Professional Cycling · Public discussion

2001 tdf

Started by Guest · 9 January 2001 · Last activity 16 January 2008 · 24 posts · 3,545 views

← Back to Professional Cycling

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original post2001 tdfGuest · 9 Jan 2001 02 / This pagePosts 21–24Page 2 of 2 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #24thoughtforfood · 16 Jan 2008

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section: Professional Cycling
Published: 9 January 2001
Last activity: 16 January 2008
Original author: Guest
Posts: 24
Discussion status: Public discussion
Total views: 3,545
Views / 30 days: 0
Topics: Tour de France

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Crankyfeet
Archived post

16 January 2008, 02:30 UTC #21

classic1 said:
I think the UCI is on top of the drugs issue. It should all quieten down.
+1 Yes..I think the current doping crisis is just because Lance is there putting pressure on everyone. Once he retires... there will be no need to dope any longer.
Read my lips. We have definitely seen the worst of the doping problem.

Report
Bro Deal
Archived post

16 January 2008, 03:21 UTC #22

Frigo's Luggage said:
I think this David Miller kid has what it takes.

That Millar kid is a real straight shooter. I'm glad the Brits don't have to worry about all this doping.

Report
Crankyfeet
Archived post

16 January 2008, 03:38 UTC #23

I'm an investment advisor when I'm not following cycling. I don't normally give away advice publicly, but these trades are just slam dunks as we approach 2002:
1. Short oil.
2. Short gold.
3. Put as much money as you can into Enron shares.
4. Buy New Orleans property.

Report
thoughtforfood
Archived post

16 January 2008, 03:58 UTC #24

Yea, and again Frigo, thank GOD that the Clintons are gone. It is time we restore dignity and honesty to the presidency. That and I think that Rumsfeld is a really sharp guy who should be in charge of any military action in which we find ourselves, especially if it involves streamlining our forces and doing more with less.
Cranky, I also think Halliburton stock is dog, a definite sell on that one.

Report

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.