Quoted message said:
among other things, to the heavy hub and the sturdy frame it
necessitates. I'd guess it's not much lighter than a Coker, if at all,
so you're not going to make up a big difference there.
I'm sure my Schlumpf weighs significantly less than my coker, even with
the super-sturdy frame I've got on mine. The coker is almost all stock,
but I don't think you save *that* much weight by using an airfoil rim
on the coker. I'd guess the difference in tyre weight between coker and
29er is significantly more than the difference in hub weights.
The KH schlumpf won't need the silly frame because of the bearing
holder design, so the only difference in weight over the KH muni should
be the hub.
Like Ken says, the Schlumpf 29er is a little faster than a coker on the
flat. I'd say nowhere near as much faster as the 45" / 36" ratio would
suggest though, which is why I agree with David that the Schlumpf 24
which would gear up to only just over 36" would be slower than a
coker.
Incidentally, I dunno if Roger's changed his mind, but a couple of
weeks back he was saying that he didn't reckon the geared up coker (36"
geared to 54"😉 was up to much, and that he was actually faster on an
ungeared coker. Was he one of those front four cokers at unicon by any
chance?
Joe
--
joemarshall
my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44
------------------------------------------------------------------------
joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/51612