rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Responding to spam threads

Started by harper · · Last activity · 10 posts · 363 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
4 August 2004
Last activity
6 August 2004
Original author
harper
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
363
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am always against responding to spam because I like to see the threads
    die quickly. One notable exception is in the most recent case.

    John Childs pointed out that the link in a spam message was a .zip file.
    These are self extracting and notorious for containing viruses and other
    bad things. If you see spam with a dangerous link like this one or one
    with a .pif or .exe file or other executable file, please respond, like
    John did, but only once.

    If you see that someone has already posted the warning, go ahead and
    notify the moderators if you want to but don't respond anymore; just let
    it die. Just because someone posted a warning doesn't mean that they
    notified the moderators. Eventually a moderator will get a report and
    trash the message.

    Warnings, like John gave, I think are a good idea in this case.

    --
    harper - Statuesque

    -Greg Harper

    B L U E S H I F T

    "You go through life and you choose." - Greg Harper

    "Find weak people and take stuff from them" - Greg Harper
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    harper's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/426
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34304

  2. as the poster boy for what exaggerated measures can happen when you do
    post to spam. i now watch with joy as some of them seem to last forever.
    like the big fat one that pops up out of no where.

    everytime spam hits the board i get a covered in goose pimples. i no
    longer report since i wouldnt want to annoy Sir Gilbus with fluff.

    BTW, i guess the [censored] shots in the News and Announcements section that
    have been there for almost 3 days isnt spam eh?
    right click fast boys

    --
    jagur - #3649_all fluff i hear?

    ---------------------------------------------------
    [image: http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albums/albup23/fc_1.jpg]

    -Forget_Your_Life-

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    jagur's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/502
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34304

  3. moderators

    Thanks for the time you spend with this forum. I'm sure much time is
    spent doing this work and for the good of the overall forum. I am very
    appreciative of this forum and the work that is done to keep it
    running.

    Thanks

    Bill

    --
    billham

    The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    billham's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4625
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34304

  4. jagur said:

    *as the poster boy for what exaggerated measures can happen when you
    do post to spam. i now watch with joy as some of them seem to last
    forever. like the big fat one that pops up out of no where.

    *

    You're a poster boy in more than one thread right now, aren't you? I
    hope they find the article and get your photo posted.

    The big, fat one really is a pain. It apparently crossed over from a
    bicycling forum somewhere.

    --
    harper - Statuesque

    -Greg Harper

    B L U E S H I F T

    "You go through life and you choose." - Greg Harper

    "Find weak people and take stuff from them" - Greg Harper
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    harper's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/426
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34304

  5. Here, here! I couldn't agree more! Let me be the first to point out
    that most of what I say constatutes Spam, and that you have my full
    support in banning anyone who encourages me by responding.

    What say you?

    😄

    -C

    --
    rhysling - Pontificating < Vigilantly

    "That whole design was stupid." -Greg Harper, in a mental disertation
    with God on the Cheeta, shortly before his first hub siezed.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rhysling's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/411
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34304

  6. harper said:


    The big, fat one really is a pain. It apparently crossed over from a
    bicycling forum somewhere.

    Most spam, including that one, could be robomoderated out of the forum
    by discarding messages posted to more than one newsgroup. That
    wouldn't fix rec.sport.unicycling on Usenet (the newsgroup would have
    to become moderated and Gilby would have to take on even more work to
    do that), but it would fix most of the garbage for most of the
    participants.

    Since I read Usenet, this doesn't help me directly. You can suggest
    it if you like the idea.

    Ken

  7. Ken Cline said:

    Most spam, including that one, could be robomoderated out of the forum
    by discarding messages posted to more than one newsgroup. That
    wouldn't fix rec.sport.unicycling on Usenet (the newsgroup would have
    to become moderated and Gilby would have to take on even more work to
    do that),


    Gilby doesn't seem to be so newsgroup-minded so I can't see him taking
    that on.

    Quoted message said:

    but it would fix most of the garbage for most of the
    participants.

    Since I read Usenet, this doesn't help me directly. You can suggest
    it if you like the idea.


    Fortunately, there is little spam on the newsgroup (knock it off). As
    it is, I can easily deal with it.

    Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict
    --
    I like the idea of not having to balance when out on a ride - joe

  8. (Klaas Bil) said:
    Ken Cline said:

    Most spam, including that one, could be robomoderated out of the forum
    by discarding messages posted to more than one newsgroup. That
    wouldn't fix rec.sport.unicycling on Usenet (the newsgroup would have
    to become moderated and Gilby would have to take on even more work to
    do that),


    Gilby doesn't seem to be so newsgroup-minded so I can't see him taking
    that on.

    Taking what on? Filtering out cross-posted Usenet messages before
    they are posted to unicyclist.com should be very easy and would help
    keep that forum clean of junk without involving moderators. The
    filter is nearly trivial: reject any message with a comma in the
    "newsgroups:" line. I think it's a win, but it doesn't help me since
    I read r.s.u. on Usenet.

    Moderating Usenet r.s.u., on the other hand, is a much more ambitious
    task - one that would either require Gilby or a team of moderators to
    commit to maintain. Not worth it in my estimation.

  9. Spam is a Most Agreagious Offence in Nangon. Suspision of Spam or
    encouraging Spam by further discource results in imediate imprizonment
    with trial some time later.

    Currently my uncle and Governer of Nangon Province Lia Xio suffers the
    company of several Spamers at the Central Prizon in Bijing including my
    brother Lia Phat and Infamouse Spamer Jagur Thomas.

    My brother hopes for a quick release as the recounting of Jagurs glory
    day as Bicylce messanger grows intolerable with each retelling. Let
    his suffering be an example to you all.

    Lia Zan
    Depute Lurker of Nangon Prefecture

    --
    Lia Zan - Depute Lurker Province of Nangon

    The blessings of the People of Nangon are yours
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Lia Zan's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7389
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/34304

  10. Ken, I quoted too liberally. I commented specifically on your
    statement "the newsgroup would have to become moderated and Gilby
    would have to take on even more work to do that".

    Moderating the newsgroup on Usenet is what I can't see Gilby taking
    on.

    Ken Cline said:
    (Klaas Bil) said:
    Ken Cline said:

    Most spam, including that one, could be robomoderated out of the forum
    by discarding messages posted to more than one newsgroup. That
    wouldn't fix rec.sport.unicycling on Usenet (the newsgroup would have
    to become moderated and Gilby would have to take on even more work to
    do that),


    Gilby doesn't seem to be so newsgroup-minded so I can't see him taking
    that on.

    Taking what on? Filtering out cross-posted Usenet messages before
    they are posted to unicyclist.com should be very easy and would help
    keep that forum clean of junk without involving moderators. The
    filter is nearly trivial: reject any message with a comma in the
    "newsgroups:" line. I think it's a win, but it doesn't help me since
    I read r.s.u. on Usenet.

    Moderating Usenet r.s.u., on the other hand, is a much more ambitious
    task - one that would either require Gilby or a team of moderators to
    commit to maintain. Not worth it in my estimation.

    Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict
    --
    I like the idea of not having to balance when out on a ride - joe

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.