I have a 2004 trek 2100 and it came with a set of pedals. I noticed that the pedals the riders were using in the TDF they had bigger pedals with a wider base than mine. Should i get a bigger pedal like the shimano spd or just stick with my shimano 520's? and what kind of difference would i experince if i switched between the 2?
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
shimano pedals
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 1 August 2004
- Last activity
- 2 August 2004
- Original author
- HyperPhreak
- Posts
- 2
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 935
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
HyperPhreak said:
I have a 2004 trek 2100 and it came with a set of pedals. I noticed that the pedals the riders were using in the TDF they had bigger pedals with a wider base than mine. Should i get a bigger pedal like the shimano spd or just stick with my shimano 520's? and what kind of difference would i experince if i switched between the 2?
The 520's actually are the SPD type of pedal. What you are referring to are probably the newer SPD-SL type of pedal (PD-R540, PD-R600, PD-7800) which are closer to LOOK style of pedals.I have personally found the SPD-SL style (Shimano PD-R600) to be much easier to clip into for starts. The wider platform seems also to feel better to me in hard acceleration.
The cleats are much larger on the SL pedal system and cannot be recessed like they can on some more casual styles of SPD shoes.
I've heard that Shimano is revamping the PD-R600s already with the new even wider base PD-6610s that are debuting with the new Ultegra-10 groupo. Not sure if the cleat design is being revamped as well.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.