find out the details.

  19. "Thorsten Schier" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It seems that the problem of your friend was not that she
    didn't know how to eat of vegetables, but that she
    erroneously thought that French Fries count as vegetables.
    The same quantity of green beans probably wouldn't have
    been a problem.

    That was the point. Diets are often described in terms that
    are not familiar to the average person, or the quantities in
    the diet are so ambiguous that cheating is too easy.

  20. H.W. Stockman said:

    "Tiger Lily" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:

    hsph.harvard.edupyramid
    s.html

    the Harvard Food Pyramid...... supporting Brad's
    comments here

    "Vegetables (in abundance) and Fruits (2 to 3 times)."

    That's an amazingly non-quantitative recommendation.

    I had a friend who was obese, even though she worked
    really hard. Once, she told me that she had been a
    vegetarian for years, but that lifestyle hadn't helped her
    lose weight. "I ate a lot of French Fries, because
    potatoes are vegetables." (She was serious.)

    If you are going to give guidelines to hoi polloi, you
    need to give them something simple yet quantitative, which
    they can measure. A "serving" is not a quantitative
    amount, nor is "1-2 times/day" quantitative; people find
    ways to warp such restrictions to allow huge servings, and
    find ways to hop across boundaries (a quart of ice cream
    counts as 1 serving of dairy...).

    Enter the 2PD approach :-)

    Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

    Andrew

    --
    Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
    Board-Certified Cardiologist
    heartmdphd.comheartmdphd.com

    **
    Who is the humblest person in the universe?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    What is all this about?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

    Is this spam?
    makeashorterlink.commakeashorterlink.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.