Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

value for $, CF vs. alum/alloy seatposts

Started by ThrillBilly · · Last activity · 3 posts · 453 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 August 2004
Last activity
5 August 2004
Original author
ThrillBilly
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
453
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. i need a new post in 27.2mm, and have been looking around.

    one thing that struck me is the pricing difference between CF and alloys.
    it seems that CF is much more expensive when similar weights are compared.

    does a CF post offer a better ride quality? im willing to pay for that.
    i would presume that an alum/alloy post has a potentially longer service life?
    are CF posts prone to failures or shortened service life?

    i understand that extremely lite (~100g) CF posts are available, that would provide an advantage for TT, etc. but i dont see that being for everyday use.

    the other thing i desire is a post with a GOOD easy-to-adjust head. i wouldnt be changing it hardy ever after finally getting the right setup, but ease of adjust during the process (im also getting a new saddle, thus the extensive setup) will be a BIG plus. ive had other posts that were a royal pain to adjust.

    so, does the CF post provide any big advantage in your opinion? 😕
    or is it mostly marketing to the disposeable income demographic?

  2. ThrillBilly said:

    i need a new post in 27.2mm, and have been looking around.

    one thing that struck me is the pricing difference between CF and alloys.
    it seems that CF is much more expensive when similar weights are compared.

    does a CF post offer a better ride quality? im willing to pay for that.
    i would presume that an alum/alloy post has a potentially longer service life?
    are CF posts prone to failures or shortened service life?

    i understand that extremely lite (~100g) CF posts are available, that would provide an advantage for TT, etc. but i dont see that being for everyday use.

    the other thing i desire is a post with a GOOD easy-to-adjust head. i wouldnt be changing it hardy ever after finally getting the right setup, but ease of adjust during the process (im also getting a new saddle, thus the extensive setup) will be a BIG plus. ive had other posts that were a royal pain to adjust.

    so, does the CF post provide any big advantage in your opinion? 😕
    or is it mostly marketing to the disposeable income demographic?

    If you have the disposable dinero,buy the CF for the bling,wow factor and possible poseur points. My favorite post is light aluminum with a 2 bolt adjustment like the Thompson. You can probalby find others with a simialr adjustment setup for less $$.

  3. boudreaux said:

    If you have the disposable dinero,buy the CF for the bling,wow factor and possible poseur points. My favorite post is light aluminum with a 2 bolt adjustment like the Thompson. You can probalby find others with a simialr adjustment setup for less $$.


    boudreaux, i had one thompson elite, its great, but wrong color.
    and you are (as you sometimes are) right, its a good adjuster.

    in your opinion,

    does CF provide a "better" ride? is CF more subject to failure?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.