HAs anyone put a 29" wheel on their mountain bike (FRONT). I have a KHS softtail that I am bored with. Also, is a 700c the same as a 29er?😕
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
29" CONVERSION
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 27 April 2006
- Last activity
- 6 July 2006
- Original author
- COASTER
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 974
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
no 29" is not the same as 700, 700 is closer to 27". I don'
t see how you could fit a 29" wheel on your standard mountain bike. Maybe if you purchased a '29 fork, but then the front would be so high it would be like a chopper. -
hedgehog said:
no 29" is not the same as 700, 700 is closer to 27". I don'
t see how you could fit a 29" wheel on your standard mountain bike. Maybe if you purchased a '29 fork, but then the front would be so high it would be like a chopper....thats not necessarily a bad thing..
-
hedgehog said:
no 29" is not the same as 700, 700 is closer to 27". I don'
t see how you could fit a 29" wheel on your standard mountain bike. Maybe if you purchased a '29 fork, but then the front would be so high it would be like a chopper.That's outside diameter. Both the 700c and 29" standards use a 622mm bead seat diameter, so the rims are the same. A 29" front and 26" rear has been done before, but it might throw the steering off a bit on a standard frame:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2006/apr06/seaotter06/tech/?id=tech1/Trek_69er_side_view
Maybe if you were going from a suspension to a rigid fork, or at least a fork with less travel you might be able to keep the axel to crown distance the same, and it wouldn't mess with the head tube angle. -
artmichalek said:
That's outside diameter. Both the 700c and 29" standards use a 622mm bead seat diameter, so the rims are the same. A 29" front and 26" rear has been done before, but it might throw the steering off a bit on a standard frame:
cyclingnews.comtechOpen ↗
Maybe if you were going from a suspension to a rigid fork, or at least a fork with less travel you might be able to keep the axel to crown distance the same, and it wouldn't mess with the head tube angle.
I was thinking of using a Surly 29" rigid fork or a Pace RC29 Carbon Rigid fork (far nicer but about 5x the price). I don't want to invest a lot on this whim, but it would be cool to have a reason to ride the soft tail again as there are nice parts on it overall. WOuld the longer fork give the bike a slacker head tube angle? My ID has a 69 head tube and the KHS soft tail is NORBA 71.
-
COASTER said:
HAs anyone put a 29" wheel on their mountain bike (FRONT). I have a KHS softtail that I am bored with. :
Hey Coaster,
Did you ever try this conversion? I am curious as to how it worked out for you. I am toying with the idea of trying this myself and would love some feedback.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.