zeeto said:Well,
A fairly significant difference in opinion!
Yes, as kdelong suggested, beauty-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder -- there was an early 60s vintage OLMO frameset which barely had any paint on it which sold for well over $1000US a few years ago.
I had a chance to query the buyer, and he indicated that his "first good bike" was that model OLMO -- definitely, a rosebud-moment.
zeeto said:
I used to be a bit of a bike and audio geek way back when, obviously I have a lot of bike terminology to brush up on and new stuff to learn, just so I can understand your reply!. I was told I'd get more by parting it out, hate to do that, and not sure I have the expertise anyway. I even have the Mafac tool kit that hangs from the bottom of the saddle.
Seems to me that $500 ( if I could get that) should buy one heck of a nice, modern bike these days but I'm probably wrong.
You are way-wrong with regard to what a new bike of comparable quality would cost you -- figure between $1300-to-$2000 (retail) might/(or, not) get you a bike of comparable quality in today's market (e.g., a nice Italian, steel frame with a mid-range Campagnolo group). You could spend less, and you could spend more, of course.
$500 will barely get an entry level bike at a bike shop, so while it may superficially seem like an improvement over a quality vintage bike, its components will be the equivalent of the low end Simplex components made with Delrin vs. the race-worthy Simplex components.
I don't know what you paid for your bike, but in 1970 the low end bikes in the shop would have been in the $90 range (e.g., Raleigh Record), and I seem to recall that a Raleigh with "low" end Campy was about $150+, I think, and the really nice Raleighs (for example) with Campagnolo Nuovo Record were about $200+. A custom BOB JACKSON with full Campy was probably about $325+, as I vaguely recall.
Between 1970 & 1975, there was significant (for the time) Dollar devaluation ... and, the devaluation of the Dollar has been accelerated over the past few years (although, currently to excess as a result of speculators in the Foreign Exchange -- and, other -- Futures/Commodity markets).
zeeto said:I'm 6' tall and the LeJeune frame is a little high for me to ride comfortably, especially considering I haven't ridden in a long time. Can't find an allen wrench to fit the stem so I can lower the seat, do I need to buy a special size?
If you're 6' tall, then I would say that the frame is not too large for you ... believe it or not, my 1970 vintage Gitane was the same size (!) and I'm only 5'9" ... AND, at the time, the top of my saddle was a shade over 29" above the center of the crank -- about the same as where your's appears to be ...
I must be shrinking, or something, because I now set the top of my saddle at 28.25" from the center of the crank. Most of my "regular" frames are now in the 52cm (c-c), but that's more for aesthetic reasons. I still have frames with 57cm (c-c) seat tubes & varying length top tubes; but, they are ultimately all within about a half-inch of the distance from the rear of the saddle to the back of the hoods on the brake levers.
BTW. The frame size is best measured by the length of the top tube, and your LeJeune frame should be fine for someone your height ...
I used to buy my non-bike-specific tools from SEARS. I buy them anywhere that is convenient, now (HARBOR FREIGHT as often as not). Now, you can buy METRIC tools anywhere ... even, a bike shop!
The seatpost binder bolt is usally 5mm. The stem binder bolt is generally a 6mm.
zeeto said:
Maybe changing over to top mounted shifters and some sort of dual-position brakes would make the ride more doable for me.
Yes, an alternative to the bar-end shifters would be to install a set of Campagnolo ERGO shifters if mixing new-with-old doesn't offend your aesthetic sensibilities.
zeeto said:
Where can I find these Classic people you speak of?
www.classicrendezvous.com