29 people needed to loose weight. All natural, Dr recommended. Please
email
me with a call back # and I will get back to you.
[email hidden]
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
#1 way to loose weight
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 5 February 2005
- Last activity
- 8 February 2005
- Original author
- J. W. Ott
- Posts
- 13
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 488
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
J. W. Ott said:
29 people needed to loose weight. All natural, Dr recommended. Please
email
me with a call back # and I will get back to you.[email hidden]
DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -
J. W. Ott said:
29 people needed to loose weight. All natural, Dr recommended. Please
email
me with a call back # and I will get back to you.[email hidden]
Nah, if I loosed my weight I might not be able to find it again and I
would hate to lose it.Regards
David
--
To email me, please include the letters DNF anywhere in the subject line.
All other mail is automatically deleted.
-
J. W. Ott said:
29 people needed to loose weight. All natural, Dr recommended. Please
email
me with a call back # and I will get back to you.[email hidden]
Nah, if I loosed my weight I might not be able to find it again and I
would hate to lose it.Regards
David
--
To email me, please include the letters DNF anywhere in the subject line.
All other mail is automatically deleted.
-
"J. W. Ott" <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:
29 people needed to loose weight.
You're misspelling "to". It should be "too".
--
Bob
Kanyak's Doghouse
http://www.kanyak.com -
"Opinicus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"J. W. Ott" <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:
29 people needed to loose weight.
You're misspelling "to". It should be "too".
No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is
incorrectly spelled.--
No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes -
"None Given" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Opinicus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"J. W. Ott" <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:
29 people needed to loose weight.
You're misspelling "to". It should be "too".
No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is
incorrectly spelled.--
No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The DishesI agree with this poster - to is correct, loose is not - should be lose
-
"Diane Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:bUzNd.27501$uA.7980
@fe1.texas.rr.com:Quoted message said:
"None Given" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Opinicus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"J. W. Ott" <[email hidden]> wrote
> 29 people needed to loose weight.You're misspelling "to". It should be "too".
No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is
incorrectly spelled.--
No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The DishesI agree with this poster - to is correct, loose is not - should be lose
You are both idiots.
b
-
Diane Ball said:
I agree with this poster - to is correct, loose is not - should be lose
I only care about how something is spelled when it's a real post, and not
some blathering spam, anyway, and even then, in a real post, I just let
the spelling, typos, and grammar slide 😉 -
"None Given" <[email hidden]> wrote
...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"J. W. Ott" <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:
29 people needed to loose weight.
You're misspelling "to". It should be "too".Quoted message said:
No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose'
that is
incorrectly spelled.Not if he meant "29 people needed weight that was too loose"
or (in the subject line) "the #1 weight that was way too
loose".--
Bob
Kanyak's Doghouse
http://www.kanyak.com -
"Opinicus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"None Given" <[email hidden]> wrote
..Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"J. W. Ott" <[email hidden]> wrote
> 29 people needed to loose weight.
You're misspelling "to". It should be "too".Quoted message said:
No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is
incorrectly spelled.Not if he meant "29 people needed weight that was too loose" or (in the
subject line) "the #1 weight that was way too loose".--
Bob
Kanyak's Doghouse
http://www.kanyak.com
I think J.W. Ott was being sarcastic about the extra 'o' in lose... since it
was spelled "loose" then "to" should be "too" just to make them match.
That's how I took it anyway. -
"Diane Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"None Given" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Opinicus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"J. W. Ott" <[email hidden]> wrote
> 29 people needed to loose weight.You're misspelling "to". It should be "too".
No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is
incorrectly spelled.But given he's a louse - do we care?
Nicky.
--
A1c 10.5/4.5/<6 Weight 95/78/72Kg
1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine
T2 DX 05/2004 -
"B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Diane Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:bUzNd.27501$uA.7980
@fe1.texas.rr.com:Quoted message said:
"None Given" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Opinicus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> "J. W. Ott" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > 29 people needed to loose weight.
>
> You're misspelling "to". It should be "too".No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is
incorrectly spelled.--
No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The DishesI agree with this poster - to is correct, loose is not - should be lose
You are both idiots.
Thank you very much!
Quoted message said:
b
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.