UK and Europe · Public discussion

20 mph zones

Started by naked_draughtsman · · Last activity · 6 posts · 613 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
3 May 2008
Last activity
3 May 2008
Original author
naked_draughtsman
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
613
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My local council has made a traffic order creating 20 mph zones on some of
    the residential streets near me (coming into force on Monday, although
    there's no signs up yet...)

    The order says that "no person shall drive a motor vehicle" etc.

    Is it normal to exempt cyclists from this sort of speed restriction or is
    it just that 'speeding' on a bicylce is assumed to be covered by other
    legislation?

    When roads get closed the wording is usually along the lines of "no person
    shall cause a vehicle to proceed along" which makes me wonder why there's
    a difference in this case.

    peter

  2. naked_draughtsman said:

    My local council has made a traffic order creating 20 mph zones on
    some of the residential streets near me (coming into force on Monday,
    although there's no signs up yet...)

    The order says that "no person shall drive a motor vehicle" etc.

    Is it normal to exempt cyclists from this sort of speed restriction
    or is it just that 'speeding' on a bicylce is assumed to be covered
    by other legislation?

    When roads get closed the wording is usually along the lines of "no
    person shall cause a vehicle to proceed along" which makes me wonder
    why there's a difference in this case.

    Speed limits apply only to motor vehicles, private roads and royal parks
    excluded.

    ~PB

  3. On Sat, 03 May 2008 03:38:51 -0500,

    naked_draughtsman said:

    My local council has made a traffic order creating 20 mph zones on some of
    the residential streets near me (coming into force on Monday, although
    there's no signs up yet...)

    The order says that "no person shall drive a motor vehicle" etc.

    Is it normal to exempt cyclists from this sort of speed restriction or is
    it just that 'speeding' on a bicylce is assumed to be covered by other
    legislation?

    When roads get closed the wording is usually along the lines of "no person
    shall cause a vehicle to proceed along" which makes me wonder why there's
    a difference in this case.

    All road speed limits apply only to motor vehicles. If they want to
    prosecute a cyclist it is for 'cycling furiously' or 'dangerous cycling'
    or somesuch.

    --
    Andy Leighton => [email hidden]
    "The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials"
    - Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_

  4. Pete Biggs said:
    naked_draughtsman said:

    Is it normal to exempt cyclists from this sort of speed restriction
    or is it just that 'speeding' on a bicylce is assumed to be covered
    by other legislation?

    Cyclists aren't specifically excepted, it's just that they aren't included
    in speeding legislation. Everything is legal unless it's banned. Speeding
    legislation specifies only motor vehicles.

    I assume that the speeding law was introduced because speeding motor
    vehicles were regarded as a problem and there wasn't already any law to deal
    with it.

    The story goes that AC cars were testing a Le Mans race car on the M1 at
    very high speed - ~185MPH. It made the press and probably put added
    pressure on the MoT to introduce a speed limit. I think there had been
    quite a few serious crashes on the M1 at around the same time as well.

    Pete

  5. In article said:
    Pete Biggs said:


    I assume that the speeding law was introduced because speeding motor
    vehicles were regarded as a problem and there wasn't already any law to deal
    with it.

    The story goes that AC cars were testing a Le Mans race car on the M1 at
    very high speed - ~185MPH. It made the press and probably put added
    pressure on the MoT to introduce a speed limit. I think there had been
    quite a few serious crashes on the M1 at around the same time as well.

    Speed limits that applied only to motor vehicles are much older - cyclists
    were never required to be preceded by someone walking with a red flag.

  6. In article <[email hidden]>, Pete
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Pete Biggs said:

    naked_draughtsman wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I assume that the speeding law was introduced because speeding motor
    vehicles were regarded as a problem and there wasn't already any law to deal
    with it.

    The story goes that AC cars were testing a Le Mans race car on the M1 at
    very high speed - ~185MPH. It made the press and probably put added
    pressure on the MoT to introduce a speed limit. I think there had been
    quite a few serious crashes on the M1 at around the same time as well.


    There were already speed limits when the first car drove on a British
    road in 1894 - remember the man with the red flag (introduced for steam
    engines, applied to cars when they first appeared). 1895 saw the limit
    raised (from 2/4mph) to 14mph, 1903 to 20mph, 1930 RTA abolished speed
    limits for cars, 1935 introduction of 30mph limit in towns, 1965
    'temporary' 70mph national limit, 1978 national 60/70mph limit made
    permanent.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.