rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

24" or 26"?

Started by Ditch · · Last activity · 68 posts · 963 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
1 November 2005
Last activity
4 November 2005
Original author
Ditch
Posts
68
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
963
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–68 of 68
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. tholub said:

    That's very nice for you. Now let's try to address the concern of the
    poster.

    Yeah.
    I forgot not to add input on threads like this one.
    There are plenty of recommendations for the 26" size . . .
    and yet, we don't SEE very many of them at group meetings.

    I guess that I would suggest to the poster that he actually run the
    numbers to get an idea about how much more distance a 26" will cover.
    Of course, then others will chime in that it's impossible to gauge that
    because it will depend on the terrain, and so forth . . .

    As for tholub's off topic post about "staying on topic" try reading the
    first sentence of my off topic post. The implication there is that the
    poster did not fully describe all of the things that he would like to
    do with the wheel.

    Ride with groups? Ride distance only? What terrain? Get a workout?
    Climb much?

    If he takes the time to write a list of pros and cons,
    and most likely make the same decision that most have:

    24"

    Then again, there are always substandard riders that will swear that an
    inch or an ounce makes all of the difference in the world. Perhaps for
    them, it's true.

    --
    ChangingLINKS.com

    Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
    Drew Brown
    'Changing LINKS' (http://www.ChangingLINKS.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangingLINKS.com's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5468
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44390

  2. Most people have 24" nowadays because that's what the standard size for
    the KH muni is.

    In the UK, we actually have quite a lot of 26" riders at meets, who've
    been riding from the days of Pashleys and DMATUs. There are also people
    who don't ride 3" tyres.

    As far as I can tell from rides, there's no correlation between how
    good people are and wheel size. Roger Davies (probably the fastest muni
    rider in the UK) switches between 24 and 26 at a whim and I'm not sure
    it changes how fast he goes much.

    I'd get a 24" if I wanted to do trials or big drops. Otherwise there's
    not much difference between the wheel sizes (8%ish), except that the
    26" has a far wider range of tyres, meaning that as you get more
    skilled, there's availability of more specialised tyres for different
    purposes, such as faster, narrower xc tyres etc. Changing tyres makes
    far more difference than changing wheel size. Other than that, I don't
    see much difference between the sizes. I think most people just buy 24"
    because they want to be like Kris Holm or because that's what size the
    KH/onza/Qu-ax munis come in, not because they need the strength or
    anything.

    Dave - I'm commuting, on the coker at the moment. I do like muni on the
    29er with 125s, but I've recently been riding rocky technical stuff
    like in the peaks, which it isn't really suited for. It's great for
    woodland singletrack riding though and for some of the big cross
    country rides I've done in Yorkshire it'd be nice. I also don't ride
    the 29er on group muni rides usually, cos being that much faster than
    the people on the 24" munis with 165 cranks would be a bit cheeky, I'm
    already quite speedy anyway.

    I ride 26x2.6" gazz, which is nice. I hate the 26x2.3" gazz, it's
    different and funny and doesn't want to ride in a straight line.
    Everyone who rides it hates it. I've not tried the 26x3" gazz, I don't
    feel I need more boing and I don't bottom out on, so I've just never
    bothered changing.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall

    my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44390

  3. joemarshall said:

    I hate the 26x2.3" gazz, it's different and funny and doesn't want to
    ride in a straight line. Everyone who rides it hates it.

    That's what MikeFule had on his Pashley when I had a quick ride of it a
    few months ago. Very nasty indeed. It's a much squarer section than
    the others, more like a car tyre than a bike tyre. Didn't like turning
    at all - perhaps it would be OK on very soft mud but on anything hard
    it was terrible.

    --
    rob.northcott

    You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
    skydive twice
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rob.northcott's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7436
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44390

  4. joemarshall said:


    I ride 26x2.6" gazz, which is nice. I hate the 26x2.3" gazz, it's
    different and funny and doesn't want to ride in a straight line.
    Everyone who rides it hates it. I've not tried the 26x3" gazz, I don't
    feel I need more boing and I don't bottom out on, so I've just never
    bothered changing.

    Joe

    You can try my 26x3" when you're in Berkeley next week.

    --
    tholub
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tholub's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/804
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44390

  5. rob.northcott said:

    That's what MikeFule had on his Pashley when I had a quick ride of it a
    few months ago. Very nasty indeed. It's a much squarer section than
    the others, more like a car tyre than a bike tyre. Didn't like turning
    at all - perhaps it would be OK on very soft mud but on anything hard
    it was terrible.

    As documented in my later evangelical posts about the Holy Roller! I
    still can't believe how much difference that change of tyre made. The
    Gazz 2.3" is the work of the devil. Cast it out!

    --
    Mikefule

    dit dit diddle iddle dit dit... BANG! ow ow ow! that nasty
    unincyclinge man has deaded me! naughty unincyclinge man!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44390

  6. rob.northcott said:

    I don't know why people seem to think a
    26" is so much heavier than a 24" - assuming the same type of tyre the
    difference is less than 10%, which assuming my 1/4 of the unicycle
    weight guess means only 2.5% change in unicycle weight.

    Don't forget that the rim will be heavier too, as will the spokes and
    frame. Morever, most of that extra mass is rotating farther from the
    hub than in the 24" case. That in itself adds to the angular momentum
    and hence to a more sluggish "heavy" feel of the larger-wheel uni.

    Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict
    --
    "dit dit diddle diddle dit dit did-it, dit dit diddle diddle dit dit did-it, *dit* diddle dit dit *dit* diddle dit dit, diddle-diddle-diddle-diddle-dit dit diddle diddle dit dit did-it,... - Spudman"

  7. Klaas Bil said:
    rob.northcott said:

    I don't know why people seem to think a
    26" is so much heavier than a 24" - assuming the same type of tyre


    the

    Quoted message said:

    difference is less than 10%, which assuming my 1/4 of the unicycle
    weight guess means only 2.5% change in unicycle weight.

    Don't forget that the rim will be heavier too, as will the spokes and
    frame. Morever, most of that extra mass is rotating farther from the
    hub than in the 24" case. That in itself adds to the angular momentum
    and hence to a more sluggish "heavy" feel of the larger-wheel uni.

    I know what you mean, but it's still only about 6" of extra tyre/rim
    and 36" of spoke wire. OK, so it is all an extra inch away from the
    hub, so that may be enough to be noticable in acceleration. The
    overall extra weight though, which is what would matter for climbing
    and hops etc, isn't that much. Oh, I forgot the 2" of frame tube.
    There must be something good about 24" munis otherwise they wouldn't be
    so popular, but I'm not convinced the weight saving is that
    significant.

    --
    rob.northcott

    You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
    skydive twice
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rob.northcott's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7436
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44390

  8. I recently bought a new Torker 26" and changed the cranks from 170s to
    150s and I ride that when I want a fast pedaling workout at a decent
    speed but more often I choose to ride the Coker to cover distance

    --
    Daytripper63
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Daytripper63's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10789
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44390

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.