Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Olympic mountain bikes.

Started by Evan Evans · · Last activity · 13 posts · 590 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
29 August 2004
Last activity
30 August 2004
Original author
Evan Evans
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
590
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that all
    the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because almost all
    high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the olympians use
    the very best equiptment? Many including the winner didn't even have
    disc brakes.
    What gives?

  2. Evan Evans said:

    Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that
    all the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because
    almost all high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the
    olympians use the very best equiptment?

    I'd assume they used the very best suited for this kind of race
    (cross country) to win, with the limitation that pros will race the
    sponsor's equiptment were possible.

    --
    MfG/Best regards
    helmut springer

  3. Evan Evans said:

    Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that all
    the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because almost all
    high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the olympians use
    the very best equiptment? Many including the winner didn't even have
    disc brakes.
    What gives?

    I'm not sure about the disc brakes, I think most did have them, but as for
    hardtails - they are still perceived as being a little bit 'quicker' than
    full sussers for XC racing,though I tend to the opinion that full-sussers
    are better, but that is mainly the comfort factor making lesser mortals
    like me race for longer, - they are more comfortable over the bumps, thus
    you expend less energy absorbing the bumps with your arms and legs, so you
    are not so fatigued after 2 hours.
    The pros are several levels fitter than normal people so the extra bumping
    wont adversly affect them ,as well as the XC course being quite smooth -
    there were very few sections where rear sus will make a big difference,
    and full sus bikes will be about 2kg heavier than their front sus only
    bikes, so hardtails had a slight advantage over full sus on that course.
    Alan.

    --
    To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'.
    http://www.dvatc.co.uk - Off-road cycling in the North Midlands.

  4. Evan Evans said:

    Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that all
    the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because almost all
    high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the olympians use
    the very best equiptment? Many including the winner didn't even have
    disc brakes.
    What gives?

    Weight, on a hilly course.

  5. I also noticed that all bikes had straight handlebars, something that I
    can't find on hardly any bikes in any shops around here. Riser bars never
    made any sense to me, especially with suspension forks. At least, not for
    cross country, but I think all XC bikes being sold are given the image of
    downhill bikes anyways, because that's the cool thing right now... that and
    free riding style. Infact, i've even had hard times locating straight bars
    alone in this city.

    Mike

    "Helmut Springer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Evan Evans said:

    Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that
    all the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because
    almost all high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the
    olympians use the very best equiptment?

    I'd assume they used the very best suited for this kind of race
    (cross country) to win, with the limitation that pros will race the
    sponsor's equiptment were possible.

    --
    MfG/Best regards
    helmut springer

  6. Evan Evans said:

    Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that all
    the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because almost all
    high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the olympians use
    the very best equiptment? Many including the winner didn't even have
    disc brakes.
    What gives?

    I think you think those things are more important in this type of
    race than they actually are. This was not a downhill race.

  7. because hardtails rule the day!

    hardtails with rim brakes are the fastest bikes for cross country for many reasons

    1) more efficient pedaling
    2) lighter
    3) more ridged frames
    4) rim brakes are considerably lighter than disk brakes

    Olympians want their bikes to be as light and fast as possible. For light and fast a hardtail with XTR V-brakes can't be beat.

  8. gevans-<< Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that all
    the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because almost all
    high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the olympians use
    the very best equiptment? Many including the winner didn't even have
    disc brakes.
    What gives? >><BR><BR>

    MTB marketing departments must love you. Hardtail-with Vs, lighter, more
    reliable.....How would a soft or full suspension and discs made these riders
    faster?

    Remember that for this course, legs and arms do a wonderful job of
    'suspension'.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  9. Quoted message said:


    I'm not sure about the disc brakes, I think most did have them, but as for
    hardtails - they are still perceived as being a little bit 'quicker' than
    full sussers for XC racing,though I tend to the opinion that full-sussers
    are better, but that is mainly the comfort factor making lesser mortals
    like me race for longer, - they are more comfortable over the bumps, thus
    you expend less energy absorbing the bumps with your arms and legs, so you
    are not so fatigued after 2 hours.
    The pros are several levels fitter than normal people so the extra bumping
    wont adversly affect them ,as well as the XC course being quite smooth -
    there were very few sections where rear sus will make a big difference,
    and full sus bikes will be about 2kg heavier than their front sus only
    bikes, so hardtails had a slight advantage over full sus on that course.
    Alan.

    The hardtails are perceived as quicker but actualy are slower than
    f.s. bikes? Man that sucks!

  10. Evan Evans said:
    Quoted message said:

    bikes, so hardtails had a slight advantage over full sus on that
    course.

    The hardtails are perceived as quicker but actualy are slower than
    f.s. bikes? Man that sucks!

    Actually the poster said exactly the opposite for the given riders
    on the given course...

    --
    MfG/Best regards
    helmut springer

  11. Mike Beauchamp said:

    I also noticed that all bikes had straight handlebars, something that I
    can't find on hardly any bikes in any shops around here. Riser bars
    never made any sense to me, especially with suspension forks. At least,
    not for cross country, but I think all XC bikes being sold are given
    the image of downhill bikes anyways, because that's the cool thing
    right now... that and free riding style. Infact, i've even had hard
    times locating straight bars alone in this city.

    Riser bars can be nice -- most of them are wider, and a 25" bar gives a
    bit more control than a 23" bar (because you have more leverage). But
    really they're mostly the "in" thing right now... back in 1992 20" bars
    were all the rage for XC.

    Hardtail bikes are faster in most cases for high speed XC racing.
    Certainly more so over a 2 hour race than a full squish.

    Quoted message said:


    Mike

    "Helmut Springer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Evan Evans said:

    Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that
    all the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because
    almost all high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the
    olympians use the very best equiptment?

    I'd assume they used the very best suited for this kind of race
    (cross country) to win, with the limitation that pros will race the
    sponsor's equiptment were possible.

    --
    MfG/Best regards
    helmut springer

  12. [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo ) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    gevans-<< Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that all
    the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because almost all
    high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the olympians use
    the very best equiptment? Many including the winner didn't even have
    disc brakes.
    What gives? >><BR><BR>

    MTB marketing departments must love you. Hardtail-with Vs, lighter, more
    reliable.....How would a soft or full suspension and discs made these riders
    faster?

    Remember that for this course, legs and arms do a wonderful job of
    'suspension'.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene

    I've been into bike's for like 25 years now but the current mtb
    marketing game takes the cake !

  13. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    gevans-<< Looking over some photos from the olympic mtb race i noticed that all
    the bikes were hardtails. That seemed strange to me because almost all
    high end mtb's in stores are soft tails. Why don't the olympians use
    the very best equiptment? Many including the winner didn't even have
    disc brakes.
    What gives? >><BR><BR>

    MTB marketing departments must love you. Hardtail-with Vs, lighter, more
    reliable.....How would a soft or full suspension and discs made these riders
    faster?

    Remember that for this course, legs and arms do a wonderful job of
    'suspension'.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

    Noticed the hardtails among the leaders as well. Does anyone Know if any
    used suspension seatposts or Pantour hubs?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.