On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:51:37 GMT, "Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction
Bicycles said:Quoted message said:Thanks for the insight. I agree that if you want a new bike NOW, get
it, don't wait! However, if the Chinese are increasing their costs,
how soon will it be before these same mfrs will move their production
facilities over to other "lower-cost" countries like maybe the
Philippines or Vietnam or even Cambodia....
It's inevitable that production will continue to shift towards emerging
3rd-world countries as a means to save money. However, the Philippines
might not be as likely as many others, since they've become relatively
stagnant in their "emergence." One would have thought that the Philippines
would have evolved into a major manufacturing center long ago, given their
relative proximity to countries that have long felt the effects of improving
(and expensive) living standards. Probably just shows my ignorance of the
Asian economic situation.
At the risk of going far, far off-topic here:
Proximity or exposure to higher standards of living has little to do
with the underlying structural problems in the country. This would be
akin to arguing that Watts' proximity to Hollywood should have made it
a very affluent district by now.
The Philippines lags behind other ASEAN economies because of, among
other things:
1) Bad governance: Doing business there is notoriously difficult for
overseas firms; they are in particular hamepered by constitutional
provisions against the foreign ownership of land.
2) An entrenched landed elite. The landed elite class also happens to
control most of domestic industrial activity; they're rolling in so
much money from their rents that there is basically zero incentive for
them to compete globally.
As regards this, my father always likes to tell the story of San
Miguel Beer--once the premier beer in Asia, shipped and available
everywhere, especially where U.S. forces went. In Hong Kong in the
seventies, said Dad, everybody drank "Sanee Mig" as they said in the
local pidgin. Now, San Miguel has lost regional market share to
other players: Tiger, Singha, Tsingtao--and to global ones, like
Carlsberg. The corporation, publically-listed but closely-held by the
Cojuanco family, didn't and doesnt' do much about the situation, since
they seem to be satisfied only with domestic Philippine consumption.
3) Poor political stability, at least when compared to its other ASEAN
member-states. Unconsolidated democracy, in this respect, is far more
of a liability to an emerging economy than autocratic
developmental-statism. It's very difficult to argue with Singapore
and Malaysia's parallel success over the past 40 years, despite or
even because of strong authoritarian rule. A simmering insurgency in
Mindanao and a sporadically-active armed Communist movement discourage
foreign investors--never mind that the worst of the fighting is
concentrated in few districts.
In sum, the Philippines is twenty to thirty years behind Singapore,
Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. In the 1960s, the Philippine
economy was by far the most developed and most productive of the
original ASEAN members. Twenty years of abusive and corrupt rule
under Ferdinand Marcos drained the public treasury and bankrupted the
economy. For the Filipino and the historian, there's a bitter irony
in this: Marcos had first come to power pledging to break the power
of the traditional politicians (the sons of that same landed elite
that had, in their turn, collaborated with Spain, America, and Japan),
and mobilize the country for development as part of a "New Society."
The difference was that, unlike Lee Kwan-Yew's enlightened and largely
benign developmental statism in Singapore, Marcos' kleptocracy
actually set the country back.
I'd love to see things change for the better in my lifetime, and the
lifteime of my cousins. But for many of us, the only option is really
emigration.
-Luigi