CyclingForums
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
UK and Europe · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
My point was in reponse to the suggestions for the plural of Audax;
i.e. that audax doesn't have a plural becasuse it's not a noun.
Of course, it hardly matters a jot, as we are all free to use the word
in whatever way we see fit. Audaxes, Audaxing, Audaxed (as in "I'm
totally and utterly audaxed"😉
:-)
Ian
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.