rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

26 vs 29

Started by rab2009 · · Last activity · 7 posts · 764 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
20 May 2007
Last activity
21 May 2007
Original author
rab2009
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
764
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. OK so im thinking of going with a 26 or a 29 incher for muni. Now if
    you have a 3 inch tire on the 26 and a 1.75 on the 29 then the
    difference in the diameters is only half an inch sooo then the total
    speed wouldn't be that different im guessing and the climbing could
    actually be easier on the 29 b/c of less weight. soo does anyone that
    has both 26 and 29 find this to be true or am i compleatly wrong with
    my logic here.

    --
    rab2009
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rab2009's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14533
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61033

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  2. The 29er will be much lighter, and have a larger circumference as well
    (by a considerable margin). I have a 26 x 2.6 (gazz jr) and a 29 x 2.2
    (Kenda Nevegal), and the 29er is significantly bigger around. A 26 x
    3.0 will be a little larger than my 26er setup, but not that much. Even
    with 102 cranks on my 26, I can't go nearly as fast as I can on the
    29er when I have the pedals in the 125 crank position.

    So if speed is your biggest concern, the 29 is a better choice. But if
    you ride rough trails, the lack of really fat tires for a 29 is a
    liability. For most of the trails I ride, I stick to my 24 x 3, and
    save the 29 for rides that are part on and part off road, with smoother
    and not-so-steep terrain. The 26er has a non-splined setup and I don't
    ride it so often anymore, and am in the process of setting it up with
    150s for my son to ride.

    --
    pkittle

    *==========================
    Peter Kittle * Chico, CA
    "The Revolution is just a t-shirt away."
    --Billy Bragg
    ==========================*
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    pkittle's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12111
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61033

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  3. I ride both a 26x2.6 and a 29. If you do get a 29", you'd get a 2.1 or
    2.2" tyre, cos anything less is silly for muni (yep I've tried it).

    For the last 5 months, I've been forced to ride only 29er, because I'm
    abroad, and only have the Schlumpf 29er with me. So I've been exploring
    what a 29er can ride. The 29er is significantly harder to ride down
    technical stuff. However, if you keep at it, practice a lot, and go for
    it hard, you can really bomb down things.

    I've just come back from riding one of our local downhill tracks on the
    29er, it's only a 'single black diamond', which on these trails
    basically means that there are no drops above about 6 inches, and
    nothing that would make you poo yourself on a bike. There are some
    pretty cool obstacles though, like one section theres a set of 6 or 7
    wood steps followed by a wooden bridge, followed by a drop, and it's
    mainly pretty steep too.

    On anything flat, if it's smooth singletrack, the 29 has a slight edge
    speedwise, but very little over a 26x2.6. Once it becomes a bit more
    technical, I think the difference evens out, and once you have to
    really throw the uni around, I think the 26 probably has an advantage.

    Climbing wise, on tarmac, I'd rather have the 29er, on easy fire roads,
    there's little between them, for technical climbing, there's no
    competition, the 26 wins hands down.

    The other thing about 29ers, is that with the lighter tyre, I find I
    crash harder on the 29er. It's gets caught on stuff more often, and
    because it's so light, it seems to affect it more. Because you're using
    a narrower tyre, you have to ride closer to the edge of your ability to
    power over things if you're ever going to get anywhere. You're also a
    little bit higher up, and generally riding slightly faster. I've got
    some big old cuts at the moment, cos I chucked myself down a cliff face
    the other day riding rocky singletrack on the 29er, fortunately no
    serious injuries.

    For a first muni, I'd always recommend a 26 (or a 24 if you want to buy
    a KH muni). A 29 is only worth using as a muni once you've developed
    the skills and leg strength to ride it over technical terrain. For
    someone good, a 29 is kind of fun to ride, and can sometimes be very
    fast, but if you get one straight away, you risk being stuck on easy
    trails, and not developing the technical skills to hit anything
    harder.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall

    my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61033

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  4. A bit off the topic, but how fast is it on the level road compared to a
    36" ? Does being geared up result in noticeable drag or control
    problems ?

    --
    feel the light
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    feel the light's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14551
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61033

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  5. what-ever you do, dont fall into the "lightness" trap that the 29er
    has..I agree with everthing in Joe's post.

    if you want to "muni" a 2.6 tyre with strong/thick sidwalls to really
    get the most out of "it" is needed at the least...not available for a
    29er

    --
    jagur

    theres enough BS in life, without mobius contributing.
    -forget_your_life-
    --------------------------------------
    -------*muni militia *-------
    *one wheeled death squad*
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    jagur's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/502
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61033

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  6. I just got back from a 29er ride on trails. I also have a 26x3" MUni.
    The two are completely different beasts. I would recommend a 29er if
    what you're looking to do is mostly fire road and cross-country things,
    especially if you intend to ride it on roads also. The 26x3" is awful
    on roads and is boring on fire roads. But if what you want to do is
    moderately to seriously technical MUni, the 26x3" will serve you much
    better. There were several trail sections today that I didn't even try
    on the 29x2.1 that would have been easy on the 26x3"; partly that's due
    to crank length, but in general the rides are not comparable; you have
    to look at a lot more than tire diameter.

    --
    tholub
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tholub's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/804
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61033

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  7. feel the light said:

    A bit off the topic, but how fast is it on the level road compared to a
    36" ? Does being geared up result in noticeable drag or control
    problems ?

    It's a little bit faster- maybe 5-10%. But it takes a bit more
    concentration to ride.

    --
    GizmoDuck

    The Uninam Tour 2008.....Hanoi to Saigon!!!

    Email me for details.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    GizmoDuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/794
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61033

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.