joemarshall said:*I don't really understand what the point of wanting unicycling in the
olympics is, especially in the way racing is done now?*
To major points, which other could add to if it weren't even more off
the topic of this thread:
1. Because getting there means we have established ourselves as a
serious sport that the whole world is likely to be aware of.
2. The process of *getting there* will do a tremendous amount toward
building unicycling in many countries, organizing what we do, and
otherwise spreading the word about unicycling, not just in a few events
but in all the things we do such as at a Unicon.
Some of the hardest steps have already been taken. There are other hard
ones still to go, but at least we have an international organization,
and international set of rules, and an event every two years that people
seem to recognized and accept as the focal point of international
unicycle competition. Now we need to add countries, build up the
organization, and solidify the way we do things so it's worthy of the
kinds of goals we have.
[b]> The reason biking is really good in the olympics is because it's such
Quoted message said:a different style of race to all the other events, whereas unicycling
just seems like a rip-off of running races that happens to use
unicycles.[/B]
Except maybe triathlon, which came along later. Or marathon running.
Certainly the velodrome is used by no other sport, so riding fast around
*that* track is different from riding around the athletic track used for
other disciplines.
So looking at it from your point of view, track racing might not be the
best event to try breaking into the Olympics with. I wouldn't go for
road racing, because we're so much slower than the bikes. We could try
to elbow in on a marathon-length event, where we'd be faster, but not by
that much. And we'd be copying again.
I perceive Trials as perhaps the fastest growing area of unicycling.
Don't know if that's a good event to try for in the Olympics, but at
least it's different.
Artistic events, such as Freestyle, would also be interesting, but
Freestyle judging is too subjective so I don't know how acceptable that
would be. The Standard Skill event, boring as it is for most of us, was
developed specifically for the purpose of having an objectively-judged
artistic event. To first help us get into Germany, and later head for
the Olympics, like Artistic Bicycling. But I don't think Artistic
Bicycling has made much progress in the 22 years since I first got
involved, so maybe that's not the way either.
In any case, by the time we've solidified our position, and added
bunches of new countries to the roster, surely things will have changed.
We don't have to worry now, about which unicycling discipline will make
it into the Olympics first. Let's just have fun doing the ones we
like!
Including jousting, for all you riding-into-sticks fans!
--
johnfoss - Walkin' on the edge
John Foss, the Uni-Cyclone
"jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com
"Read the rules!"
'IUF Rulebook' (
http://www.unicycling.org/iuf/rulebook/)
'USA Rulebook' (
http://www.unicycling.org/usa/competition/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
johnfoss's Profile:
http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832View this thread:
http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34554