Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Polar 720i vs. 725

Started by Marcus I. Valdes · · Last activity · 11 posts · 471 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 July 2004
Last activity
19 July 2004
Original author
Marcus I. Valdes
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
471
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Probably overkill, but I think I'm going to pick one of these up.
    Would love to hear some of your experiences with them, and what are
    the major differences.

    Thanks,
    Marcus
    [email hidden]

  2. Marcus I. Valdes wrote -

    Quoted message said:

    Would love to hear some of your experiences with them, and what are
    the major differences.

    Have a 720i and love it - did not get the power measuring accessory as I
    have heard its fiddly and needs a lot of attention.

    The cycling functions (speed, distance, cadence) work fine, and the wireless
    and speed sensors are simple, elegant and effective.

    You may want someone to help you interpret the heart rate results shown up
    on the graphs produced by the Polar software - the manual tells you how to
    make it work, not how to interpret the results or set training programs -

    Particularly liked the easy switchability between bikes, that it can replace
    your watch and you can easily alter and reset things in the monitor from
    your pc.

    There did not seem to be any worthwhile advantage going to a 725 for me.

    best, Andrew (remove the .x1 to reply)

  3. "Marcus I. Valdes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Probably overkill, but I think I'm going to pick one of these up.
    Would love to hear some of your experiences with them, and what are
    the major differences.

    Thanks,
    Marcus
    [email hidden]

    The 720i is a great unit. Best that I have owned to date. It is not perfect
    though.

    I often find I have to start a workout, wait for the heart rate to show and
    then start my ride. Otherwise the cyclecomputer starts up and my heart rate
    does not show for the whole ride. Do this a couple of times and you will
    want to crush your 720i.

    The big reason to get one of these is the PC link IMO. It is fiddly and uses
    FIR. The Polar software suite is OK - it looks dated. It is PC only. The
    web-based version is nicer, and obviously works on any computer, but you
    can't upload your data directly from the HRM to the website. The web-based
    version also is quirky. It has dashes in the fields that sometimes do not
    highlight when you double-click a field. You can't tab between fields. I
    like the idea of keeping my training log online - less likely to get
    deleted.

    Try and get a deal on one of these. I did so my expectations were lower
    ($350 CDN new). It is probably best of what is out there now, but way short
    of perfect. Lightyears short.

    The 725i just shows that Polar has some stupid priorities. I think it adds
    the ability to transfer data to a specific Nokia phone - itself very
    unappealing. Addressing some of the 720i defficiencies would have been a
    better idea. It just proves that a company like Shimano needs to enter this
    market.

    I think the ideal would be wireless Flightdeck with HRM and PC interface
    (maybe some predictive watt measuring).

  4. lewdvig said:

    The 720i is a great unit. Best that I have owned to date. It is not perfect
    though.

    I often find I have to start a workout, wait for the heart rate to show and
    then start my ride. Otherwise the cyclecomputer starts up and my heart rate
    does not show for the whole ride. Do this a couple of times and you will
    want to crush your 720i.

    Um, this "feature" is documented in their admittedly less than good
    user manual. You need to make sure the watch has acquired a heart
    rate before starting the exercise.

    But if you lose your heart rate during a ride, or you never got it
    in the first place, simply bring your chest transmitter to the
    watch. This will make the Polar search again for the transmitter
    signal. You'll find this feature documented on pg. M105, under
    "Display Symbols" (see what I mean about the poor user manual?).
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA http://bike.terrymorse.com/

  5. lewdvig said:

    The big reason to get one of these is the PC link IMO. It is fiddly and uses
    FIR. The Polar software suite is OK - it looks dated. It is PC only. The
    web-based version is nicer, and obviously works on any computer, but you
    can't upload your data directly from the HRM to the website. The web-based
    version also is quirky. It has dashes in the fields that sometimes do not
    highlight when you double-click a field. You can't tab between fields. I
    like the idea of keeping my training log online - less likely to get
    deleted.

    Just curious, where can I find this web based version of the Polar software? Do you
    mean the http://www.polarcyclingcoach.com site where you create an account and enter
    in your data? Or some other site?

    J. Spaceman

    --
    My email address ([email hidden]) is fake. Email sent to it will
    only get caught in my spam tarpit.

  6. Terry Morse said:

    But if you lose your heart rate during a ride, or you never got it
    in the first place, simply bring your chest transmitter to the
    watch. This will make the Polar search again for the transmitter
    signal. You'll find this feature documented on pg. M105, under
    "Display Symbols" (see what I mean about the poor user manual?).

    Ummm, stupid question, but how do you do this when the monitor is on
    your handlebars? Perhaps you are some sort of a stunt biker?

  7. Someone said:
    Terry Morse said:

    But if you lose your heart rate during a ride, or you never got it
    in the first place, simply bring your chest transmitter to the
    watch. This will make the Polar search again for the transmitter
    signal.

    Ummm, stupid question, but how do you do this when the monitor is on
    your handlebars? Perhaps you are some sort of a stunt biker?

    Well, it's easier done when the bike is stopped. It can be done when
    moving, carefully. The necessary position is very similar to a tight
    tuck. If you're not familiar with the position, it's better to stop.
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA http://bike.terrymorse.com/

  8. Terry Morse said:

    But if you lose your heart rate during a ride, or you never got it
    in the first place, simply bring your chest transmitter to the
    watch. This will make the Polar search again for the transmitter
    signal. You'll find this feature documented on pg. M105, under
    "Display Symbols" (see what I mean about the poor user manual?).

    Did they add this for the 720? I have a 710 and can't get it to find my
    monitor after a short break. Really sucks to lose an entire ride's data
    because you step away from the bike for a few minutes. I've tried
    bringing my strap to the watch but no joy.

  9. Someone said:
    Terry Morse said:

    But if you lose your heart rate during a ride, or you never got it
    in the first place, simply bring your chest transmitter to the
    watch. This will make the Polar search again for the transmitter
    signal. You'll find this feature documented on pg. M105, under
    "Display Symbols" (see what I mean about the poor user manual?).

    Did they add this for the 720? I have a 710 and can't get it to find my
    monitor after a short break. Really sucks to lose an entire ride's data
    because you step away from the bike for a few minutes. I've tried
    bringing my strap to the watch but no joy.

    The 720 has a 30-minute window where it won't shut off when the
    signal is lost. I think the 710's window is only 5 minutes.
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA http://bike.terrymorse.com/

  10. "Jason Spaceman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    lewdvig said:

    The big reason to get one of these is the PC link IMO. It is fiddly and


    uses

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    FIR. The Polar software suite is OK - it looks dated. It is PC only. The
    web-based version is nicer, and obviously works on any computer, but you
    can't upload your data directly from the HRM to the website. The


    web-based

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    version also is quirky. It has dashes in the fields that sometimes do


    not

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    highlight when you double-click a field. You can't tab between fields. I
    like the idea of keeping my training log online - less likely to get
    deleted.

    Just curious, where can I find this web based version of the Polar


    software? Do you

    Quoted message said:

    mean the http://www.polarcyclingcoach.com site where you create an account


    and enter

    Quoted message said:

    in your data? Or some other site?

    That is the one. I like it better than the PC software.

  11. "Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Someone said:
    Terry Morse said:

    But if you lose your heart rate during a ride, or you never got it
    in the first place, simply bring your chest transmitter to the
    watch. This will make the Polar search again for the transmitter
    signal.

    Ummm, stupid question, but how do you do this when the monitor is on
    your handlebars? Perhaps you are some sort of a stunt biker?

    Well, it's easier done when the bike is stopped. It can be done when
    moving, carefully. The necessary position is very similar to a tight
    tuck. If you're not familiar with the position, it's better to stop.
    --

    This is how I mark a completed lap on mine.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.